jamwithjan — CS2 Stats

NO76561198834082218[U:1:873816490]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,849Tracked matches62%Win rate2022Tracked since

1,730Hours in CS

CSDB Rating6.1 Solid

Premier CS Rating20,892Pink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#5533 of 13827 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,925 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	38.0%	52.8%
Shot accuracy	0.0%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	0.99	1.08
Match win rate	40.2%	49.2%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58

Positioning64

Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateWLLLWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8

Aggression7.5

Utility7.0

Positioning6.4

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8

Positioning6.4

Utility7.0

Mechanics4.5

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time580ms−37ms

first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms

Headshot accuracy14.9%−0.6%

first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — ancient 13–4

13–2Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 32% over 25

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
anubis	D	25	8–17	32%	-0.00
cache	C	14	6–8	43%	0.03
ancient	S	13	9–4	69%	0.03
nuke	C	13	5–8	38%	0.03
inferno	A	12	7–5	58%	0.00
dust2	S	12	8–4	67%	0.03
mirage	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.00
debris	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07
sanctum	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,909Lifetime kills

0.99K/D

3,915Matches

40.2%Match win rate

38.0%Headshot %

0.0%Shot accuracy

7,610MVPs

1,730Hours (in match)

3,973Bombs planted

865Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,707

M4A4 / M4A1-S11,537

AWP5,789

Desert Eagle4,742

P2000 / USP-S3,408

MAC-103,117

MP92,789

Glock-182,133

XM10141,578

Galil AR1,397

Lifetime map wins

4,964dust2

4,855inferno

4,558nuke

2,250vertigo

433train

147ar_shoots

100office

67ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

895Matches

52%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

82.9ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	176	54%	1.20	17.3
Anubis	171	51%	1.08	16.8
Inferno	136	58%	1.09	16.0
Dust2	130	47%	1.00	15.1
Nuke	114	54%	1.15	17.3
Mirage	92	38%	0.91	14.8
Overpass	36	56%	0.95	14.7
Cache	26	58%	1.03	17.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy

35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.8%Spray accuracy

70.4%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

578msReaction time

30.8%T opening success

52.5%CT opening success

0.61Enemies flashed / flash

11.6%Flash assists

8.66HE damage / grenade

16.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.5837% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.8104% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–7	0.04	18%	25 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	16%	25 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.05	21%	25 Aug →
anubis	3–13	0.02	20%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	10%	24 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.01	16%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.04	7%	14 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	13%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	12%	14 Aug →
nuke	4–13	0.02	15%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.11	18%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.12	12%	12 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.02	9%	8 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	17%	8 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.05	16%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.04	16%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.05	11%	7 Aug →
debris	9–7	0.05	20%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	10%	7 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	27%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	14%	1 Aug →
debris	8–8	0.02	25%	1 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.00	19%	1 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.10	16%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.04	17%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.03	8%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.01	18%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.01	12%	30 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.03	9%	29 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.01	12%	29 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	13%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.02	13%	26 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	12%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.03	15%	25 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	21%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	21%	24 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.06	15%	22 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	6%	22 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	16%	22 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	27%	22 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.07	14%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.13	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	15%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	13%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.04	20%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.03	16%	19 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.00	18%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	17%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	29%	19 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.07	20%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.06	31%	18 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	15%	18 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.03	13%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.03	26%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.20	16%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.06	19%	17 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.06	17%	17 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	14%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.04	16%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.06	13%	16 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	12%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.08	19%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.04	11%	16 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	14%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.04	7%	16 Jul →
eldorado	6–9	0.03	10%	16 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.07	3%	16 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.04	10%	16 Jul →
cache	16–12	-0.02	4%	16 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.02	12%	16 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.02	18%	16 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.11	15%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.01	16%	15 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.09	30%	14 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	18%	14 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.07	3%	14 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.08	14%	13 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	11%	13 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	15%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	8%	13 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.02	21%	12 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	13%	12 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	16%	12 Jul →
anubis	6–13	0.00	10%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.11	17%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	19%	12 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	19%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	14%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.09	23%	12 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.02	11%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.01	10%	11 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.06	8%	11 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.02	17%	10 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	17%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	17%	29 Jun →
poseidon	7–9	-0.07	21%	16 Jun →
sanctum	5–9	-0.06	17%	16 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.05	28%	14 Jun →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	33%	13 Jun →
overpass	13–7	-0.06	7%	13 Jun →