DesignatedBottomFrag

DesignatedBottomFrag — CS2 Stats

US76561198831790856[U:1:871525128]Steam profile ↗

488Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 Developing
Premier CS Rating21,568Pink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7299 of 21414 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 987 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,568Peak Premier on CSDB
987Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 987
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 64 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,568
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,432 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDesignatedBottomFragFACEITLevel 4 · 987 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER21,568 · Pink bandPEAK ELO987csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning35
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateWWLLWLLTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.5
Aggression2.4
Utility5.5
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning3.5
Utility5.5
Mechanics4.8
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact6.2

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time639ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 10–13
130Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
83In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 12dust2Weakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA29161355%-0.01
dust2D1651131%-0.03
nukeA127558%0.02
ancientS128467%-0.02
cacheB126650%0.01
anubisC83538%-0.02
infernoC83538%-0.00
overpass32167%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

185Matches
47%Win rate
0.77Avg K/D
63.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22952%0.9111.2
Mirage2446%0.8611.8
Inferno1250%0.8213.3
Cache1155%0.7312.3
Ancient1145%0.8511.4
Anubis1050%0.9411.1
Overpass956%0.8112.4
Nuke743%0.688.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
71.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
657msReaction time
16.7%T opening success
39.4%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
12.12HE damage / grenade
7.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.7326% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–10.0221%28 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0115%28 Aug
dust29–13-0.0224%28 Aug
dust29–13-0.0633%23 Aug
mirage13–20.0227%23 Aug
inferno6–130.0130%23 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0221%23 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0311%15 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0314%15 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0613%15 Aug
dust213–10-0.045%15 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0111%9 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0117%9 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0512%7 Aug
dust213–4-0.0619%7 Aug
nuke13–100.1121%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0113%2 Aug
mirage13–100.0121%2 Aug
dust24–13-0.0710%2 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0514%2 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0417%2 Aug
dust213–90.0317%31 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0524%31 Jul
dust215–150.0020%30 Jul
nuke6–130.0127%21 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0820%17 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0215%17 Jul
cache13–00.0833%17 Jul
mirage10–130.1510%17 Jul
nuke13–100.0026%13 Jul
mirage13–60.0319%13 Jul
inferno13–6-0.009%13 Jul
dust20–4-0.090%12 Jul
dust29–13-0.0917%12 Jul
mirage13–70.0332%12 Jul
mirage9–13-0.049%10 Jul
mirage13–20.0522%10 Jul
cache10–130.0421%10 Jul
dust211–130.0115%10 Jul
mirage2–9-0.0525%9 Jul
cache15–150.0010%9 Jul
ancient13–90.028%9 Jul
anubis13–6-0.070%9 Jul
nuke16–130.0316%8 Jul
overpass13–60.0120%8 Jul
mirage13–40.0316%7 Jul
inferno8–130.0214%4 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0222%1 Jul
mirage9–130.0214%1 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0616%29 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0411%28 Jun
mirage13–110.0120%26 Jun
dust213–10-0.0315%25 Jun
inferno11–13-0.039%23 Jun
ancient13–70.0014%22 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0512%22 Jun
inferno16–140.0023%22 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0311%20 Jun
dust21–13-0.0531%14 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0018%14 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0415%14 Jun
anubis10–13-0.1010%14 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0422%13 Jun
dust213–9-0.0122%13 Jun
nuke13–40.0414%13 Jun
anubis7–130.0215%13 Jun
anubis16–140.0011%13 Jun
anubis3–130.0124%12 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0311%11 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0513%11 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0218%11 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0018%10 Jun
ancient6–130.0021%9 Jun
cache13–80.0023%8 Jun
mirage13–9-0.019%8 Jun
overpass12–16-0.1013%2 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0021%29 May
cache15–19-0.037%28 May
inferno3–13-0.068%26 May
mirage6–13-0.0723%26 May
nuke13–70.0326%26 May
overpass13–10-0.0019%25 May
anubis6–130.029%23 May
nuke13–100.1020%23 May
ancient13–6-0.0313%22 May
mirage13–3-0.0324%6 May
dust27–130.0513%4 May
cache9–13-0.085%4 May
dust211–130.0116%1 May
cache9–13-0.0121%1 May
cache13–3-0.015%1 May
cache13–20.1415%30 Apr
cache13–11-0.0417%29 Apr
cache3–60.0117%29 Apr
cache13–7-0.0110%28 Apr
ancient12–12-0.0418%27 Apr
inferno13–110.0915%24 Apr
ancient13–90.0814%18 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0510%17 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0711%17 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →