Pillow

Pillow — CS2 Stats

76561198845636046[U:1:885370318]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,348Tracked matches17%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,209Purple band · top ~15.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,147 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 18,209 → 18,209
0Faceit ELO · 1,147 → 1,147
+2Tracked matches · now 1,348
0.0ppWin rate · 16.7% → 16.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,209 +2,652 12 Jul – 18 Oct · 32 days played
15,55722,548peak 22,54812 Jul18 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,147 +0 22 Sept – 18 Oct · 2 observations
1,1471,147peak 1,14722 Sept18 Oct
23,315Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,147Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-07-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,147
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 54 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-22
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-22

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,339 below peak (22,548)
  • -44 over 30 days · steady
  • -390 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,791 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-22
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-22

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPillowFACEITLevel 5 · 1,147 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,209 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,147csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning50
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–53–3Last 10044%Win rateLLWLLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · −64ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

  • 3–17 · 15% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch5.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.0
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time529ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy19.4%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 18 Jul →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · ancient, 20 Jul →
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 16 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 12 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 12cacheWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2711–1641%-0.02
ancientA1811–761%-0.01
infernoD184–1422%-0.03
anubisB137–654%-0.01
nukeS128–467%-0.01
cacheD71–614%0.02
dust2C52–340%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

751Matches
50%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
74.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7850%0.9013.2
Anubis3653%0.9014.3
Ancient3241%0.9815.4
Nuke2871%0.9714.1
Vertigo2748%0.8914.1
Inferno2450%1.0214.9
Dust21030%1.0312.9
Cache956%1.0014.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
80.6%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
537msReaction time
39.6%T opening success
42.8%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
11.87HE damage / grenade
8.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.5625% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient2–13-0.089%24 Sept →
inferno10–130.0027%16 Sept →
ancient13–100.0132%16 Sept →
cache13–160.0011%16 Sept →
nuke11–130.0115%16 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0126%15 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0218%12 Sept →
ancient6–130.0117%12 Sept →
ancient6–130.0313%12 Sept →
inferno0–5-0.220%7 Sept →
cache11–130.1020%5 Sept →
cache11–130.0520%5 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0115%4 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.1025%3 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0322%2 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0020%28 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0117%25 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.1014%22 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0621%17 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0426%17 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0222%16 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0424%16 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0223%16 Aug →
mirage0–13-0.0423%15 Aug →
mirage3–130.0121%15 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0330%13 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0226%12 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0517%12 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0821%12 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.065%11 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0620%11 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.1218%11 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0723%11 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0914%11 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.0322%11 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0715%11 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0633%11 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0417%10 Aug →
ancient13–110.0327%10 Aug →
mirage16–140.0122%10 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0414%10 Aug →
mirage10–130.059%10 Aug →
inferno13–90.0518%10 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.059%10 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0318%2 Aug →
ancient13–80.0116%2 Aug →
mirage13–100.0122%2 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0811%2 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0122%30 Jul →
mirage8–130.0112%30 Jul →
anubis13–70.0422%30 Jul →
cache11–130.0522%28 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0426%28 Jul →
nuke13–40.0914%27 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0415%27 Jul →
anubis13–20.0124%27 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0513%26 Jul →
mirage13–60.0519%26 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0020%26 Jul →
anubis6–13-0.096%26 Jul →
mirage7–13-0.0710%26 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.0214%26 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0316%24 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.0113%24 Jul →
dust28–130.0217%24 Jul →
inferno1–13-0.0419%24 Jul →
mirage6–13-0.0511%24 Jul →
mirage15–15-0.0122%23 Jul →
mirage7–130.0113%23 Jul →
mirage13–90.0015%23 Jul →
anubis16–14-0.0619%23 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0422%22 Jul →
ancient10–5-0.0912%22 Jul →
cache15–150.0215%22 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0122%22 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.0118%21 Jul →
nuke13–100.0213%21 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0028%21 Jul →
ancient13–11-0.0318%21 Jul →
nuke13–30.0326%20 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0120%20 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0338%20 Jul →
nuke9–130.0223%20 Jul →
mirage13–5-0.0118%20 Jul →
mirage13–7-0.0820%19 Jul →
nuke13–4-0.0219%19 Jul →
ancient16–13-0.0320%19 Jul →
ancient13–20.0410%19 Jul →
inferno9–130.0513%18 Jul →
anubis13–60.1315%18 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.019%18 Jul →
nuke13–60.0117%16 Jul →
ancient3–130.0030%15 Jul →
mirage13–30.1020%15 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0519%15 Jul →
ancient13–40.0923%14 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0627%14 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.069%14 Jul →
ancient13–60.0320%13 Jul →
anubis13–10.0920%12 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.