aquars

aquars — CS2 Stats

HK76561198800147622[U:1:839881894]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,468Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,956 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (33 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,956 → 3,956
+22Tracked matches · now 2,468
+13.3ppWin rate · 46.7% → 60.0%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,956 +0 28 Aug – 25 Sept · 8 observations
3,9563,956peak 3,95628 Aug25 Sept
3,956Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-06-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,956
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 44 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaquarsFACEITLevel 10 · 3,956 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,956csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning62
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT64–36Last 10064%Win rateLLWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 466ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 437ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 464ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility5.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning6.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time484ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 513ms → last ⅓ avg 484ms
Headshot accuracy27.7%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 27.9% → last ⅓ avg 27.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 20 Jun →
46%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · cache, 22 Sept →
328msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · mirage, 21 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 21 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
L2Current streak
11–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2315–865%-0.00
mirageS2215–768%-0.00
nukeS1711–665%0.01
cacheA148–657%0.02
ancientS107–370%-0.01
anubisC94–544%-0.00
overpassS54–180%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,741Matches
55%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
88.3ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage82359%1.3218.5
Dust244759%1.3717.7
Ancient39353%1.2817.9
Anubis33055%1.3317.8
Nuke19553%1.3018.1
Train9466%1.3718.8
Vertigo6954%1.2818.0
Overpass6464%1.3618.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.6%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.2%Spray accuracy
87.7%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
474msReaction time
47.6%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
5.68HE damage / grenade
7.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4858 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.0433%23 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0939%23 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0217%23 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0119%23 Oct →
nuke13–80.0932%23 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0111%23 Oct →
dust213–40.0425%23 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0028%22 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0229%22 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0244%21 Oct →
nuke13–10.0228%21 Oct →
cache13–00.0628%21 Oct →
mirage13–40.0223%21 Oct →
cache11–130.0646%22 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0914%22 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0914%22 Sept →
cache11–130.0646%22 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0617%22 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.0931%22 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0617%22 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.0931%22 Sept →
dust216–140.0536%13 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0225%13 Sept →
ancient16–130.0129%13 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0519%13 Sept →
mirage13–110.0528%13 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0129%13 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0221%12 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0330%12 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0327%12 Sept →
cache13–100.0832%11 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0145%11 Sept →
mirage13–40.0723%10 Sept →
dust213–70.0735%10 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0418%9 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0724%9 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0225%9 Sept →
cache3–130.0633%3 Sept →
anubis13–160.0230%3 Sept →
dust213–110.0338%3 Sept →
mirage13–20.0334%2 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0232%1 Sept →
mirage8–130.0128%1 Sept →
dust213–60.0020%1 Sept →
ancient19–160.0329%1 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0335%1 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0622%31 Aug →
dust213–40.0239%31 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0541%30 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0122%30 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0222%30 Aug →
anubis6–13-0.0128%30 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0328%30 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0123%9 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0136%9 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0022%9 Aug →
ancient13–110.0230%8 Aug →
dust213–110.0627%8 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0517%7 Aug →
mirage13–80.0529%7 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0120%30 Jul →
cache13–60.0527%30 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0415%30 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0616%30 Jul →
mirage13–70.0721%30 Jul →
mirage13–70.0239%30 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0118%30 Jul →
nuke13–100.0321%30 Jul →
dust213–40.0025%29 Jul →
nuke13–70.0330%29 Jul →
nuke13–80.0421%29 Jul →
cache16–120.0230%27 Jul →
dust213–30.0627%27 Jul →
nuke13–16-0.0923%27 Jul →
dust213–10.0322%27 Jul →
nuke13–00.1041%27 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0430%11 Jul →
dust213–110.0232%10 Jul →
mirage13–100.0139%10 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0523%10 Jul →
nuke19–150.0434%9 Jul →
ancient13–110.0426%9 Jul →
mirage3–13-0.0218%9 Jul →
overpass13–80.1432%29 Jun →
nuke13–100.1232%26 Jun →
cache13–80.0238%26 Jun →
mirage14–16-0.0616%21 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0525%21 Jun →
ancient8–130.0328%20 Jun →
anubis13–30.2227%20 Jun →
overpass13–30.1445%20 Jun →
nuke13–40.0434%20 Jun →
dust29–130.0226%20 Jun →
mirage13–7-0.0237%20 Jun →
overpass13–100.0022%20 Jun →
nuke19–170.0227%19 Jun →
overpass10–13-0.0517%19 Jun →
mirage13–9-0.0520%19 Jun →
overpass13–50.0420%17 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0332%17 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches11-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.