GirlnBlue

GirlnBlue — CS2 Stats

US76561198834475101[U:1:874209373]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,974Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,669Top 5% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8469 of 260012 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,755 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+180Premier CS Rating · 26,489 → 26,669

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,669 -646 28 Aug – 5 Nov · 24 days played
25,24127,315peak 27,31528 Aug5 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,755 +0 28 Aug – 31 Oct · 8 observations
1,7551,755peak 1,75528 Aug31 Oct
27,315Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,755Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,755
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 246 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 646 below peak (27,315)
  • +664 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,331 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGirlnBlueFACEITLevel 10 · 1,755 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,669 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,755csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning68
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–40–7Last 10053%Win rateLWWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · +50ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility5.7
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning6.8
Utility5.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels7.7
Win Impact8.6

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time543ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 526ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy23.5%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 8 Oct →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 23 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · inferno, 19 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2111–1052%0.03
dust2C198–1142%0.01
nukeA149–564%0.06
ancientC125–742%0.02
infernoA117–464%0.03
anubisC104–640%0.04
cacheS75–271%0.00
shelter—43–175%0.05
overpass—10–10%0.03
office—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,381Matches
47%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
80.2ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage46151%1.1916.5
Dust220145%1.1016.1
Anubis14741%1.0314.5
Ancient14048%1.0215.5
Inferno11738%0.9914.9
Nuke11052%1.2317.7
Vertigo5452%1.1117.4
Overpass3650%1.1417.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.3%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
534msReaction time
61.7%T opening success
60.0%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
10.8%Flash assists
8.41HE damage / grenade
9.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–130.0120%5 Nov →
dust213–110.0140%5 Nov →
nuke13–80.1327%5 Nov →
dust24–13-0.0433%5 Nov →
nuke13–100.0123%4 Nov →
ancient13–30.0631%4 Nov →
nuke13–100.0514%4 Nov →
dust213–90.1122%4 Nov →
mirage7–130.0014%4 Nov →
mirage13–70.0215%3 Nov →
mirage13–90.0430%3 Nov →
nuke15–150.0224%3 Nov →
dust26–13-0.0521%2 Nov →
dust213–30.0617%2 Nov →
anubis5–130.0223%30 Oct →
ancient15–150.0325%28 Oct →
inferno13–30.0225%28 Oct →
ancient2–130.0727%28 Oct →
mirage13–110.0826%27 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0618%27 Oct →
mirage13–100.0427%27 Oct →
anubis6–130.0516%27 Oct →
ancient13–110.0029%26 Oct →
ancient10–130.0027%26 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0416%26 Oct →
anubis13–100.0321%26 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0517%26 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0028%25 Oct →
mirage16–12-0.0118%25 Oct →
ancient13–70.0719%24 Oct →
mirage9–10.0132%23 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0037%23 Oct →
dust211–130.0114%22 Oct →
mirage13–110.0219%22 Oct →
mirage13–80.0522%22 Oct →
inferno12–120.0523%22 Oct →
dust25–130.0525%22 Oct →
cache13–80.0726%21 Oct →
mirage11–130.0116%21 Oct →
mirage13–110.0828%21 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0218%21 Oct →
dust25–130.0129%20 Oct →
inferno13–90.1129%19 Oct →
mirage8–130.0121%18 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0219%17 Oct →
dust29–130.0041%15 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0313%8 Oct →
nuke13–50.1924%8 Oct →
nuke13–30.1935%8 Oct →
nuke13–10.0530%8 Oct →
shelter6–130.0526%8 Oct →
nuke12–120.0523%5 Oct →
shelter13–11-0.0121%5 Oct →
shelter13–70.1522%5 Oct →
shelter13–90.0031%5 Oct →
mirage11–130.0619%5 Oct →
ancient0–10-0.030%4 Oct →
overpass3–130.0316%4 Oct →
anubis5–130.0128%4 Oct →
office13–90.0520%4 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0127%2 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0324%2 Oct →
mirage6–130.0220%2 Oct →
dust213–80.0631%1 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0222%30 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0529%30 Sept →
inferno1–6-0.0331%29 Sept →
inferno13–100.0321%29 Sept →
inferno13–10.0914%29 Sept →
cache13–6-0.049%28 Sept →
ancient12–12-0.0122%28 Sept →
mirage10–130.0332%28 Sept →
nuke11–130.0414%28 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0322%27 Sept →
mirage13–20.037%27 Sept →
ancient13–100.0125%27 Sept →
inferno19–160.0220%27 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0120%27 Sept →
dust213–80.0125%25 Sept →
inferno12–120.0438%24 Sept →
nuke13–90.1127%24 Sept →
mirage10–130.0321%24 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0126%23 Sept →
mirage13–80.0426%23 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0523%23 Sept →
nuke9–130.0217%23 Sept →
nuke13–80.0156%23 Sept →
dust28–130.0626%23 Sept →
ancient13–70.1333%23 Sept →
inferno16–130.0724%23 Sept →
dust210–130.009%23 Sept →
anubis11–130.0624%21 Sept →
nuke13–40.0315%21 Sept →
dust213–110.0827%21 Sept →
anubis13–30.1529%21 Sept →
anubis13–20.1532%21 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0323%20 Sept →
mirage9–130.0513%20 Sept →
cache10–00.000%20 Sept →
cache15–150.0215%20 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.