d1Ledez

d1Ledez — CS2 Stats

PROBetBoom TeamRussiaRiflerSettings & gear profile →

76561198859428279[U:1:899162551]Steam profile ↗

2,533Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,927 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGd1LedezFACEITLevel 10 · 3,927 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning56
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6634Last 10066%Win rateLLLWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.5
Aggression4.6
Utility6.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning5.6
Utility6.0
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time453ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 448ms → last ⅓ avg 453ms
Headshot accuracy25.8%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 25.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — cache 13–10
131Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 76% over 17anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2214864%0.01
nukeS2014670%0.01
ancientS1914574%0.02
dust2S1713476%0.02
overpassA95456%0.03
anubisD82625%0.00
inferno43175%0.06
cache110100%0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,272Matches
61%Win rate
1.45Avg K/D
96.1ADR
59%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
25Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage32664%1.5420.2
Ancient19959%1.4519.4
Dust217570%1.4920.2
Anubis17366%1.5520.3
Nuke11767%1.5518.1
Overpass4967%1.4018.4
Inferno3253%1.4619.7
Train2255%1.4420.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Inventory

$7,465Inventory value80ItemsFull inventory breakdown →
★ Butterfly Knife | Doppler (Factory New)$1,828★ Sport Gloves | Pandora's Box (Field-Tested)$1,823Desert Eagle | Blaze (Factory New)$1,025★ Driver Gloves | Snow Leopard (Minimal Wear)$842AK-47 | Vulcan (Minimal Wear)$544M4A1-S | Fade (Factory New)$326

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.0%Headshot accuracy
41.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.1%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
448msReaction time
24.3%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
10.1%Flash assists
4.78HE damage / grenade
11.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.3499% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke3–13-0.0730%14 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0223%14 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0122%12 Aug
dust213–10.0928%11 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0331%11 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0325%10 Jul
mirage10–130.0027%3 Jul
ancient16–130.0527%3 Jul
dust213–6-0.0125%3 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0619%2 Jul
ancient13–40.0627%1 Jul
nuke6–13-0.078%18 Jun
anubis9–130.0533%18 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0319%15 Jun
dust213–7-0.0528%15 Jun
nuke11–130.0026%14 Jun
overpass8–130.0125%14 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0516%13 Jun
dust26–13-0.0126%13 Jun
ancient13–100.0228%12 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0118%12 Jun
dust211–13-0.0233%11 Jun
ancient13–110.0216%11 Jun
mirage13–60.0316%11 Jun
dust29–130.0129%10 Jun
nuke13–70.0058%8 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0128%8 Jun
dust213–80.0532%8 Jun
inferno13–60.0932%8 Jun
dust213–20.0329%7 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0124%6 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0722%6 Jun
ancient13–80.0324%3 Jun
nuke13–20.0323%3 Jun
dust213–40.0633%2 Jun
mirage10–130.1624%18 May
anubis13–20.0380%18 May
dust213–60.0937%18 May
mirage13–80.0529%17 May
nuke13–70.0843%17 May
inferno3–130.1343%17 May
anubis13–50.0638%17 May
ancient11–130.1032%17 May
ancient13–30.1043%16 May
cache13–100.2133%16 May
mirage13–110.0112%4 May
anubis9–13-0.0313%24 Apr
nuke13–90.0215%24 Apr
dust213–7-0.0124%5 Apr
mirage13–110.0620%5 Apr
overpass9–130.0628%5 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0233%5 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0224%4 Apr
mirage13–20.0724%4 Apr
dust213–70.0626%4 Apr
inferno13–20.0135%4 Apr
overpass22–180.0514%4 Apr
nuke13–80.1019%3 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0828%3 Apr
nuke13–50.0342%28 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0328%28 Feb
overpass13–70.0340%28 Feb
nuke13–100.0420%28 Feb
overpass13–50.1519%27 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0631%27 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0222%27 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0625%26 Feb
mirage13–20.0825%26 Feb
nuke6–130.0025%26 Feb
ancient13–80.0327%22 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0216%22 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0227%22 Feb
overpass10–130.0119%22 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0317%22 Feb
ancient13–50.1422%21 Feb
dust213–20.0921%21 Feb
nuke12–160.0118%21 Feb
inferno13–30.000%20 Feb
ancient13–100.0529%20 Feb
overpass13–80.0233%20 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0319%20 Feb
ancient13–60.0533%12 Feb
dust212–10-0.0333%11 Feb
dust21–0-0.100%11 Feb
mirage0–4-0.080%11 Feb
mirage16–140.0124%10 Feb
mirage13–90.0719%10 Feb
mirage13–70.0723%10 Feb
nuke13–80.0117%10 Feb
ancient13–4-0.0217%10 Feb
dust213–70.0139%10 Feb
nuke13–90.0023%10 Feb
ancient11–130.0430%6 Feb
mirage16–12-0.0120%6 Feb
overpass13–110.0123%6 Feb
dust211–130.0521%6 Feb
nuke9–40.0343%6 Feb
mirage13–30.0238%5 Feb
nuke13–90.0125%5 Feb
ancient13–4-0.0418%4 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →