FigX

FigX — CS2 Stats

LV76561198869934736[U:1:909669008]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

749Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,436Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,302 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,302 → 2,302
+4Tracked matches · now 749
−10.0ppWin rate · 66.7% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 59 days played since 6 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,989 +5,835 12 Nov19 Apr · 13 days played
11,15416,989peak 16,98912 Nov19 Apr
Faceit ELO: 2,302 +0 31 Aug18 Sept · 3 observations
2,3022,302peak 2,30231 Aug18 Sept
16,989Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,302Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
59Days played since 2025-11-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,302
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 198 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=27,259), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate56.1%51.0%
Shot accuracy2.8%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.011.09
Match win rate47.4%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFigXFACEITLevel 10 · 2,302 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,302csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning63
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60364Last 10060%Win rateLLLWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −5.4pp headshot accuracy · −97ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 442ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.2
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.3
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time573ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy25.0%+5.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.42Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 30 Mar
100%Best headshot accuracy · 6–1 · dust2, 11 Jul
367msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · dust2, 28 Nov
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 17 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
94In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9nukeWeakest map · 50% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2012860%0.01
mirageS1712571%0.02
ancientA138562%0.03
infernoA127558%-0.00
anubisS97278%0.00
nukeB84450%0.02
officeB63350%0.02
vertigoS64267%0.12
train41325%-0.02
overpass31233%0.01
cache21150%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,514Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
1,488Matches
47.4%Match win rate
56.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players
2.8%Shot accuracy
5,818MVPs
892Hours (in match)
2,071Bombs planted
1,610Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,603dust2
1,367inferno
939nuke
880train
321vertigo
122office
21cbble
16assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

607Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
78.3ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14046%1.1414.4
Ancient13956%1.1615.6
Dust213348%1.0614.8
Anubis6067%1.2217.0
Nuke5347%1.0915.9
Inferno3650%1.1014.7
Train3367%1.3415.1
Overpass40%0.6011.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
74.8%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
563msReaction time
41.1%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
5.23HE damage / grenade
6.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4886 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–130.0831%18 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0019%18 Sept
dust21–13-0.0550%18 Sept
ancient13–10.0831%17 Sept
mirage10–13-0.004%14 Sept
ancient13–90.0821%7 Aug
nuke13–110.0320%30 Jul
dust216–12-0.0417%16 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0324%16 Jul
office6–13-0.0319%13 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0335%11 Jul
dust26–1-0.02100%11 Jul
train13–40.0522%19 Jun
train10–13-0.0116%19 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0122%12 Jun
cache8–130.0722%4 Jun
inferno0–9-0.2525%4 Jun
vertigo13–70.0111%4 Jun
vertigo13–4-0.0121%4 Jun
inferno3–9-0.0218%26 May
ancient10–130.0314%20 May
dust213–90.0422%18 May
office13–10-0.0238%13 May
office10–130.1027%13 May
cache13–50.0421%9 May
inferno13–110.0423%4 May
mirage6–13-0.0429%30 Apr
ancient13–50.0822%29 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0227%27 Apr
train5–13-0.0614%22 Apr
anubis16–130.0622%19 Apr
mirage13–90.1016%19 Apr
nuke5–9-0.0523%18 Apr
mirage13–110.0021%18 Apr
ancient13–40.1020%16 Apr
inferno6–9-0.118%12 Apr
dust213–80.0333%12 Apr
ancient13–90.0926%12 Apr
vertigo8–130.0418%12 Apr
dust213–80.0127%11 Apr
inferno9–70.1229%5 Apr
anubis5–1-0.0033%5 Apr
anubis8–130.0215%5 Apr
dust215–150.0434%5 Apr
vertigo9–10.4215%30 Mar
mirage13–1-0.0217%30 Mar
mirage13–80.1620%30 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0347%20 Mar
office13–40.0222%20 Mar
office8–130.0426%20 Mar
nuke7–130.0625%19 Mar
mirage13–20.1527%19 Mar
dust211–13-0.0630%13 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0411%9 Mar
nuke13–40.0332%22 Feb
anubis13–8-0.039%22 Feb
dust213–9-0.0116%3 Feb
ancient8–130.0017%3 Feb
inferno9–40.3124%1 Feb
dust27–130.0625%1 Feb
mirage14–160.0519%31 Jan
mirage13–100.0123%15 Jan
anubis13–8-0.0422%11 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0431%7 Jan
overpass13–2-0.0414%7 Jan
dust213–110.0218%7 Jan
mirage13–11-0.1023%3 Jan
train3–13-0.0711%3 Jan
mirage11–130.0325%2 Jan
dust213–70.0333%2 Jan
dust210–13-0.056%26 Dec
mirage13–7-0.0122%26 Dec
dust215–150.0319%22 Dec
dust213–20.0128%17 Dec
vertigo13–20.1324%17 Dec
nuke13–10.0333%14 Dec
anubis13–90.0418%14 Dec
dust24–100.0022%14 Dec
overpass7–130.0319%9 Dec
vertigo8–80.1318%4 Dec
nuke2–130.0227%3 Dec
ancient8–13-0.0123%30 Nov
dust213–80.1323%30 Nov
dust213–4-0.0131%28 Nov
anubis13–110.0023%28 Nov
mirage3–0-0.030%28 Nov
office13–110.0432%28 Nov
mirage13–80.018%21 Nov
inferno9–10.036%20 Nov
nuke13–7-0.0517%20 Nov
overpass5–130.0417%19 Nov
ancient13–10.0115%19 Nov
dust213–20.0417%15 Nov
mirage13–40.0723%15 Nov
nuke8–80.1125%14 Nov
inferno5–9-0.159%14 Nov
ancient13–80.0424%13 Nov
inferno13–8-0.0222%12 Nov
mirage13–11-0.0117%9 Nov
inferno9–40.0624%6 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →