ange146

ange146 — CS2 Stats

76561198814426713[U:1:854160985]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,550Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,120Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#65683 of 251228 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (34 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,120 +78 10 Aug – 7 Sept · 10 days played
19,87721,231peak 21,23110 Aug7 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,290 +0 27 Aug – 30 Aug · 2 observations
1,2901,290peak 1,29027 Aug30 Aug
21,334Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,290Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-07-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 111 below peak (21,231)
  • +78 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,880 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGange146FACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,120 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,290csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning58
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–38–4Last 10058%Win rateWWLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +2.1pp headshot accuracy · −53ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 466ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 451ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 477ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility3.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning5.8
Utility3.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact9.4

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time512ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms
Headshot accuracy26.1%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 30.4% → last ⅓ avg 26.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 22 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · ancient, 10 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 16–14 · dust2, 2 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 27infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2718–967%0.02
mirageA2113–862%0.02
ancientA1710–759%0.01
anubisB126–650%0.03
cacheC125–742%0.01
infernoD72–529%-0.03
nuke—33–0100%0.01
vertigo—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,284Matches
51%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
86.8ADR
64%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage39452%1.2318.2
Dust226050%1.2218.1
Ancient16155%1.2017.7
Anubis10552%1.2618.1
Inferno7453%1.2018.6
Cache7341%1.2117.8
Nuke5347%1.1117.6
Vertigo1362%1.1915.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.3%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
82.5%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
518msReaction time
23.2%T opening success
50.9%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
9.78HE damage / grenade
2.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3787 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.183% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–1-0.0030%10 Oct →
dust213–40.0524%6 Oct →
inferno11–130.0431%4 Oct →
anubis8–130.0418%3 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0732%1 Oct →
ancient14–160.0130%9 Sept →
nuke13–100.0125%9 Sept →
dust25–130.0335%9 Sept →
anubis13–110.0625%9 Sept →
anubis13–110.0828%9 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0622%9 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.020%8 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0142%8 Sept →
ancient13–110.0424%7 Sept →
ancient13–60.0116%7 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0424%7 Sept →
ancient16–130.0429%7 Sept →
dust213–50.0336%7 Sept →
anubis11–130.0323%7 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0040%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.0122%4 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0028%4 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0727%2 Sept →
anubis5–130.0026%2 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0328%2 Sept →
dust213–70.1021%2 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0237%2 Sept →
ancient13–80.0227%2 Sept →
dust216–140.0320%2 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.1033%1 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0016%1 Sept →
dust213–70.0324%1 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0619%31 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0235%31 Aug →
dust216–120.0231%31 Aug →
dust213–60.1037%31 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0131%31 Aug →
dust213–70.0123%30 Aug →
mirage6–130.0236%29 Aug →
nuke22–180.0028%29 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0035%29 Aug →
dust213–60.0130%28 Aug →
inferno17–19-0.0435%28 Aug →
cache13–60.0628%28 Aug →
mirage13–70.1230%28 Aug →
cache13–80.0840%28 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0330%27 Aug →
mirage13–100.0234%27 Aug →
mirage13–3-0.0321%27 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0135%26 Aug →
mirage15–150.0129%26 Aug →
mirage13–4-0.0124%26 Aug →
dust213–80.1332%25 Aug →
mirage13–110.0637%25 Aug →
cache15–150.0420%25 Aug →
mirage13–40.0529%25 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0221%24 Aug →
mirage10–130.0421%24 Aug →
inferno12–160.0326%24 Aug →
mirage10–130.0224%24 Aug →
cache14–160.0830%23 Aug →
ancient10–130.0426%23 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0330%23 Aug →
dust213–100.0128%23 Aug →
dust216–13-0.0347%23 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0325%22 Aug →
ancient5–130.0222%22 Aug →
anubis13–90.1435%22 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0324%19 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0728%18 Aug →
ancient13–100.0333%18 Aug →
mirage13–80.0228%18 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0616%15 Aug →
nuke13–10.0148%15 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0116%15 Aug →
vertigo13–50.0142%14 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0220%13 Aug →
mirage13–70.0334%13 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0620%13 Aug →
dust213–100.0340%12 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0625%10 Aug →
dust215–150.0732%10 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0427%10 Aug →
dust29–130.0727%10 Aug →
ancient13–60.0550%10 Aug →
anubis13–70.0428%10 Aug →
ancient16–130.0439%10 Aug →
dust213–50.0631%1 Aug →
mirage15–150.0032%1 Aug →
cache2–13-0.0342%1 Aug →
anubis13–30.0113%31 Jul →
cache13–80.0525%31 Jul →
mirage13–10.1333%30 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0234%30 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0423%30 Jul →
mirage11–130.0726%29 Jul →
cache10–130.0040%29 Jul →
ancient13–60.0032%29 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0032%29 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0431%28 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.