nzg — CS2 Stats

76561198818852528[U:1:858586800]✓ No bans

1,125Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,061Top 25% of 206,528 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20316 of 253583 tracked
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,061 +1,491 17 Jul – 18 Oct · 35 days played
23,16626,828peak 26,82817 Jul18 Oct
26,848Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,802Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-07-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,802
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 199 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,767 below peak (26,828)
  • +164 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,593 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,939 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-18
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-18

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnzgPREMIER25,061 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,802csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning45
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLLWLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −9.0pp headshot accuracy · +9ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 648ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 615ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility7.0
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch4.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.5
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time587ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy23.8%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 11 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · mirage, 30 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · dust2, 22 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 30 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

16Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 64% over 22infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2214–864%-0.00
ancientC188–1044%0.02
nukeB168–850%0.00
mirageA148–657%0.02
cacheB126–650%0.03
anubisB126–650%-0.01
infernoC52–340%-0.01
overpass—10–10%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

535Matches
50%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
87.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis13548%1.3618.6
Ancient10455%1.4619.3
Nuke9559%1.4819.4
Mirage6739%1.1517.6
Inferno3936%1.1816.9
Vertigo3773%1.3720.1
Dust22737%1.0815.9
Train650%1.0515.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
83.3%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
592msReaction time
34.4%T opening success
31.9%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
12.6%Flash assists
9.17HE damage / grenade
13.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.4069% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.0632%18 Oct →
mirage3–60.0214%17 Oct →
cache16–140.0623%17 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0313%17 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0118%17 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0522%16 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.058%16 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0324%15 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0020%13 Oct →
nuke13–1-0.0215%12 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0625%12 Oct →
mirage13–50.0534%12 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0330%12 Oct →
ancient13–50.1627%11 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0223%11 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.1025%10 Oct →
dust27–130.0021%10 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0239%10 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0424%10 Oct →
nuke13–70.0831%10 Oct →
mirage6–130.0332%10 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0229%2 Oct →
nuke13–160.0126%1 Oct →
mirage13–100.0226%1 Oct →
mirage13–00.0344%30 Sept →
anubis13–10.0215%30 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0421%30 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0222%28 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0211%27 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0124%27 Sept →
dust213–100.0327%27 Sept →
dust213–60.0817%27 Sept →
mirage13–00.1225%27 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0133%26 Sept →
anubis11–40.0122%26 Sept →
ancient16–130.0811%26 Sept →
dust213–40.0041%26 Sept →
dust213–70.0035%24 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0524%24 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0726%22 Sept →
overpass8–13-0.1021%22 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0421%22 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.1123%22 Sept →
dust23–60.028%19 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0713%19 Sept →
anubis13–30.0120%19 Sept →
nuke0–2-0.010%19 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.1218%11 Sept →
nuke7–130.0638%8 Sept →
dust213–60.0325%8 Sept →
nuke10–130.0132%7 Sept →
mirage13–100.0420%7 Sept →
inferno6–130.0534%7 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0810%1 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0324%29 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0033%29 Aug →
mirage13–60.0722%28 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0525%28 Aug →
nuke3–7-0.0423%28 Aug →
cache13–110.0221%26 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0323%25 Aug →
ancient16–140.0433%25 Aug →
anubis13–100.0340%25 Aug →
cache13–60.1527%24 Aug →
inferno14–160.0417%24 Aug →
mirage13–50.0725%23 Aug →
nuke11–130.0116%23 Aug →
anubis2–5-0.0329%22 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0419%22 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0323%22 Aug →
dust213–90.1132%8 Aug →
nuke13–30.1015%8 Aug →
ancient13–80.0115%8 Aug →
cache6–130.0231%8 Aug →
nuke13–50.0834%8 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0728%6 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0329%6 Aug →
cache13–50.0931%6 Aug →
ancient13–60.0825%6 Aug →
ancient4–40.0932%3 Aug →
cache13–110.0216%3 Aug →
anubis0–5-0.0325%2 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0018%1 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0335%31 Jul →
ancient13–70.1031%31 Jul →
ancient12–160.0223%29 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0225%29 Jul →
nuke13–40.0125%29 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0913%20 Jul →
cache13–50.1327%17 Jul →
dust213–70.0523%17 Jul →
anubis8–130.0122%17 Jul →
cache8–130.0326%15 Jul →
anubis13–40.1038%15 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.0432%15 Jul →
dust29–130.0623%14 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0321%14 Jul →
nuke13–40.0420%14 Jul →
cache9–130.0220%12 Jul →
ancient13–80.1036%12 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches16-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.