Rankaisija

Rankaisija — CS2 Stats

FI76561198874980782[U:1:914715054]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,346Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#77066 of 233152 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 7 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 -3,416 7 Feb18 Sept · 36 days played
19,42623,726peak 23,7267 Feb18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,055 +0 1 Sept14 Sept · 3 observations
2,0552,055peak 2,0551 Sept14 Sept
23,969Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,055Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-02-07

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,055
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 445 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,727 below peak (23,726)
  • -2,360 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRankaisijaPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandPEAK ELO2,055csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning56
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44533Last 10044%Win rateWLWWLWTWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +102ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 717ms

Last 10

  • 622 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 695ms

Last 20

  • 1172 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility5.7
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.6
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time617ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%−3.9%
first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–7 · mirage, 30 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · dust2, 20 Mar
438msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 5 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 15 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
915In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 10infernoWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC42182443%-0.01
dust2C1661038%-0.02
ancientB136746%-0.02
infernoD113827%-0.02
nukeS108280%-0.01
anubis31233%-0.01
cache2020%-0.05
overpass21150%0.04
train110100%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,465Matches
52%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
69.2ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage34454%0.9313.8
Dust214648%0.8713.2
Nuke11965%1.0314.8
Inferno11047%0.8613.2
Ancient9148%0.9314.8
Anubis7256%0.9313.9
Overpass4652%0.9414.4
Train2654%0.8813.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy
30.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
613msReaction time
44.7%T opening success
34.3%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
9.09HE damage / grenade
11.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.2862% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–12-0.0820%18 Sept
ancient9–130.0014%18 Sept
mirage13–110.0827%16 Sept
mirage13–60.0028%16 Sept
ancient7–6-0.0625%15 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0129%14 Sept
mirage15–150.0331%14 Sept
dust213–11-0.0221%13 Sept
dust216–130.0622%13 Sept
nuke15–150.0119%9 Sept
anubis11–130.0324%9 Sept
mirage13–40.0415%9 Sept
nuke13–60.0423%8 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0223%8 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0921%7 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0423%7 Sept
dust211–13-0.0117%7 Sept
mirage7–30.0035%7 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0523%7 Sept
inferno9–130.0329%6 Sept
nuke6–1-0.0143%6 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0320%5 Sept
dust23–13-0.050%5 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0528%5 Sept
mirage13–70.0728%5 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0516%5 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0123%4 Sept
mirage13–60.0114%4 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0324%4 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0515%4 Sept
ancient5–13-0.1220%3 Sept
dust211–13-0.0522%2 Sept
dust213–80.0528%2 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0624%1 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0837%30 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0928%30 Aug
mirage13–70.1127%30 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0121%29 Aug
dust23–13-0.0716%29 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0229%29 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0236%29 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0226%28 Aug
mirage14–160.0017%16 Aug
cache14–160.0029%16 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0425%15 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0912%15 Aug
nuke13–10.0018%15 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0221%14 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0126%14 Aug
dust20–8-0.0533%14 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0524%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0027%25 Jul
nuke13–80.0319%25 Jul
dust213–11-0.0226%18 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0016%18 Jul
dust24–13-0.0131%17 Jul
cache3–13-0.1132%17 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0327%18 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0223%18 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0030%18 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0640%16 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0126%14 Jun
dust212–16-0.0628%13 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0417%13 Jun
nuke13–100.0528%13 Jun
inferno13–50.0422%13 Jun
dust213–110.0325%29 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0023%23 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0126%22 Apr
mirage10–130.0021%3 Apr
dust214–16-0.0927%30 Mar
inferno13–16-0.0211%30 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0519%30 Mar
mirage0–5-0.090%29 Mar
overpass9–130.0220%28 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0325%20 Mar
dust22–0-0.00100%20 Mar
ancient16–14-0.0329%20 Mar
train13–10-0.0618%18 Mar
mirage13–30.0045%18 Mar
ancient16–140.0228%18 Mar
mirage13–110.0424%18 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0134%18 Mar
dust210–130.0231%16 Mar
mirage13–40.0052%16 Mar
mirage0–3-0.0625%16 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0529%12 Mar
mirage1–6-0.090%12 Mar
overpass13–20.0620%10 Mar
mirage14–160.0127%9 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0420%7 Mar
dust211–13-0.0224%6 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0131%26 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0713%26 Feb
inferno14–16-0.0422%24 Feb
ancient13–00.0730%15 Feb
anubis11–130.0224%14 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0530%12 Feb
mirage13–50.0324%9 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0124%7 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →