最扁的山最短的河

最扁的山最短的河 — CS2 Stats

TW76561198796241354[U:1:835975626]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

94Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning66
Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY37436Last 8643%Win rateWWLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · −34ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 86 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility1.4
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels5.9

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.6
Utility1.4
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time574ms−79ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 574ms
Headshot accuracy13.0%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 13.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 86 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 7–0 · mirage, 15 May
30%Best headshot accuracy · 9–5 · mirage, 16 Oct
422msFastest reaction time · 1–5 · mirage, 13 Jul
16–2Biggest win · nuke, 24 Jul

Across the last 86 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 8cacheWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA38211755%0.01
infernoD1651131%-0.01
nukeD124833%0.01
dust2A85363%0.02
cacheD51420%-0.03
anubis41325%-0.01
office1010%-0.02
ancient1010%-0.00
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 86 tracked matches.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
40.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.0%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
580msReaction time
41.2%T opening success
64.0%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
1.12HE damage / grenade
1.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.4305% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4534 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0114%22 Sept
mirage13–30.0213%21 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0629%16 Sept
dust211–130.0010%16 Sept
dust213–11-0.017%14 Sept
mirage13–110.0610%11 Sept
mirage0–7-0.0410%11 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0314%11 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0510%10 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0116%8 Sept
anubis13–50.0813%8 Sept
dust213–11-0.0812%6 Sept
dust213–00.0515%1 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0111%24 Aug
dust213–10.1011%24 Aug
dust213–40.0521%23 Aug
mirage0–9-0.060%22 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0512%16 Aug
anubis6–13-0.083%12 Aug
cache15–15-0.0214%8 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0517%7 Aug
cache15–15-0.0214%6 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0213%5 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0114%30 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0111%25 Jul
dust28–130.0710%24 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0316%23 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0227%20 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0111%18 Jul
cache13–6-0.0522%18 Jul
nuke13–10-0.006%18 Jul
cache15–15-0.006%18 Jul
mirage13–60.0312%17 Jul
mirage13–60.0215%13 Jul
mirage13–60.0511%13 Jul
mirage1–5-0.038%13 Jul
office3–13-0.0210%10 Jul
mirage13–50.0612%9 Jul
mirage12–12-0.079%5 Jul
mirage13–100.0518%5 Jul
mirage6–130.029%5 Jul
nuke8–130.0213%4 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0318%5 Jun
inferno13–40.0816%2 Jun
mirage13–7-0.067%1 Jun
dust25–13-0.0410%1 Jun
mirage13–60.0313%1 Jun
inferno13–110.0413%31 May
ancient13–16-0.0010%31 May
mirage8–13-0.0010%31 May
mirage13–3-0.0117%15 May
cache11–13-0.0415%15 May
mirage7–00.3322%15 May
inferno5–9-0.0015%5 Apr
inferno9–60.079%5 Apr
mirage12–12-0.0112%31 Mar
inferno6–9-0.0117%27 Nov
inferno4–9-0.068%25 Nov
mirage6–13-0.0311%5 Nov
inferno2–13-0.0016%21 Dec
nuke5–13-0.014%11 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0213%10 Jul
inferno13–50.0617%8 Jul
nuke13–30.0213%7 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0612%4 Jul
mirage13–80.0029%6 Mar
inferno3–9-0.0621%20 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0118%8 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0318%10 Nov
mirage13–70.0217%28 Sept
nuke7–90.0413%18 Sept
mirage1–9-0.116%4 Sept
nuke9–30.1613%30 Aug
nuke5–9-0.027%30 Jul
nuke3–90.008%30 Jul
mirage9–70.0419%28 Jul
nuke6–10-0.0713%26 Mar
mirage9–20.087%19 Oct
mirage9–5-0.0130%16 Oct
mirage4–90.1111%15 Oct
inferno16–13-0.0328%4 Oct
nuke6–10-0.077%27 Aug
overpass13–16-0.028%25 Jul
nuke16–20.047%24 Jul
mirage1–16-0.0823%5 Jul
inferno9–160.007%20 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →