tapxenox99 — CS2 Stats
76561198727477268[U:1:767211540]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.
Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · −2.7pp headshot accuracy · −106ms reaction
Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.06), so results shifted more than performance did.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 3–2 · 60% win rate
- Avg rating 0.10
- Avg headshot accuracy 20%
- Avg reaction 363ms
Last 10
- 4–6 · 40% win rate
- Avg rating 0.06
- Avg headshot accuracy 21%
- Avg reaction 389ms
Last 20
- 12–8 · 60% win rate
- Avg rating 0.03
- Avg headshot accuracy 22%
- Avg reaction 442ms
Newest first, from the last 72 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
Counter-strafing. Only 55% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 72 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 72 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 inferno | B | 21 | 10–11 | 48% | 0.02 |
 nuke | S | 15 | 11–4 | 73% | 0.04 |
 vertigo | C | 9 | 4–5 | 44% | -0.02 |
 mirage | C | 7 | 3–4 | 43% | 0.01 |
 anubis | D | 7 | 1–6 | 14% | -0.03 |
 cache | — | 4 | 0–4 | 0% | -0.02 |
 dust2 | — | 3 | 2–1 | 67% | -0.05 |
 train | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.03 |
 ancient | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.02 |
 overpass | — | 2 | 0–2 | 0% | -0.11 |
Across the last 72 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4367 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.0475% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mirage | 13–11 | 0.23 | 17% | 9 Sept → | |
| inferno | 9–5 | 0.28 | 24% | 9 Sept → | |
| inferno | 13–16 | 0.02 | 15% | 8 Sept → | |
| anubis | 6–13 | -0.04 | 24% | 7 Sept → | |
| train | 13–2 | 0.02 | 20% | 4 Sept → | |
| cache | 8–13 | 0.02 | 16% | 3 Sept → | |
| ancient | 5–13 | -0.02 | 27% | 3 Sept → | |
| nuke | 2–13 | -0.03 | 16% | 3 Sept → | |
| anubis | 6–13 | -0.01 | 22% | 3 Sept → | |
| inferno | 9–1 | 0.17 | 26% | 3 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | 0.12 | 38% | 3 Sept → | |
| mirage | 10–13 | -0.05 | 23% | 3 Sept → | |
| cache | 2–13 | 0.06 | 14% | 3 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–3 | -0.04 | 26% | 3 Sept → | |
| mirage | 13–2 | -0.00 | 25% | 3 Sept → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | 0.01 | 40% | 2 Sept → | |
| anubis | 13–4 | 0.06 | 46% | 2 Sept → | |
| dust2 | 13–8 | -0.07 | 7% | 31 Aug → | |
| mirage | 13–4 | -0.06 | 8% | 31 Aug → | |
| ancient | 13–8 | -0.02 | 7% | 30 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 13–4 | -0.03 | 11% | 30 Aug → | |
| cache | 4–13 | -0.12 | 11% | 30 Aug → | |
| train | 3–13 | -0.07 | 6% | 30 Aug → | |
| cache | 12–12 | -0.04 | 32% | 30 Aug → | |
| inferno | 9–5 | -0.16 | 12% | 30 Aug → | |
| anubis | 9–13 | -0.12 | 10% | 26 Aug → | |
| inferno | 3–9 | -0.10 | 13% | 25 Aug → | |
| dust2 | 2–13 | -0.04 | 29% | 25 Aug → | |
| anubis | 12–12 | -0.05 | 15% | 25 Aug → | |
| mirage | 5–13 | -0.08 | 27% | 25 Aug → | |
| anubis | 0–13 | -0.06 | 18% | 25 Aug → | |
| nuke | 9–6 | -0.06 | 19% | 28 Apr → | |
| inferno | 6–9 | -0.05 | 39% | 28 Apr → | |
| inferno | 7–9 | -0.04 | 5% | 25 Apr → | |
| overpass | 1–9 | -0.17 | 7% | 25 Apr → | |
| mirage | 2–8 | 0.02 | 29% | 23 Apr → | |
| inferno | 9–2 | 0.16 | 14% | 23 Apr → | |
| nuke | 9–3 | 0.19 | 5% | 23 Apr → | |
| vertigo | 7–9 | -0.05 | 13% | 20 Apr → | |
| inferno | 3–9 | -0.19 | 16% | 20 Apr → | |
| inferno | 6–9 | 0.09 | 21% | 7 Apr → | |
| vertigo | 9–6 | 0.07 | 10% | 7 Apr → | |
| vertigo | 9–7 | -0.15 | 15% | 6 Apr → | |
| inferno | 9–3 | 0.05 | 64% | 6 Apr → | |
| nuke | 6–9 | -0.10 | 31% | 6 Apr → | |
| nuke | 8–8 | 0.04 | 10% | 23 Mar → | |
| anubis | 2–13 | 0.01 | 10% | 23 Mar → | |
| inferno | 9–6 | 0.09 | 9% | 23 Mar → | |
| nuke | 9–4 | 0.10 | 28% | 23 Mar → | |
| mirage | 7–13 | 0.01 | 20% | 21 Mar → | |
| vertigo | 12–12 | 0.05 | 18% | 21 Mar → | |
| vertigo | 9–6 | 0.06 | 15% | 20 Mar → | |
| nuke | 9–7 | 0.01 | 15% | 20 Mar → | |
| inferno | 4–9 | -0.07 | 28% | 20 Mar → | |
| inferno | 6–9 | -0.06 | 10% | 20 Mar → | |
| nuke | 9–7 | -0.03 | 31% | 20 Mar → | |
| vertigo | 8–8 | -0.06 | 11% | 20 Mar → | |
| inferno | 9–7 | -0.01 | 17% | 20 Mar → | |
| nuke | 9–0 | 0.40 | 32% | 20 Mar → | |
| inferno | 8–8 | 0.01 | 18% | 18 Mar → | |
| vertigo | 6–9 | -0.09 | 13% | 18 Mar → | |
| inferno | 9–3 | 0.18 | 32% | 18 Mar → | |
| nuke | 9–5 | 0.00 | 27% | 18 Mar → | |
| inferno | 7–9 | -0.03 | 15% | 18 Mar → | |
| inferno | 1–9 | -0.23 | 16% | 18 Mar → | |
| nuke | 9–6 | 0.10 | 43% | 18 Mar → | |
| vertigo | 8–8 | -0.01 | 35% | 17 Mar → | |
| inferno | 9–5 | 0.11 | 17% | 17 Mar → | |
| overpass | 4–9 | -0.06 | 13% | 17 Mar → | |
| vertigo | 9–3 | 0.02 | 5% | 17 Mar → | |
| inferno | 9–2 | 0.25 | 7% | 17 Mar → | |
| nuke | 1–9 | -0.11 | 11% | 17 Mar → |
Match data via Leetify.
