xyta

xyta — CS2 Stats

76561198875201165[U:1:914935437]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

894Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,168Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 13 Sep 2026 and 18 Sep 2026.

Measured 13 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning58
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6139Last 10061%Win rateWLLWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.9pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility4.2
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.8
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time576ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy27.8%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 26.3% → last ⅓ avg 27.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · overpass, 14 Dec
62%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · train, 2 Jan
406msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · mirage, 1 Feb
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 9 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 84% over 19infernoWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB39211854%0.01
overpassS2115671%0.01
nukeS1916384%0.02
infernoB115645%0.00
train3030%-0.03
dust231233%-0.02
anubis220100%-0.03
vertigo21150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

32,729Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of tracked players
1,028Matches
51.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
65.3%Headshot % · Top 5% of tracked players
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
2,623MVPs
1,168Hours (in match)
1,005Bombs planted
539Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,252inferno
1,703nuke
691dust2
528train
370vertigo
6ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

878Matches
55%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
71.9ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage23351%1.0014.8
Overpass9266%1.1215.3
Nuke9060%1.0514.6
Inferno8151%1.0114.8
Anubis2948%1.0215.6
Dust22232%0.7814.7
Cache1573%1.4216.8
Train1250%0.7612.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.5%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.0%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
575msReaction time
43.2%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
9.18HE damage / grenade
4.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–5-0.0326%11 Aug
nuke12–16-0.0413%6 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0717%16 Jun
inferno13–90.0233%15 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0125%11 Jun
overpass11–130.0232%8 May
mirage16–13-0.0225%24 Mar
overpass13–10-0.0213%20 Mar
mirage13–50.1017%19 Mar
mirage13–40.0222%19 Mar
overpass13–7-0.0329%9 Mar
mirage13–80.0116%26 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0626%23 Feb
nuke13–60.1253%19 Feb
mirage13–50.0422%18 Feb
nuke13–90.0524%17 Feb
mirage14–160.0221%15 Feb
mirage13–6-0.0133%10 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0522%9 Feb
nuke13–30.0335%9 Feb
mirage13–1-0.0029%9 Feb
nuke13–80.0329%5 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0223%1 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0721%30 Jan
overpass9–13-0.0339%27 Jan
nuke13–90.0524%15 Jan
overpass13–50.0325%12 Jan
nuke19–170.0337%11 Jan
mirage13–50.0931%8 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0133%8 Jan
overpass13–11-0.0133%5 Jan
inferno8–130.0331%2 Jan
train7–13-0.0362%2 Jan
mirage11–130.0130%2 Jan
nuke13–90.0327%1 Jan
inferno14–160.0025%1 Jan
mirage13–100.0542%31 Dec
overpass13–110.0132%30 Dec
nuke16–140.0422%30 Dec
inferno13–10.1130%30 Dec
mirage11–00.0625%30 Dec
overpass13–20.1434%14 Dec
overpass13–90.0130%8 Dec
overpass13–20.0823%23 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0340%23 Nov
inferno13–9-0.0423%20 Nov
nuke13–100.0518%15 Nov
mirage7–13-0.0333%15 Nov
dust26–130.0534%15 Nov
inferno13–60.0735%15 Nov
mirage10–130.0017%15 Nov
mirage19–170.0330%15 Nov
nuke10–13-0.0618%12 Nov
train4–13-0.0144%9 Nov
overpass13–30.0119%9 Nov
mirage9–13-0.0531%9 Nov
overpass13–50.0437%9 Nov
overpass19–170.0018%5 Nov
mirage9–130.0633%4 Nov
train11–13-0.0523%2 Nov
mirage13–100.0041%2 Nov
mirage13–8-0.0325%2 Nov
mirage13–10-0.0217%2 Nov
nuke13–90.0126%2 Nov
mirage6–13-0.0323%2 Nov
nuke13–90.0326%1 Nov
mirage8–130.0519%1 Nov
nuke16–13-0.0225%28 Oct
mirage13–40.1115%26 Oct
mirage11–130.0133%26 Oct
dust213–6-0.0238%26 Oct
nuke13–11-0.0132%19 Oct
mirage13–90.0516%19 Oct
mirage25–230.0125%10 Oct
mirage3–13-0.0332%14 Sept
mirage13–80.0340%13 Sept
mirage8–130.0318%12 Sept
overpass13–80.0128%12 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0218%9 Sept
dust28–13-0.0812%29 Apr
anubis16–13-0.0426%4 Apr
nuke13–110.0117%27 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0053%9 Mar
mirage13–80.0335%9 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0614%9 Mar
overpass17–19-0.0330%8 Mar
vertigo3–13-0.0524%8 Mar
nuke13–50.1022%8 Mar
overpass13–60.0031%7 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0219%7 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0832%7 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0018%7 Mar
mirage13–80.0222%6 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0526%6 Mar
overpass13–40.0829%6 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0531%5 Mar
anubis13–5-0.0214%5 Mar
overpass13–50.0327%5 Mar
vertigo13–5-0.0316%4 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0450%4 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →