๐ฎ๐๐๐๐ โ CS2 Stats
76561198821037998[U:1:860772270]Steam profile โโ No bans
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (71 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak โ 1,310
- Next: Level 7 at 1,351 โ 41 to go
- Reached: Level 6 ยท Level 5 ยท Level 4 ยท Level 3
- Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
- Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29
Premier CS Rating
- At peak โ 26,232
- Next: Gold band at 30,000 โ 3,768 to go
- Reached: Red band ยท Pink band ยท Purple band ยท Blue band
- Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
- Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
Premier is CSDBโs own observation โ it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDBโs own observation โ no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere โ it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0โ100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player โ Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).
Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates โ how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use โ so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like donk 83% playstyle similarity
Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions โ it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison โ
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 92 โ the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game โ the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start โ warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers โ no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (ร1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 169 | 55% | 0.92 | 14.2 |
| Ancient | 110 | 55% | 0.91 | 14.1 |
| Dust2 | 88 | 58% | 0.98 | 15.0 |
| Anubis | 56 | 54% | 0.88 | 13.6 |
| Inferno | 47 | 45% | 0.81 | 13.8 |
| Vertigo | 17 | 47% | 0.99 | 15.9 |
| Nuke | 13 | 46% | 0.79 | 11.4 |
| Train | 2 | 50% | 0.68 | 13.5 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API โ a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches โ stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag โ the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups โ
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.2513 โ below the 4 mark we flag
Milestones
This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.