Kitņiks

Kitņiks — CS2 Stats

LV76561198880103021[U:1:919837293]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,135Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating26,162Top 10% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12784 of 261571 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,874 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Nov 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,162 +6,502 20 Jul – 8 Nov · 33 days played
19,66026,189peak 26,18920 Jul8 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,874 +0 19 Sept – 22 Oct · 4 observations
1,8741,874peak 1,87419 Sept22 Oct
26,220Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,874Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-07-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,874
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 127 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 27 below peak (26,189)
  • +4,201 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,838 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKitņiksFACEITLevel 10 · 1,874 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,162 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,874csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning54
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–39–4Last 10057%Win rateWLLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −8.4pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 511ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility5.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time528ms−88ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 26.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 12 Aug →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 28 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · anubis, 24 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 5 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
14–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 64% over 22anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2214–864%0.03
dust2A1811–761%0.04
infernoA1810–856%0.03
cacheB137–654%0.06
anubisC104–640%0.01
nukeA106–460%-0.01
ancientA95–456%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

618Matches
53%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
79.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3661%1.1616.0
Ancient1662%1.0517.9
Nuke1369%1.1215.9
Dust21164%1.0916.2
Anubis956%1.3715.9
Inferno862%1.0015.1
Cache475%1.7615.0
Overpass250%0.7011.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.9%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
527msReaction time
58.8%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
9.31HE damage / grenade
10.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–70.0110%8 Nov →
cache7–130.0334%7 Nov →
anubis8–13-0.0028%6 Nov →
mirage16–13-0.0217%31 Oct →
anubis13–60.0216%31 Oct →
anubis6–130.0115%24 Oct →
mirage10–130.0220%30 Sept →
mirage16–140.0316%27 Sept →
inferno13–110.0216%27 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0115%26 Sept →
mirage13–90.0032%26 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0510%26 Sept →
inferno3–9-0.0715%22 Sept →
nuke8–80.0227%22 Sept →
inferno9–10.1643%22 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0227%22 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0329%22 Sept →
dust20–13-0.1027%19 Sept →
mirage16–130.0025%19 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0538%12 Sept →
nuke13–70.0421%7 Sept →
cache16–130.0134%7 Sept →
anubis10–130.0416%2 Sept →
ancient13–80.048%25 Aug →
dust21–130.0420%25 Aug →
dust213–90.0525%25 Aug →
ancient13–70.0533%20 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0226%20 Aug →
inferno11–130.0320%20 Aug →
inferno13–80.0431%19 Aug →
cache13–40.1119%16 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0333%16 Aug →
cache13–40.1930%12 Aug →
dust213–70.0518%12 Aug →
dust216–140.0434%12 Aug →
inferno2–9-0.1633%12 Aug →
nuke1–9-0.1820%12 Aug →
inferno5–90.0022%12 Aug →
mirage13–80.0527%11 Aug →
anubis13–80.0528%11 Aug →
mirage13–80.0727%10 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0225%10 Aug →
dust211–130.0326%10 Aug →
nuke9–7-0.0332%10 Aug →
cache13–110.0626%7 Aug →
dust213–100.0543%7 Aug →
mirage13–100.0227%7 Aug →
inferno9–60.1525%7 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0416%7 Aug →
cache13–100.1933%5 Aug →
ancient10–130.0531%5 Aug →
cache5–130.0322%5 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0132%5 Aug →
mirage8–130.0332%5 Aug →
cache9–130.0620%5 Aug →
inferno13–10.1129%5 Aug →
dust213–30.1337%5 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0632%5 Aug →
inferno4–9-0.0040%5 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0215%2 Aug →
anubis13–110.0520%2 Aug →
dust213–70.0337%2 Aug →
inferno13–90.0326%2 Aug →
ancient13–90.0619%2 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0715%2 Aug →
inferno13–110.0321%1 Aug →
cache9–130.0420%1 Aug →
dust216–140.0111%1 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0615%1 Aug →
anubis13–6-0.0220%1 Aug →
inferno16–130.0521%1 Aug →
nuke8–130.0735%1 Aug →
mirage13–90.1128%30 Jul →
dust211–130.0746%28 Jul →
anubis10–130.0225%28 Jul →
mirage8–130.0848%28 Jul →
mirage13–110.0433%27 Jul →
inferno16–130.1022%27 Jul →
mirage4–130.0636%27 Jul →
nuke13–100.0026%26 Jul →
cache8–130.0423%26 Jul →
dust213–110.0526%26 Jul →
dust216–140.0933%26 Jul →
mirage10–130.0024%25 Jul →
mirage15–150.0013%24 Jul →
nuke13–20.0144%23 Jul →
inferno11–130.0521%23 Jul →
mirage13–110.0822%23 Jul →
mirage13–50.0632%22 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0323%21 Jul →
dust213–70.1327%21 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0523%21 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0113%20 Jul →
inferno8–80.0116%18 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0020%18 Jul →
mirage13–110.0122%17 Jul →
cache13–60.0429%15 Jul →
dust23–130.1030%15 Jul →
mirage13–70.1045%15 Jul →
ancient13–90.0928%15 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.