sub human

sub human — CS2 Stats

IN76561198884355560[U:1:924089832]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

721Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,895Hours in CS5Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,504Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#68052 of 226713 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 18 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,504 +1,950 18 Feb14 Sept · 14 days played
18,55422,523peak 22,52318 Feb14 Sept
22,523Peak Premier in tracked matches
51Days played since 2026-02-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,019 below peak (22,523)
  • -1,414 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,496 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches6
Win rate17%
K/D0.66
Headshot %49%

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,197), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate43.0%41.3%41.9%above
Shot accuracy12.6%12.7%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.770.960.980.21 short
Match win rate29.2%42.5%43.3%14.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsub humanFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER20,504 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning58
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51463Last 10051%Win rateWLLWLWWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility4.8
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.8
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time551ms−148ms
first ⅓ avg 699ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 1 May
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · dust2, 22 Aug
398msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · dust2, 13 Aug
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 1 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 61% over 23infernoWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB37172046%0.03
dust2A2314961%0.02
infernoD1861233%-0.03
ancientA106460%0.03
cacheA53260%0.01
overpass330100%0.04
anubis21150%0.03
nuke21150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

67,360Lifetime kills
0.77K/D
3,765Matches
29.2%Match win rate
43.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
12.6%Shot accuracy
5,394MVPs
1,172Hours (in match)
2,677Bombs planted
683Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4722,256
AWP8,810
MP91,490
FAMAS1,238
SSG 081,190

Lifetime map wins

4,828dust2
3,568inferno
1,049nuke
680vertigo
318train
86lake
59cbble
38office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches
41%Win rate
0.57Avg K/D
61.1ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4125%1.0312.3
Dust2333%0.6610.3
Vertigo10%0.365.0
Nuke10%0.254.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.7%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
553msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
57.8%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
7.73HE damage / grenade
7.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.6103% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis11–90.0320%17 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0324%14 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0718%13 Sept
dust213–70.0532%6 Sept
mirage9–130.0033%6 Sept
dust213–30.1129%28 Aug
mirage13–100.0411%28 Aug
dust212–12-0.0312%25 Aug
dust20–9-0.1014%25 Aug
mirage13–80.0332%25 Aug
ancient13–80.0119%22 Aug
cache7–130.0722%22 Aug
mirage0–13-0.020%22 Aug
dust213–70.0635%22 Aug
mirage13–30.1743%22 Aug
dust23–13-0.0750%22 Aug
mirage0–13-0.010%22 Aug
ancient13–50.0934%21 Aug
dust29–13-0.0417%15 Aug
inferno13–30.0424%15 Aug
inferno7–130.0124%15 Aug
dust213–80.1141%13 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0712%9 Aug
anubis1–50.0231%6 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0619%6 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0413%1 Aug
inferno0–9-0.290%1 Aug
inferno1–9-0.1122%1 Aug
mirage8–130.0532%26 Jul
dust214–160.0426%26 Jul
ancient4–130.0024%26 Jul
mirage16–130.0825%25 Jul
dust213–5-0.0213%24 Jul
nuke3–130.0131%24 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0413%24 Jul
dust23–13-0.0421%17 Jul
inferno13–30.0416%10 Jul
dust213–60.0726%10 Jul
dust213–110.0526%3 Jul
overpass13–80.0422%21 Jun
ancient13–60.0235%21 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0226%21 Jun
dust213–30.0835%21 Jun
cache13–6-0.0215%23 May
mirage13–4-0.0312%11 May
mirage9–13-0.0116%11 May
cache13–50.0610%10 May
inferno5–0-0.0333%10 May
cache13–60.0123%10 May
inferno10–130.0115%9 May
mirage13–50.1413%8 May
cache12–12-0.1012%4 May
inferno10–130.0211%1 May
overpass13–10.087%1 May
mirage13–50.2025%1 May
dust25–13-0.087%1 May
inferno13–6-0.0211%22 Apr
inferno8–130.0029%17 Apr
dust29–13-0.0638%17 Apr
mirage13–40.0216%17 Apr
ancient13–10.1232%17 Apr
inferno14–160.0018%15 Apr
dust213–110.0441%15 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0018%15 Apr
ancient13–40.0136%13 Apr
dust213–80.0050%13 Apr
inferno13–30.0233%13 Apr
ancient6–130.0315%13 Apr
dust213–40.0712%13 Apr
mirage13–40.0517%12 Apr
mirage13–70.0518%12 Apr
ancient8–20.040%12 Apr
dust213–60.0537%10 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0229%8 Apr
mirage13–30.1811%8 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0515%7 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0614%25 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0121%23 Mar
mirage0–13-0.0616%23 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0216%21 Mar
mirage9–130.059%19 Mar
mirage9–130.0719%19 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0612%19 Mar
mirage4–130.0620%19 Mar
mirage13–60.0527%18 Mar
dust216–130.0320%17 Mar
mirage13–110.0419%17 Mar
mirage13–110.0523%16 Mar
mirage9–13-0.028%15 Mar
mirage10–13-0.019%14 Mar
mirage7–130.0625%13 Mar
overpass13–9-0.0011%13 Mar
mirage13–90.0323%12 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0139%6 Mar
dust210–130.0326%1 Mar
inferno6–130.0322%27 Feb
mirage13–70.0932%27 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0328%25 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0422%18 Feb
dust213–20.1040%18 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →