Antero

Antero — CS2 Stats

FI76561198841502224[U:1:881236496]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

250Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
567Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating4,183Grey band · top ~82.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 16 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,183 -3,843 16 Apr17 Sept · 25 days played
3,7488,389peak 8,38916 Apr17 Sept
8,389Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-04-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,206 below peak (8,389)
  • -934 over 90 days
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 817 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,169), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate38.4%41.9%42.7%4.3% short
Shot accuracy15.9%12.2%11.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.810.980.990.19 short
Match win rate35.8%43.3%43.9%8.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAnteroFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER4,183 · Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning46
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41545Last 10041%Win rateLLLWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · −37ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 618ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility3.6
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch0.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning4.6
Utility3.6
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact1.7

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time629ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 676ms → last ⅓ avg 629ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–7 · inferno, 30 Jun
40%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · inferno, 19 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 4–9 · inferno, 19 Aug
13–0Biggest win · cache, 2 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8ancientWeakest map · 20% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientD2041620%-0.03
mirageB1991047%-0.03
nukeC1761135%-0.02
anubisC104640%-0.02
cacheA85363%-0.03
infernoD82625%-0.03
dust2B84450%-0.01
vertigo21150%0.00
warden21150%-0.01
overpass220100%0.00
italy110100%-0.04
stronghold1010%-0.06
alpine110100%0.01
office110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,616Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
1,786Matches
35.8%Match win rate
38.4%Headshot %
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
3,089MVPs
567Hours (in match)
1,869Bombs planted
240Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,264inferno
1,561dust2
1,332nuke
1,128train
611vertigo
448cbble
56ar_shoots
53office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

20Matches
40%Win rate
0.64Avg K/D
53.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke743%0.8110.1
Mirage450%0.507.0
Ancient250%0.5610.5
Inferno20%0.569.0
Overpass1100%1.0021.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
29.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.7%Spray accuracy
71.2%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
643msReaction time
35.0%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
10.41HE damage / grenade
2.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.7968 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.0372% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–13-0.0622%17 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0714%17 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0215%16 Sept
nuke13–10.0519%16 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0813%8 Sept
anubis13–3-0.0421%8 Sept
ancient13–5-0.0313%7 Sept
inferno14–16-0.0516%7 Sept
ancient12–16-0.0024%1 Sept
anubis13–60.0515%31 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0417%31 Aug
mirage13–100.0310%19 Aug
dust210–13-0.0521%19 Aug
ancient8–13-0.075%19 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1640%19 Aug
mirage3–10-0.107%19 Aug
dust213–7-0.0433%19 Aug
anubis14–160.0021%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0415%18 Aug
anubis13–50.067%18 Aug
anubis5–130.0314%17 Aug
nuke13–50.0827%17 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0220%17 Aug
dust216–140.0213%15 Aug
cache10–13-0.0621%14 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0913%14 Aug
nuke13–2-0.025%16 Jul
dust211–13-0.0121%16 Jul
mirage11–130.0325%16 Jul
nuke13–50.0111%16 Jul
ancient6–130.0125%16 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0015%30 Jun
inferno9–70.1320%30 Jun
nuke13–3-0.0322%17 Jun
mirage11–130.0129%11 Jun
vertigo13–8-0.0413%11 Jun
mirage13–80.0115%11 Jun
dust210–13-0.057%11 Jun
ancient3–130.0113%10 Jun
inferno1–130.0115%10 Jun
nuke7–13-0.038%10 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0419%7 Jun
ancient13–30.098%4 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0013%4 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0114%4 Jun
dust216–130.0019%4 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0114%3 Jun
ancient13–70.0212%3 Jun
dust215–150.0215%2 Jun
nuke8–130.0222%2 Jun
ancient0–6-0.0914%2 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0814%28 May
ancient11–130.0220%28 May
inferno8–8-0.028%28 May
mirage5–13-0.0515%28 May
dust213–60.0126%24 May
nuke6–13-0.0911%18 May
ancient7–13-0.0220%18 May
cache13–1-0.0320%18 May
nuke4–13-0.1117%7 May
anubis9–13-0.0529%6 May
mirage16–13-0.0418%6 May
nuke9–13-0.0128%6 May
anubis8–13-0.0317%4 May
nuke11–13-0.0412%4 May
mirage13–110.0220%4 May
inferno13–30.0220%4 May
mirage13–10-0.0813%3 May
ancient10–13-0.0911%3 May
warden13–70.0138%3 May
nuke3–13-0.0116%3 May
ancient5–13-0.0311%3 May
cache13–10-0.033%3 May
warden9–13-0.0315%3 May
vertigo12–120.0427%3 May
italy13–9-0.0411%2 May
stronghold12–12-0.0612%2 May
alpine13–30.0130%2 May
office13–40.0317%2 May
cache12–120.0113%2 May
cache13–0-0.0114%2 May
cache13–9-0.0416%29 Apr
cache13–7-0.0117%29 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0716%27 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0319%27 Apr
nuke9–13-0.039%22 Apr
mirage7–130.0133%22 Apr
overpass13–30.019%22 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0514%22 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0219%21 Apr
inferno2–13-0.119%21 Apr
mirage8–13-0.1119%21 Apr
anubis1–13-0.0417%21 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0416%21 Apr
mirage16–14-0.0413%19 Apr
overpass13–2-0.0119%19 Apr
mirage10–130.0111%18 Apr
ancient11–13-0.1114%18 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0314%16 Apr
nuke6–9-0.0014%16 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →