t0mbers

t0mbers — CS2 Stats

76561198821330450[U:1:861064722]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

749Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,926Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#87035 of 259985 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,102 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,926 +3,198 16 Aug – 26 Oct · 15 days played
14,90521,022peak 21,02216 Aug26 Oct
21,022Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,102Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
18Days played since 2026-08-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,102
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 99 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,096 below peak (21,022)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 74 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGt0mbersFACEITLevel 5 · 1,102 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,926 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,102csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning60
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–41–1Last 10058%Win rateWLWWWWWLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.09
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 449ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 489ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility4.9
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.0
Utility4.9
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.08+0.06
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.08
Reaction time502ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 509ms → last ⅓ avg 502ms
Headshot accuracy27.3%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 27.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 25 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 10–2 · nuke, 4 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · mirage, 23 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 30 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
4–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 89% over 9anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2921–872%0.05
nukeB199–1047%0.03
infernoB179–853%0.03
ancientB157–847%0.04
dust2S98–189%0.09
anubisC52–340%0.05
cache—30–30%0.02
office—10–10%0.11
train—11–0100%0.12
vertigo—11–0100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

165Matches
55%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
78.3ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6354%1.1113.9
Anubis1867%1.2616.6
Vertigo1369%1.0914.9
Nuke1346%0.9414.7
Inferno1050%1.1914.8
Ancient560%0.8612.2
Overpass5100%1.5013.6
Dust2450%1.9014.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
502msReaction time
38.1%T opening success
59.3%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
8.86HE damage / grenade
5.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.0866% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0215%26 Oct →
anubis1–130.0528%26 Oct →
ancient13–60.1514%26 Oct →
ancient13–60.1210%25 Oct →
nuke13–100.1026%25 Oct →
dust213–80.1029%25 Oct →
dust213–40.2841%25 Oct →
nuke5–130.0024%19 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0420%16 Oct →
nuke7–130.0040%16 Oct →
cache7–130.0223%11 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0315%11 Oct →
office4–130.1144%26 Sept →
nuke13–70.0227%4 Sept →
nuke10–2-0.0150%4 Sept →
inferno6–130.0420%4 Sept →
inferno8–130.1126%3 Sept →
inferno13–110.0817%3 Sept →
mirage13–10.1019%2 Sept →
mirage6–00.1635%2 Sept →
mirage13–20.0534%2 Sept →
ancient13–90.0423%2 Sept →
inferno13–100.0823%2 Sept →
nuke9–130.1630%2 Sept →
nuke13–40.1027%2 Sept →
cache6–130.0219%2 Sept →
mirage13–20.0331%30 Aug →
anubis13–100.1437%30 Aug →
mirage13–00.1220%30 Aug →
inferno13–60.1031%30 Aug →
nuke13–10.1432%30 Aug →
train13–20.1238%30 Aug →
inferno16–140.1033%27 Aug →
anubis13–30.1426%27 Aug →
mirage13–80.1120%27 Aug →
mirage16–130.1222%27 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0312%27 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0224%27 Aug →
nuke13–50.0737%27 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0313%27 Aug →
inferno11–130.0221%27 Aug →
mirage11–130.0015%25 Aug →
mirage13–70.1327%25 Aug →
dust213–80.1135%25 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0223%25 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0121%25 Aug →
mirage13–100.0727%25 Aug →
dust213–30.0826%25 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0437%25 Aug →
nuke13–100.0421%25 Aug →
mirage13–70.0919%25 Aug →
mirage16–130.0414%25 Aug →
inferno13–80.0724%25 Aug →
mirage13–70.0824%24 Aug →
dust213–80.0921%24 Aug →
nuke10–130.0122%24 Aug →
anubis13–160.0015%24 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0023%24 Aug →
inferno13–50.0838%24 Aug →
ancient8–130.0325%24 Aug →
ancient6–130.0627%24 Aug →
ancient13–80.0220%24 Aug →
nuke13–40.0322%24 Aug →
inferno10–130.0024%24 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0430%23 Aug →
nuke8–130.0814%23 Aug →
inferno13–100.0120%23 Aug →
ancient13–00.1426%23 Aug →
mirage13–30.0720%23 Aug →
cache11–130.0319%23 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0128%23 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0738%23 Aug →
mirage16–140.0819%19 Aug →
vertigo13–70.0920%19 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.1323%19 Aug →
dust213–50.1720%19 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0322%19 Aug →
mirage13–110.0520%19 Aug →
inferno9–130.0524%19 Aug →
nuke8–130.0512%19 Aug →
mirage13–80.0624%19 Aug →
mirage16–130.0917%19 Aug →
inferno13–30.0725%19 Aug →
mirage10–130.0415%19 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0124%19 Aug →
anubis0–9-0.1140%18 Aug →
ancient13–100.0125%18 Aug →
mirage13–90.0430%18 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0327%18 Aug →
ancient10–130.0426%18 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0336%18 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0516%18 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0128%18 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0224%17 Aug →
inferno13–100.0014%17 Aug →
mirage13–80.1234%17 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0923%16 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0522%16 Aug →
ancient13–90.0221%16 Aug →
mirage13–80.0632%16 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.