Rasmus

Rasmus — CS2 Stats

76561198892066061[U:1:931800333]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

346Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRasmusFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning51
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45514Last 10045%Win rateLWLTWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.0pp headshot accuracy · +93ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 674ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility3.3
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 599ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.1
Utility3.3
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time606ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy22.9%+7.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 4 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–8 · vertigo, 21 Feb
422msFastest reaction time · 16–11 · inferno, 6 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 6 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 54% over 13mirageWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB28131546%-0.04
vertigoB24121250%-0.01
infernoB168850%-0.00
ancientB137654%-0.01
mirageC114736%-0.05
overpass4040%-0.08
cache21150%-0.04
train1010%-0.02
anubis1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

411Matches
54%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
69.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1771%1.0015.7
Mirage1354%1.4313.8
Nuke1173%0.9715.4
Cache1050%0.9213.3
Vertigo967%1.0314.0
Inferno888%0.8914.4
Anubis425%1.0414.0
Dust2333%0.6912.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
599msReaction time
19.6%T opening success
43.1%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
6.16HE damage / grenade
4.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4653 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.5686% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–9-0.0016%15 Sept
nuke7–2-0.0729%14 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0431%11 Sept
ancient12–12-0.0622%7 Sept
inferno13–50.0117%6 Sept
ancient1–5-0.0236%6 Sept
nuke9–40.0314%6 Sept
ancient13–110.0322%30 Aug
cache10–13-0.0027%29 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0427%27 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.0517%25 Aug
ancient13–20.0927%25 Aug
ancient4–90.0158%24 Aug
mirage9–130.0027%24 Aug
inferno2–7-0.0144%24 Aug
ancient13–11-0.067%20 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0140%13 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0223%13 Aug
inferno13–110.0126%9 Aug
vertigo13–70.0622%9 Aug
nuke11–130.0018%9 Aug
vertigo13–80.0117%7 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0417%7 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0218%7 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0510%6 Aug
nuke4–5-0.0329%6 Aug
nuke13–1-0.0026%6 Aug
nuke3–130.0017%4 Aug
nuke9–10.2110%4 Aug
overpass8–8-0.0820%4 Aug
ancient7–12-0.059%4 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0121%4 Aug
nuke3–9-0.0913%4 Aug
inferno6–9-0.138%4 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0211%4 Aug
nuke6–13-0.1429%4 Aug
nuke3–00.000%4 Aug
vertigo8–130.027%8 Dec
vertigo8–130.0110%6 Dec
vertigo6–9-0.0238%6 Dec
vertigo9–50.1337%6 Dec
nuke13–100.0012%6 Dec
vertigo13–1-0.0031%6 Dec
nuke9–13-0.0612%6 Dec
mirage1–13-0.106%6 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0116%6 Dec
train7–13-0.0219%5 Dec
vertigo5–130.0117%5 Dec
mirage8–13-0.1125%5 Dec
inferno13–50.0526%30 May
inferno12–120.1230%12 May
inferno13–50.1424%12 May
vertigo5–130.0023%25 Apr
vertigo13–8-0.0323%23 Apr
nuke13–60.0128%23 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.0518%24 Mar
vertigo13–30.0143%24 Mar
vertigo6–130.0127%23 Mar
vertigo13–7-0.0236%20 Mar
ancient13–70.0212%15 Mar
nuke1–9-0.2840%4 Mar
vertigo2–8-0.12100%21 Feb
nuke13–70.0414%23 Dec
anubis9–10-0.0114%15 Dec
vertigo9–13-0.046%23 Nov
ancient13–8-0.0314%16 Nov
nuke15–15-0.039%14 Nov
vertigo13–3-0.0610%14 Nov
mirage0–10-0.120%12 Nov
ancient13–7-0.0319%12 Nov
inferno7–13-0.0327%11 Nov
mirage13–90.0421%19 Oct
nuke13–11-0.0535%28 Sept
nuke13–90.0022%28 Sept
nuke13–10.0522%28 Sept
vertigo3–13-0.0522%27 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0618%23 Sept
vertigo6–130.0114%18 Sept
vertigo8–13-0.0617%18 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0711%15 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0223%11 Sept
vertigo13–10.0510%11 Sept
nuke1–13-0.0325%11 Sept
mirage2–13-0.096%3 Sept
overpass6–13-0.110%1 Sept
vertigo13–9-0.090%1 Sept
cache16–12-0.0714%30 Aug
nuke0–10-0.118%29 Aug
inferno16–11-0.064%6 Aug
nuke2–16-0.1311%3 Aug
inferno7–160.0212%3 Aug
overpass6–16-0.1022%25 Jul
overpass10–16-0.0220%20 Jul
mirage7–16-0.0523%18 Jul
ancient9–16-0.0420%18 Jul
nuke9–16-0.0512%18 Jul
vertigo19–16-0.0113%18 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0919%18 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0414%18 Jul
mirage9–9-0.0610%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →