PolarKing666 — CS2 Stats

76561198848628489[U:1:888362761]

483Tracked matches20%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#28345 of 30327 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,736 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1,736Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,736
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 15 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPolarKing666FACEITLevel 8 · 1,736 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,736csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning43
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD34651Last 10034%Win rateWLLLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression3.7
Utility4.9
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.6
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.3
Utility4.9
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time631ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 16–19
133Biggest win — dust2
3Longest win streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 42% over 24ancientWeakest map · 8% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D41142734%-0.01
mirageC24101442%0.00
ancientD121118%-0.03
infernoC104640%-0.02
nukeC52340%-0.02
anubis41325%-0.03
overpass2020%-0.02
cache220100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (8% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,260Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
73.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust216250%1.1316.4
Mirage12747%1.0415.2
Ancient5947%0.9113.7
Inferno4955%0.9614.6
Anubis3650%0.9213.9
Nuke2148%1.1814.8
Cache2050%1.0514.0
Overpass933%0.8315.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.6%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
615msReaction time
19.9%T opening success
45.0%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
8.07HE damage / grenade
11.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.8679% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

8% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.0019%28 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0610%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0624%22 Aug
dust25–13-0.0812%30 Jul
dust216–190.1120%28 Jul
dust29–13-0.0426%24 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0226%14 Jul
nuke13–40.0126%13 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0122%12 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0221%8 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0614%3 Jul
dust211–130.0316%2 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0317%1 Jul
mirage7–130.0331%1 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0210%1 Jul
dust210–130.0212%1 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0416%22 Jun
mirage13–80.0625%16 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0118%13 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0613%12 Jun
dust29–13-0.0418%10 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0220%9 Jun
dust26–130.0016%6 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0119%5 Jun
dust213–11-0.0335%5 Jun
ancient8–13-0.066%5 Jun
mirage5–130.0120%5 Jun
dust29–13-0.0116%3 Jun
overpass15–190.0025%2 Jun
mirage9–130.0721%1 Jun
dust25–13-0.0015%1 Jun
mirage13–60.0128%31 May
ancient13–16-0.0410%31 May
mirage9–13-0.0618%28 May
dust23–13-0.0913%25 May
ancient13–80.0419%24 May
dust27–13-0.0116%24 May
dust23–13-0.044%24 May
cache13–9-0.0120%20 May
ancient4–13-0.0916%19 May
dust213–30.0217%19 May
dust213–80.0024%18 May
dust24–13-0.0132%18 May
mirage5–13-0.0516%17 May
dust210–13-0.0118%17 May
dust213–11-0.0136%16 May
inferno15–15-0.0320%16 May
inferno11–13-0.0226%15 May
nuke5–13-0.0224%15 May
mirage12–20.0933%14 May
ancient7–130.0027%12 May
ancient5–13-0.0126%8 May
dust29–13-0.0116%7 May
mirage10–13-0.0319%7 May
dust24–13-0.0818%7 May
dust213–60.0416%7 May
anubis2–6-0.0214%7 May
nuke13–80.0013%7 May
dust24–13-0.0616%6 May
cache13–70.0127%5 May
dust24–13-0.0616%5 May
inferno13–10-0.0119%4 May
inferno12–16-0.077%4 May
dust213–90.0017%4 May
dust213–70.0225%4 May
dust218–22-0.0216%3 May
mirage7–13-0.0436%1 May
inferno3–130.0022%1 May
mirage9–130.0125%28 Apr
anubis2–13-0.0525%25 Apr
dust213–9-0.0320%25 Apr
dust213–10-0.0016%25 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0523%20 Apr
dust213–9-0.0121%20 Apr
mirage13–100.0318%20 Apr
dust213–160.0316%20 Apr
mirage13–110.0326%20 Apr
dust27–13-0.0624%20 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0328%19 Apr
dust216–130.0225%19 Apr
dust27–13-0.059%19 Apr
mirage11–130.0636%18 Apr
dust213–8-0.0413%18 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0121%18 Apr
dust22–13-0.0419%18 Apr
dust27–13-0.0218%18 Apr
dust22–13-0.0926%18 Apr
dust213–80.0421%18 Apr
mirage16–120.0123%17 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0716%17 Apr
mirage13–90.0125%14 Apr
dust213–160.0521%14 Apr
dust213–60.0328%14 Apr
dust210–13-0.0216%14 Apr
mirage13–80.0117%14 Apr
inferno10–130.0121%14 Apr
nuke1–13-0.0415%14 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0523%14 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0318%13 Apr
mirage13–100.0416%13 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →