Dr. Sanzibar

Dr. Sanzibar — CS2 Stats

76561198919636898[U:1:959371170]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

619Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPositional Player
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (51 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,191 → 1,191
+5Tracked matches · now 619
−6.7ppWin rate · 53.3% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,559 +960 21 Dec – 24 Sept · 22 days played
11,60814,443peak 14,44321 Dec24 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,191 +0 30 Aug – 24 Sept · 5 observations
1,1911,191peak 1,19130 Aug24 Sept
14,681Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,191Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2025-12-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,191
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 10 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDr. Sanzibar30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,191csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning58
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLLLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −105ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 459ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 485ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility3.5
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning5.8
Utility3.5
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time539ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–10 · vertigo, 29 Jul →
62%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 17 Jan →
344msFastest reaction time · 9–3 · inferno, 22 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 4 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9ancientWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3014–1647%-0.00
nukeA148–657%0.02
dust2B136–746%-0.01
ancientC125–742%-0.02
anubisS96–367%0.02
infernoC73–443%-0.02
overpassA53–260%-0.00
cache—31–233%0.05
vertigo—21–150%0.07
palacio—20–20%0.01
shelter—10–10%0.03
golden—11–0100%-0.03
train—10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

289Matches
51%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
74.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6854%0.9714.0
Anubis3447%0.9815.2
Nuke2770%1.1614.2
Inferno1540%0.9412.9
Ancient1457%1.0413.9
Dust2967%0.9713.2
Vertigo560%1.0814.6
Cache560%1.4613.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.7%Spray accuracy
65.5%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
540msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
56.6%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
9.24HE damage / grenade
3.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4283 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7685% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0313%27 Oct →
dust26–13-0.067%27 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0520%26 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0132%1 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0321%1 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0518%1 Sept →
dust213–50.0216%1 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0515%27 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0414%26 Aug →
anubis13–80.0117%24 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.0124%24 Aug →
cache8–130.0216%22 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0213%18 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0315%11 Aug →
mirage1–7-0.0225%9 Aug →
mirage13–60.0111%5 Aug →
cache10–130.0341%5 Aug →
inferno2–130.0012%5 Aug →
ancient13–90.0122%5 Aug →
mirage13–10.0710%4 Aug →
cache13–20.0918%4 Aug →
ancient13–100.0116%30 Jul →
nuke10–130.0517%30 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0619%30 Jul →
vertigo13–100.1814%29 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0230%29 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.027%29 Jul →
shelter2–80.0327%28 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0322%28 Jul →
nuke10–130.0626%28 Jul →
anubis13–50.0215%22 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.058%22 Jul →
inferno9–3-0.0938%22 Jul →
anubis13–70.0613%22 Jul →
nuke13–90.0321%12 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0330%12 Mar →
mirage11–130.0227%7 Mar →
mirage13–50.0729%24 Feb →
anubis11–130.0036%24 Feb →
nuke14–16-0.0323%23 Feb →
mirage7–130.0436%23 Feb →
ancient16–130.0213%10 Feb →
overpass9–13-0.0520%28 Jan →
mirage3–130.0027%28 Jan →
nuke13–40.0842%28 Jan →
anubis4–13-0.0321%28 Jan →
ancient3–13-0.1114%24 Jan →
dust28–13-0.0423%23 Jan →
mirage13–20.1233%22 Jan →
anubis10–130.0119%19 Jan →
ancient9–13-0.0113%17 Jan →
mirage13–60.0462%17 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.0714%17 Jan →
mirage11–13-0.0034%17 Jan →
inferno11–13-0.0121%15 Jan →
ancient2–13-0.0321%12 Jan →
dust213–110.0113%12 Jan →
ancient15–15-0.0319%11 Jan →
mirage13–10-0.0425%10 Jan →
nuke9–2-0.030%9 Jan →
dust213–11-0.0117%8 Jan →
inferno13–60.0217%7 Jan →
inferno11–13-0.0211%6 Jan →
nuke13–80.0923%6 Jan →
mirage13–3-0.0121%4 Jan →
anubis13–50.0632%4 Jan →
nuke8–130.006%2 Jan →
golden13–10-0.0327%1 Jan →
palacio2–13-0.0617%1 Jan →
dust216–13-0.0319%31 Dec →
nuke13–11-0.0019%30 Dec →
mirage10–13-0.0422%30 Dec →
dust213–10.0535%30 Dec →
ancient4–13-0.0420%30 Dec →
mirage6–130.0425%29 Dec →
dust24–13-0.0022%29 Dec →
palacio9–130.0826%29 Dec →
nuke16–130.0750%28 Dec →
mirage13–20.0014%27 Dec →
mirage13–50.0124%27 Dec →
inferno11–13-0.0519%27 Dec →
overpass13–110.0324%27 Dec →
mirage13–10-0.0224%25 Dec →
overpass13–11-0.0115%23 Dec →
mirage8–13-0.0623%23 Dec →
overpass15–15-0.0411%22 Dec →
dust211–130.0213%22 Dec →
mirage16–130.0516%21 Dec →
inferno13–8-0.0221%21 Dec →
ancient13–90.0511%21 Dec →
ancient13–8-0.028%21 Dec →
mirage10–130.0220%20 Dec →
dust28–130.0617%20 Dec →
mirage11–130.0119%20 Dec →
vertigo12–12-0.0315%20 Dec →
nuke1–13-0.0040%20 Dec →
overpass13–50.0517%15 Dec →
anubis13–80.0722%14 Dec →
train10–13-0.0633%14 Dec →
nuke13–100.0324%13 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.