Lord Tøffluz — CS2 Stats

76561198840170454[U:1:879904726]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,914Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player

Premier CS Rating19,702Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#89404 of 257802 tracked

FaceitLevel 6 · 1,449 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,702 -2,223 6 Aug – 26 Oct · 23 days played

22,633Peak Premier in tracked matches

1,449Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

30Days played since 2026-08-06

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,449
Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 82 to go
Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
Level 7 first seen 2026-09-13
Level 6 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

2,695 below peak (22,397)
+822 over 30 days · improving
-2,223 over 90 days
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 298 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-09-13
Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58

Positioning67

Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–55–2Last 10043%Win rateWWWLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

4–1 · 80% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 10%
Avg reaction 650ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 631ms

Last 20

10–10 · 50% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.8

Utility6.5

Positioning6.7

Opening Duels3.1

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8

Positioning6.7

Utility6.5

Mechanics6.8

Opening Duels4.7

Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time628ms−3ms

first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 628ms

Headshot accuracy12.2%−1.6%

first ⅓ avg 13.8% → last ⅓ avg 12.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 7 Oct →

36%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · ancient, 24 Aug →

469msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · inferno, 14 Oct →

13–1Biggest win · anubis, 21 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak

W3Current streak

6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6mirageWeakest map · 13% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	24	9–15	38%	-0.00
ancient	A	20	11–9	55%	0.00
anubis	A	16	9–7	56%	-0.01
cache	C	15	6–9	40%	-0.01
inferno	D	9	2–7	22%	-0.02
mirage	D	8	1–7	13%	0.01
nuke	S	6	5–1	83%	-0.03
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.19
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

881Matches

50%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

78.5ADR

33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	101	47%	1.04	15.4
Anubis	96	58%	1.14	16.0
Dust2	52	50%	1.19	16.8
Vertigo	49	39%	1.23	13.4
Mirage	36	39%	0.83	12.9
Nuke	31	55%	1.13	16.6
Overpass	23	52%	1.20	16.6
Inferno	20	50%	0.92	14.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.5%Headshot accuracy

37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.4%Spray accuracy

80.7%Counter-strafing

11.2°Preaim

625msReaction time

51.4%T opening success

46.0%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

8.4%Flash assists

9.88HE damage / grenade

10.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.524% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–8	0.02	13%	26 Oct →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	4%	26 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.03	15%	26 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	10%	21 Oct →
anubis	13–1	0.04	9%	21 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	17%	21 Oct →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	13%	21 Oct →
dust2	9–13	0.04	16%	21 Oct →
anubis	10–13	0.04	18%	20 Oct →
ancient	13–9	0.00	11%	20 Oct →
cache	9–13	0.01	12%	17 Oct →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	13%	17 Oct →
dust2	13–8	0.07	5%	17 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	31%	14 Oct →
cache	13–6	0.02	13%	14 Oct →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	11%	14 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	14%	14 Oct →
ancient	4–13	0.08	12%	14 Oct →
ancient	16–13	0.02	13%	13 Oct →
cache	13–7	-0.00	10%	13 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.00	8%	13 Oct →
nuke	13–6	-0.04	7%	13 Oct →
anubis	16–12	0.00	10%	12 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	11%	12 Oct →
cache	10–13	-0.03	11%	12 Oct →
mirage	10–13	0.08	9%	7 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	14%	7 Oct →
dust2	13–6	0.08	13%	7 Oct →
anubis	10–13	0.02	9%	7 Oct →
ancient	13–6	0.10	19%	7 Oct →
anubis	13–6	-0.00	13%	30 Sept →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	7%	30 Sept →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	11%	30 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.04	14%	30 Sept →
dust2	13–9	0.03	9%	30 Sept →
cache	10–13	-0.05	9%	29 Sept →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	17%	29 Sept →
cache	13–11	-0.02	5%	29 Sept →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	20%	29 Sept →
anubis	13–7	-0.04	11%	28 Sept →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	13%	28 Sept →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	10%	25 Sept →
nuke	13–5	-0.02	15%	25 Sept →
cache	7–13	-0.01	12%	25 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.09	9%	24 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.04	22%	24 Sept →
inferno	13–2	-0.01	21%	23 Sept →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	19%	23 Sept →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	14%	23 Sept →
cache	9–13	-0.05	18%	23 Sept →
mirage	5–13	0.06	14%	23 Sept →
cache	6–13	-0.03	21%	22 Sept →
inferno	6–13	0.00	14%	22 Sept →
nuke	13–8	-0.07	6%	9 Sept →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	24%	9 Sept →
anubis	16–13	-0.01	9%	9 Sept →
nuke	13–2	0.02	10%	8 Sept →
dust2	11–13	0.03	18%	8 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	11%	8 Sept →
cache	7–13	-0.03	16%	8 Sept →
mirage	15–15	-0.09	13%	2 Sept →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	13%	2 Sept →
ancient	13–5	0.01	19%	1 Sept →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	10%	1 Sept →
ancient	13–7	0.02	8%	1 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	10%	1 Sept →
poseidon	2–9	-0.19	33%	26 Aug →
overpass	4–9	-0.12	5%	26 Aug →
inferno	6–9	0.08	14%	26 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	19%	26 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.03	10%	26 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	13%	26 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.00	10%	26 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.08	19%	25 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.00	23%	25 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	15%	24 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	36%	24 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.02	10%	24 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	21%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.01	16%	21 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.07	15%	21 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	4%	19 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.05	7%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.04	15%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	11%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.06	7%	18 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	13%	18 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	12%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	11%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.01	18%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.07	16%	11 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	9%	11 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.05	8%	11 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.01	7%	10 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	10%	10 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	17%	10 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.07	24%	9 Aug →
dust2	5–5	-0.07	10%	9 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.01	24%	9 Aug →
nuke	16–13	-0.03	9%	6 Aug →