Choppyz

Choppyz — CS2 Stats

76561198862526892[U:1:902261164]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

706Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating20,448Top 50% of 203,724 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#74348 of 250916 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,349 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,448 +108 29 Aug – 6 Oct · 21 days played
19,35422,176peak 22,17629 Aug6 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,349 +0 29 Aug – 18 Sept · 4 observations
1,3491,349peak 1,34929 Aug18 Sept
22,535Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,349Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
19Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,349
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 2 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,728 below peak (22,176)
  • -988 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,552 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChoppyzFACEITLevel 6 · 1,349 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER20,448 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,349csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim41
Positioning46
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateLWWWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.2pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim4.1
Utility5.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.1
Positioning4.6
Utility5.9
Mechanics2.4
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time545ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 538ms → last ⅓ avg 545ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%+4.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–10 · nuke, 5 Oct →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · ancient, 6 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 8 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 15anubisWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2211–1150%-0.01
ancientA2112–957%-0.02
dust2A159–660%-0.01
nukeA127–558%-0.00
cacheB105–550%-0.01
anubisC94–544%-0.01
mirageC94–544%0.00
office—20–20%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,083Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
74.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno15156%1.1215.6
Ancient11349%1.0815.8
Anubis10348%1.1015.3
Dust28856%1.0515.1
Nuke8252%1.1115.1
Mirage7942%1.0415.7
Cache3644%0.9514.1
Vertigo3560%1.3117.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
60.6%Counter-strafing
13.7°Preaim
549msReaction time
37.4%T opening success
35.1%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
6.18HE damage / grenade
16.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.7483° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke6–13-0.0615%6 Oct →
inferno13–80.0112%6 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0229%6 Oct →
nuke13–90.0025%6 Oct →
dust213–80.0014%6 Oct →
ancient13–50.0360%6 Oct →
ancient9–130.0412%6 Oct →
nuke13–100.1121%5 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0110%2 Oct →
dust213–80.0223%2 Oct →
dust213–70.0110%2 Oct →
inferno7–130.0325%2 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0621%2 Oct →
office5–13-0.0223%2 Oct →
inferno11–1-0.0314%30 Sept →
mirage13–50.0614%30 Sept →
inferno8–130.0013%29 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0526%29 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0219%29 Sept →
mirage10–130.0016%28 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0318%28 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0829%28 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0122%28 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0219%27 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0513%27 Sept →
ancient16–130.0522%27 Sept →
nuke13–110.0317%26 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0318%26 Sept →
dust213–80.0228%26 Sept →
mirage7–130.0218%26 Sept →
inferno13–90.0523%26 Sept →
dust25–130.0124%26 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0121%26 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0019%26 Sept →
nuke13–3-0.0414%26 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0315%26 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.1113%26 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0519%26 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0017%25 Sept →
inferno13–50.0117%25 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0419%25 Sept →
mirage10–130.0225%25 Sept →
mirage13–70.0218%25 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0621%25 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0316%25 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.068%25 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0510%25 Sept →
inferno3–130.0021%25 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0220%19 Sept →
nuke13–80.0729%19 Sept →
inferno13–20.0913%19 Sept →
dust213–50.0728%19 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0311%19 Sept →
anubis12–160.0219%19 Sept →
ancient13–70.0214%19 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0222%19 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0314%19 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0216%19 Sept →
cache13–20.0818%19 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0411%17 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0513%17 Sept →
anubis8–130.0321%17 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0311%17 Sept →
nuke14–16-0.0120%17 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0618%17 Sept →
inferno11–130.0019%17 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0524%17 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0713%17 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0112%16 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0018%16 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0216%16 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0422%11 Sept →
dust26–13-0.1019%10 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0325%9 Sept →
dust213–80.0418%9 Sept →
nuke13–60.0022%9 Sept →
ancient13–100.0221%9 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0123%9 Sept →
anubis13–160.0114%9 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0322%9 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0518%9 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0018%9 Sept →
ancient0–10-0.074%9 Sept →
cache13–90.0515%9 Sept →
dust213–90.0513%8 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0210%8 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0115%8 Sept →
office0–3-0.130%8 Sept →
mirage16–140.0218%8 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0319%7 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0513%4 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0212%4 Sept →
inferno13–80.0924%4 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0714%3 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0320%3 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0317%3 Sept →
ancient13–110.0214%3 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0219%3 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0520%3 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0011%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.