lu1kkk

lu1kkk — CS2 Stats

76561198806990505[U:1:846724777]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,374Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,651Top 50% of 211,827 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,316 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,651 +84 23 Sept – 29 Oct · 20 days played
16,01519,196peak 19,19623 Sept29 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,316 +0 29 Aug – 23 Sept · 4 observations
1,3161,316peak 1,31629 Aug23 Sept
19,196Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,316Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
19Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,316
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 35 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 545 below peak (19,196)
  • +84 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,349 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlu1kkkFACEITLevel 4 · 1,316 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,651 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,316csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning46
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–53–2Last 10045%Win rateLWWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.2
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.6
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time637ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−7.4%
first ⅓ avg 26.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 9 Oct →
45%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · ancient, 22 Oct →
484msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 10 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 28 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 62% over 13nukeWeakest map · 17% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB1910–953%-0.01
dust2B178–947%0.00
cacheA159–660%-0.01
ancientA138–562%-0.02
anubisD134–931%-0.03
nukeD122–1017%-0.01
infernoC114–736%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

819Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
65.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6152%0.9313.2
Nuke4058%0.8212.3
Inferno3941%0.9213.0
Dust23656%0.9012.9
Anubis3152%0.9213.0
Ancient1932%0.7610.9
Overpass1070%0.8812.0
Vertigo850%1.0817.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
633msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
32.7%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.79HE damage / grenade
15.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.8268% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.0418%29 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0120%29 Oct →
ancient13–100.045%29 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0526%29 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0616%28 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0032%28 Oct →
cache13–10.0733%28 Oct →
ancient13–110.0117%28 Oct →
anubis4–130.0326%27 Oct →
nuke13–110.0411%27 Oct →
dust213–80.0127%27 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0124%27 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0317%27 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0727%26 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.033%26 Oct →
ancient13–40.0621%26 Oct →
mirage13–80.0324%26 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0714%26 Oct →
nuke9–130.0821%25 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0216%25 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0218%25 Oct →
dust210–130.0622%25 Oct →
mirage13–110.0117%25 Oct →
mirage13–110.0217%23 Oct →
anubis13–100.0115%23 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.019%23 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0624%23 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0512%22 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0325%22 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0910%22 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.1011%22 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0945%22 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0324%22 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0219%22 Oct →
ancient13–90.0524%21 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.1031%21 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0813%19 Oct →
inferno8–130.0219%19 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0619%18 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0227%18 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0033%18 Oct →
dust213–80.0516%18 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0314%17 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0120%17 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0415%17 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0517%17 Oct →
cache16–13-0.0129%17 Oct →
dust28–13-0.039%17 Oct →
mirage13–50.0318%17 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0413%17 Oct →
anubis10–00.010%17 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0616%17 Oct →
nuke13–160.0130%16 Oct →
nuke10–130.0425%16 Oct →
inferno3–130.0123%16 Oct →
mirage11–130.0021%16 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0112%16 Oct →
cache6–13-0.057%16 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0522%15 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.067%15 Oct →
nuke13–90.0714%15 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0614%15 Oct →
cache4–13-0.074%15 Oct →
ancient13–80.0118%14 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0533%14 Oct →
dust213–80.0915%14 Oct →
dust211–130.0319%14 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0735%14 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0721%14 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0929%14 Oct →
ancient13–90.0016%13 Oct →
cache13–80.0526%13 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0422%13 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0331%13 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0440%12 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0429%12 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0137%12 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0535%12 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0622%12 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0323%12 Oct →
cache13–70.0839%12 Oct →
mirage13–30.0938%12 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0131%12 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0422%11 Oct →
dust213–30.0617%11 Oct →
mirage13–60.0326%11 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0321%10 Oct →
mirage9–130.0035%10 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0028%10 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0613%10 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0322%10 Oct →
dust213–2-0.0545%10 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0314%10 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0612%10 Oct →
inferno8–130.0017%10 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0636%10 Oct →
cache13–70.0222%9 Oct →
dust213–50.1135%9 Oct →
mirage13–50.0222%9 Oct →
mirage10–130.0127%9 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.