Brens

Brens — CS2 Stats

LV76561198875641022[U:1:915375294]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,664Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,075 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 4,664 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 39 days played since 5 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,541 +135 7 Nov26 Jun · 16 days played
25,91127,077peak 27,0777 Nov26 Jun
Faceit ELO: 3,075 +0 29 Aug3 Sept · 4 observations
3,0753,075peak 3,07529 Aug3 Sept
27,077Peak Premier in tracked matches
3,075Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2025-08-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,075
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 425 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBrensFACEITLevel 10 · 3,075 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO3,075csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning61
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53443Last 10053%Win rateLWLWTWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility5.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.0
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning6.1
Utility5.6
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time535ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 27.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–5 · cache, 1 Jun
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 28 Feb
398msFastest reaction time · 16–13 · nuke, 27 Jul
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 12 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35171849%0.04
dust2C2281436%0.04
ancientS129375%0.02
nukeB115645%0.01
anubisS64267%0.05
inferno42250%0.01
train42250%0.07
cache330100%0.12
overpass330100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8,427Matches
54%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
83.4ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
23Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage55454%1.1716.0
Anubis32454%1.1015.1
Ancient26153%1.1316.1
Dust214745%1.0616.7
Vertigo13855%1.1516.0
Nuke12257%1.1617.2
Inferno5267%1.3118.6
Overpass1856%1.1416.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.0%Spray accuracy
88.7%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
524msReaction time
31.6%T opening success
59.6%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
7.7%Flash assists
8.54HE damage / grenade
8.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.5963% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.0924%27 Jul
nuke16–130.0329%27 Jul
mirage7–9-0.0319%27 Jul
mirage13–80.0922%20 Jul
mirage15–150.1130%20 Jul
mirage13–50.0738%20 Jul
cache13–50.0735%27 Jun
anubis13–100.0224%26 Jun
inferno10–130.0420%26 Jun
dust210–130.0822%26 Jun
mirage13–80.1226%16 Jun
dust28–130.0429%16 Jun
dust213–8-0.0324%16 Jun
anubis13–90.0234%16 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0419%13 Jun
nuke7–13-0.069%13 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0419%13 Jun
nuke7–13-0.069%13 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0017%13 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0734%13 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0017%13 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0538%12 Jun
nuke19–22-0.0218%12 Jun
mirage13–70.0516%12 Jun
dust24–13-0.0540%12 Jun
mirage13–70.0416%12 Jun
mirage11–130.0525%11 Jun
anubis13–70.1433%1 Jun
cache13–50.2133%1 Jun
cache13–110.0727%22 May
train12–120.1430%28 Apr
dust213–80.0331%10 Apr
overpass13–70.1017%7 Apr
dust21–5-0.0050%7 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0216%7 Apr
mirage9–130.0027%7 Apr
mirage8–130.0031%7 Apr
mirage16–140.0432%7 Apr
train10–130.0733%3 Apr
nuke11–130.0338%28 Mar
ancient16–130.0626%5 Mar
anubis11–130.0821%5 Mar
inferno3–13-0.0241%2 Mar
anubis5–130.0425%2 Mar
ancient13–4-0.0653%28 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0538%28 Feb
inferno13–80.0634%28 Feb
mirage11–130.0726%24 Feb
dust213–70.0924%24 Feb
mirage13–90.0733%24 Feb
dust23–13-0.0721%14 Feb
mirage13–70.0429%14 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0417%14 Feb
mirage13–30.1238%9 Feb
dust26–130.0234%1 Feb
dust24–130.1318%1 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0136%27 Jan
ancient13–90.0219%26 Jan
dust213–30.0228%26 Jan
dust214–160.0018%24 Jan
mirage9–130.1028%24 Jan
mirage13–80.0313%24 Jan
nuke13–60.0823%23 Jan
anubis13–30.0528%23 Jan
ancient13–60.0626%23 Jan
dust213–20.0629%23 Jan
mirage13–40.0117%23 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0142%23 Jan
overpass13–100.0519%22 Jan
mirage13–30.1532%22 Jan
dust27–130.0226%17 Jan
dust25–130.1042%17 Jan
train13–9-0.0121%16 Jan
dust213–60.0323%16 Jan
mirage5–13-0.0219%18 Nov
mirage11–130.0024%13 Nov
ancient13–110.0826%9 Nov
train13–110.0830%9 Nov
mirage8–130.0636%9 Nov
dust29–130.0922%8 Nov
nuke12–120.0819%8 Nov
ancient13–90.1622%8 Nov
mirage8–130.0122%8 Nov
ancient10–130.1135%8 Nov
ancient13–11-0.0220%8 Nov
nuke13–40.0929%8 Nov
ancient4–13-0.0427%8 Nov
nuke13–40.0352%7 Nov
dust213–16-0.0215%7 Nov
dust213–100.0430%7 Nov
mirage7–00.0935%7 Nov
ancient13–110.0325%7 Nov
dust27–130.0830%7 Nov
nuke13–90.0132%7 Nov
overpass16–140.0425%6 Nov
mirage13–30.1826%1 Nov
inferno16–14-0.0426%30 Oct
dust23–13-0.0122%7 Oct
mirage13–70.0922%5 Aug
dust213–20.1621%5 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →