koodiB

koodiB — CS2 Stats

CO76561198885044643[U:1:924778915]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,518Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,673Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2906 of 9543 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,949 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkoodiBFACEITLevel 10 · 1,949 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,673 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning70
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43516Last 10043%Win rateWLWLLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7
Aggression8.7
Utility4.4
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning7.0
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time573ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy25.9%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 25.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — dust2 13–7
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
119In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 16ancientWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%0.03
dust2A1610663%0.04
cacheB137654%0.03
anubisC104640%0.01
infernoC83538%0.02
nukeD72529%-0.01
overpassC73443%0.05
ancientD6060%-0.00
vertigo3030%-0.04
debris1010%-0.05
train1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,195Matches
51%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
90.6ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage32353%1.4120.1
Ancient11151%1.2318.3
Dust29645%1.2918.2
Nuke9448%1.1718.5
Inferno5641%1.1316.7
Anubis5655%1.2919.2
Overpass4854%1.4120.0
Train3577%1.5018.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.6%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
89.2%Counter-strafing
6.8°Preaim
568msReaction time
38.9%T opening success
51.9%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
7.28HE damage / grenade
8.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3829 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.9327% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–13-0.0311%26 Aug
cache6–130.0121%26 Aug
inferno13–100.0631%21 Aug
anubis7–130.0728%21 Aug
dust25–13-0.0325%20 Aug
mirage13–50.0129%20 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0118%20 Aug
cache10–13-0.0616%19 Aug
dust213–90.0329%19 Aug
mirage10–130.0418%18 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0233%18 Aug
vertigo10–130.0727%17 Aug
cache7–13-0.0438%17 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0122%17 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0121%13 Aug
anubis8–130.0333%13 Aug
dust26–130.0144%13 Aug
cache9–130.0125%11 Aug
dust213–90.0533%11 Aug
cache13–110.0633%11 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0123%7 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0826%7 Aug
nuke13–40.1220%5 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0218%5 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0033%5 Aug
dust213–70.2130%5 Aug
cache10–130.0922%3 Aug
ancient7–130.0119%3 Aug
dust22–13-0.0833%3 Aug
mirage13–100.0118%3 Aug
cache13–60.1329%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0326%2 Aug
anubis13–30.0621%2 Aug
cache16–120.0426%22 Jul
dust211–13-0.0321%22 Jul
ancient8–130.0122%21 Jul
mirage13–110.1129%21 Jul
dust215–150.1023%21 Jul
cache13–100.0415%21 Jul
mirage11–130.0127%21 Jul
vertigo2–9-0.1836%17 Jul
debris7–9-0.0526%17 Jul
inferno9–50.0621%17 Jul
mirage13–10.0614%16 Jul
nuke12–160.0331%16 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0126%13 Jul
cache7–13-0.0227%13 Jul
dust213–50.0927%10 Jul
mirage13–70.0335%10 Jul
mirage1–130.0138%10 Jul
dust213–80.1316%9 Jul
cache13–80.0527%9 Jul
cache13–110.1432%8 Jul
mirage13–20.0932%8 Jul
dust213–110.0415%8 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0030%6 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1415%6 Jul
overpass7–130.0535%3 Jul
mirage3–130.0021%3 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0132%2 Jul
dust213–50.0122%2 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0824%2 Jul
overpass16–130.0527%2 Jul
dust24–13-0.0430%2 Jul
nuke8–13-0.069%1 Jul
mirage15–150.0926%1 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0118%1 Jul
dust213–110.0415%1 Jul
overpass7–130.0732%1 Jul
inferno10–130.0118%25 Jun
anubis13–40.1122%25 Jun
mirage13–80.1233%25 Jun
mirage13–80.1528%25 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0117%25 Jun
anubis10–130.0013%25 Jun
dust213–110.1719%25 Jun
mirage10–130.0836%24 Jun
mirage8–130.0225%24 Jun
mirage16–130.1129%23 Jun
train12–12-0.0124%23 Jun
mirage12–120.0825%22 Jun
ancient11–130.0124%22 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0619%22 Jun
dust213–110.0123%22 Jun
nuke13–90.0121%22 Jun
nuke6–9-0.0329%22 Jun
inferno4–9-0.0711%22 Jun
ancient11–130.0043%21 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0110%18 Jun
overpass16–140.0536%18 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0117%16 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0411%16 Jun
inferno9–40.0217%15 Jun
nuke8–8-0.0645%15 Jun
cache13–100.0120%14 Jun
overpass11–130.0628%14 Jun
inferno8–80.1038%14 Jun
mirage13–30.1325%12 Jun
overpass13–90.1321%11 Jun
ancient12–160.0216%11 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →