Evilna

Evilna — CS2 Stats

FI76561198740878221[U:1:780612493]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

462Tracked matches33%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating5,571Light Blue band · top ~76.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 5,571 → 5,571
+4Tracked matches · now 462
−6.7ppWin rate · 40.0% → 33.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 24 days played since 10 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 5,571 -2,041 12 Aug19 Sept · 21 days played
5,3419,869peak 9,86912 Aug19 Sept
9,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-07-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,298 below peak (9,869)
  • -2,871 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 4,429 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEvilnaFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER5,571 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning65
Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41581Last 10041%Win rateLWWLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility1.4
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning6.5
Utility1.4
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time577ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–3 · ancient, 24 Aug
35%Best headshot accuracy · 8–1 · dust2, 24 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 9–7 · inferno, 15 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 7 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
58In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 55% over 20dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD2891932%-0.02
anubisA2011955%-0.01
ancientB168850%0.02
nukeC167944%0.01
mirageC104640%-0.02
dust2D82625%-0.02
cache2020%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
33%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
68.3ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis650%0.9515.3
Inferno450%0.7312.8
Dust230%0.8018.3
Mirage20%0.488.0
Ancient10%0.213.0
Cache10%0.8113.0
Nuke1100%1.0912.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.5%Spray accuracy
65.1%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
586msReaction time
44.4%T opening success
51.9%CT opening success
0.14Enemies flashed / flash
1.1%Flash assists
7.55HE damage / grenade
0.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1416 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0418%19 Sept
anubis13–100.029%19 Sept
ancient13–110.0117%19 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0017%19 Sept
nuke13–40.0311%18 Sept
anubis13–90.1016%18 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0412%18 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0517%18 Sept
ancient16–130.0619%17 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0413%17 Sept
nuke6–13-0.0312%17 Sept
ancient9–130.1011%17 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0611%17 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0226%17 Sept
nuke6–130.0618%17 Sept
inferno9–7-0.0018%15 Sept
inferno3–9-0.1729%15 Sept
anubis13–10.087%15 Sept
mirage0–9-0.033%15 Sept
inferno5–130.0230%15 Sept
dust28–13-0.0113%15 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0429%14 Sept
dust211–13-0.0416%14 Sept
ancient10–130.0115%14 Sept
dust23–13-0.0421%13 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0322%13 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0211%13 Sept
anubis13–60.0611%13 Sept
nuke13–40.0611%13 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0419%12 Sept
inferno13–70.049%11 Sept
nuke11–130.0016%11 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0018%11 Sept
anubis13–80.0117%11 Sept
inferno13–90.0615%11 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0518%8 Sept
anubis8–13-0.039%8 Sept
nuke10–130.019%8 Sept
inferno13–10.1016%7 Sept
ancient7–130.0117%7 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0523%7 Sept
inferno13–00.0417%7 Sept
inferno7–13-0.039%6 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0819%6 Sept
anubis13–90.0112%6 Sept
nuke13–50.0617%6 Sept
anubis12–16-0.037%2 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0214%2 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0219%1 Sept
inferno8–8-0.1026%1 Sept
anubis13–3-0.0514%1 Sept
cache4–130.0511%1 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0422%28 Aug
dust220–22-0.0115%28 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0710%28 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0214%28 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0518%27 Aug
dust213–6-0.0210%27 Aug
inferno9–130.0115%27 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0611%27 Aug
mirage1–13-0.078%27 Aug
anubis13–7-0.019%27 Aug
ancient13–30.1215%24 Aug
mirage2–130.0018%24 Aug
dust28–10.0835%24 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0310%24 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0616%24 Aug
mirage16–130.074%21 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0012%21 Aug
ancient13–20.0220%21 Aug
nuke13–30.0421%15 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0017%15 Aug
inferno12–160.0114%15 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0315%14 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0515%14 Aug
ancient13–30.1119%14 Aug
inferno6–13-0.056%14 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0416%12 Aug
anubis3–13-0.058%12 Aug
cache7–13-0.0213%12 Aug
ancient13–30.0414%12 Aug
nuke9–130.0319%12 Aug
inferno7–130.028%12 Aug
inferno1–9-0.200%2 Aug
inferno5–9-0.078%2 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0110%2 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0310%2 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0112%2 Aug
inferno4–90.0415%2 Aug
inferno3–9-0.0721%2 Aug
inferno13–100.0314%30 Jul
dust210–13-0.0411%30 Jul
nuke13–100.029%11 Jul
anubis7–13-0.057%11 Jul
dust22–13-0.0714%11 Jul
mirage5–0-0.0230%11 Jul
anubis13–60.0116%11 Jul
nuke16–130.0518%10 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0825%10 Jul
mirage13–30.0815%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →