zfe

zfe — CS2 Stats

FI76561198875191173[U:1:914925445]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,129Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,894Purple band · top ~20.9% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−60Premier CS Rating · 16,954 → 16,894

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,894 -154 27 Aug – 14 Oct · 36 days played
15,80818,182peak 18,18227 Aug14 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,821 +0 31 Aug – 1 Sept · 2 observations
1,8211,821peak 1,82131 Aug1 Sept
18,182Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,821Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,821
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 180 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,288 below peak (18,182)
  • +1,067 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,106 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzfePREMIER16,894 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,821csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning76
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–57–2Last 10041%Win rateLWWLWWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · −49ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.11
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 478ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility6.0
Positioning7.6
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 80% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 11.2° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 80% on T to 46% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning7.6
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels7.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time544ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 6–0 · ancient, 13 Oct →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · cache, 13 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · mirage, 28 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 53% over 19anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2312–1152%0.04
mirageB1910–953%0.02
dust2D155–1033%0.02
infernoB136–746%0.02
cacheD134–931%0.02
ancientD92–722%0.05
anubisD50–50%0.01
vertigo—32–167%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,364Matches
51%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
76.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16450%1.2416.3
Nuke11461%1.3417.9
Vertigo7868%1.3616.9
Inferno6748%1.2115.6
Ancient6546%1.2315.3
Anubis5740%1.1817.1
Dust23033%1.2716.4
Overpass2741%1.0714.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
47.7%Spray accuracy
77.0%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
540msReaction time
79.6%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
10.9%Flash assists
9.74HE damage / grenade
9.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.1221%14 Oct →
dust213–110.0728%14 Oct →
dust213–100.0927%13 Oct →
cache11–130.0524%13 Oct →
ancient6–00.2324%13 Oct →
nuke13–60.0714%13 Oct →
mirage13–100.0924%12 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0141%12 Oct →
dust25–130.0029%12 Oct →
cache8–130.1412%11 Oct →
inferno12–160.0924%11 Oct →
mirage13–50.0924%9 Oct →
nuke13–40.0639%9 Oct →
mirage13–160.0110%9 Oct →
dust27–130.0633%9 Oct →
ancient11–130.0523%9 Oct →
mirage8–130.0419%8 Oct →
nuke13–30.0319%6 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0319%6 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0024%6 Oct →
vertigo5–13-0.0114%4 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0119%3 Oct →
nuke13–70.1027%3 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0117%3 Oct →
mirage11–130.076%3 Oct →
nuke13–50.0947%3 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0526%2 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.1033%2 Oct →
nuke14–160.0128%1 Oct →
mirage16–140.0714%1 Oct →
dust29–130.0325%29 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0328%29 Sept →
nuke10–130.0432%28 Sept →
anubis6–130.0327%28 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0917%27 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0313%27 Sept →
nuke4–90.0520%27 Sept →
dust211–130.069%26 Sept →
nuke13–10.220%26 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0322%26 Sept →
anubis8–130.048%26 Sept →
mirage13–50.1036%26 Sept →
ancient11–130.1623%26 Sept →
nuke13–110.1518%26 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0313%25 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0420%25 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0515%24 Sept →
ancient4–130.0845%23 Sept →
nuke5–130.1131%23 Sept →
inferno13–90.1730%23 Sept →
cache13–70.0232%22 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0520%22 Sept →
mirage13–60.0743%22 Sept →
dust210–130.0320%22 Sept →
nuke4–130.0118%21 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0517%21 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0422%21 Sept →
inferno13–20.0533%19 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0619%19 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0436%18 Sept →
nuke13–90.0832%18 Sept →
nuke7–130.0339%14 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0226%14 Sept →
cache7–130.0255%13 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0633%13 Sept →
cache13–70.1437%13 Sept →
dust210–130.0336%13 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0221%12 Sept →
nuke13–50.0645%11 Sept →
cache10–130.0523%11 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0822%10 Sept →
vertigo13–30.1015%10 Sept →
vertigo13–40.0121%9 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0621%9 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0017%9 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0121%8 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0218%8 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0423%7 Sept →
inferno9–40.0829%7 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0235%5 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0114%3 Sept →
dust216–140.0029%2 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0217%2 Sept →
anubis8–130.0126%2 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0538%1 Sept →
mirage13–110.0229%1 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0018%1 Sept →
cache10–130.0132%31 Aug →
cache11–130.0628%31 Aug →
nuke15–150.0618%30 Aug →
ancient7–130.0330%30 Aug →
nuke13–50.0113%29 Aug →
mirage13–90.1221%29 Aug →
anubis5–130.0729%29 Aug →
dust213–110.0516%29 Aug →
mirage9–20.0426%29 Aug →
ancient13–160.0328%29 Aug →
dust210–130.0323%28 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.1117%28 Aug →
inferno13–110.0918%27 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.