mese

mese — CS2 Stats

76561198799790134[U:1:839524406]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

360Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,289Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40530 of 260013 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,968 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Oct 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,289 +5,635 16 Dec – 19 Oct · 9 days played
17,55224,253peak 24,25316 Dec19 Oct
24,253Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,968Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2024-04-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,968
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 33 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • 964 below peak (24,253)
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,711 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmeseFACEITLevel 9 · 1,968 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,289 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,968csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning62
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60–39–1Last 10060%Win rateLWWLWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.9pp headshot accuracy · −9ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.2
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning6.2
Utility4.2
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time581ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy23.3%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 4–9 · vertigo, 7 Jan →
83%Best headshot accuracy · 4–2 · nuke, 21 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · nuke, 13 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 25 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 86% over 7infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2916–1355%-0.01
nukeS2419–579%0.00
ancientB126–650%-0.01
dust2S76–186%-0.01
anubisC73–443%-0.02
infernoC52–340%0.02
cache—42–250%-0.01
overpass—42–250%-0.03
vertigo—42–250%0.06
train—32–167%0.03
office—10–10%-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

476Matches
55%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
75.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
9%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4055%1.2216.9
Nuke3272%1.0515.7
Ancient2846%0.9713.9
Anubis2148%0.9915.8
Dust2825%0.8015.4
Vertigo425%0.8617.0
Inferno250%0.579.5
Overpass10%0.6710.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
583msReaction time
58.0%T opening success
45.4%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
7.85HE damage / grenade
4.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0432%27 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0223%19 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0316%16 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0546%16 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0724%16 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0815%16 Oct →
anubis2–13-0.0425%16 Oct →
anubis13–40.0324%15 Oct →
cache16–120.0223%14 Oct →
mirage16–130.0226%14 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0515%13 Oct →
nuke13–50.0021%13 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0217%13 Oct →
office5–13-0.0722%13 Oct →
nuke17–190.0331%13 Oct →
ancient12–16-0.0219%8 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0327%7 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0230%7 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0618%5 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0424%5 Oct →
nuke8–10.0113%5 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0128%5 Oct →
dust213–110.0223%5 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.096%5 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0410%25 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0328%22 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0122%14 Sept →
mirage13–90.0233%14 Sept →
nuke11–130.0029%13 Sept →
mirage13–60.0329%18 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0129%18 Aug →
nuke13–80.0614%29 Jun →
nuke13–90.0425%19 Mar →
dust213–20.0932%19 Mar →
nuke13–2-0.0219%14 Mar →
dust213–100.0217%14 Mar →
mirage13–80.1324%8 Mar →
nuke13–50.0321%8 Mar →
ancient13–60.0127%8 Mar →
mirage10–130.0410%4 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0816%25 Feb →
inferno13–00.1119%25 Feb →
anubis13–20.0517%25 Feb →
mirage13–4-0.0326%25 Feb →
mirage11–130.0122%17 Feb →
overpass16–13-0.0114%17 Feb →
mirage13–3-0.0318%17 Feb →
dust213–100.0217%17 Feb →
inferno9–130.0413%16 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0610%16 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.1312%16 Feb →
inferno16–130.0216%15 Feb →
nuke13–60.0622%15 Feb →
anubis3–13-0.0628%15 Feb →
ancient16–140.0219%15 Feb →
nuke13–80.0219%24 Jan →
mirage13–70.0315%24 Jan →
ancient6–130.0024%13 Jan →
overpass5–13-0.0113%12 Jan →
nuke13–60.0113%12 Jan →
vertigo4–90.1730%7 Jan →
mirage9–13-0.0516%22 Dec →
ancient13–30.0423%21 Dec →
nuke13–70.0023%16 Dec →
train9–130.0125%16 Dec →
inferno11–13-0.0515%15 Dec →
train13–40.0827%15 Dec →
overpass5–13-0.0923%15 Dec →
mirage13–3-0.0114%13 Dec →
ancient5–130.0432%13 Dec →
inferno7–13-0.0326%13 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0424%12 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0714%12 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0518%9 Oct →
ancient13–60.0133%9 Oct →
train13–6-0.0120%9 Oct →
nuke13–60.0612%9 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0430%6 Oct →
overpass13–90.0221%6 Oct →
nuke10–1-0.0512%6 Oct →
nuke4–130.0243%6 Oct →
mirage13–70.0526%2 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0420%24 Aug →
nuke13–10-0.0215%24 Aug →
nuke13–80.0322%22 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.0220%22 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0225%22 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0218%21 Aug →
nuke4–20.1083%21 Aug →
nuke13–110.0111%21 Aug →
vertigo13–1-0.0611%21 Aug →
mirage13–60.0223%21 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0320%21 Aug →
mirage13–110.0019%21 Aug →
vertigo13–60.0214%21 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0614%20 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0425%19 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0735%9 Jun →
mirage13–20.0232%1 May →
vertigo11–130.1036%27 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.