Naga

Naga — CS2 Stats

76561198705662964[U:1:745397236]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

612Tracked matches53%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,137Purple band · top ~23.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19243 of 33036 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNagaFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER16,137 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning62
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5743Last 10057%Win rateLLWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression8.8
Utility5.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning6.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time634ms+61ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy25.6%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 24.8% → last ⅓ avg 25.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — cache 13–5
131Biggest win — anubis
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
124In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 81% over 16infernoWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26141254%0.01
mirageA25151060%0.02
cacheS1613381%0.05
ancientB147750%0.01
anubisA85363%0.05
infernoD71614%0.00
nuke31233%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

277Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
74.0ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8046%0.9714.4
Dust26356%1.0815.1
Ancient3847%0.9314.9
Inferno3549%1.0014.0
Anubis3050%0.9915.2
Nuke1436%0.8613.1
Cache1060%1.1716.1
Overpass771%0.9513.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.0%Headshot accuracy
31.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
625msReaction time
37.9%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
7.17HE damage / grenade
7.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.8631% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.0227%13 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0123%31 Jul
dust213–100.0526%31 Jul
ancient13–80.0321%31 Jul
dust28–130.0429%30 Jul
mirage13–40.1231%30 Jul
mirage10–130.1125%29 Jul
dust213–11-0.0033%29 Jul
vertigo13–30.0436%29 Jul
dust210–13-0.0041%28 Jul
ancient5–13-0.1017%28 Jul
ancient9–130.0532%27 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0533%27 Jul
cache13–70.0633%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0029%26 Jul
dust213–110.0231%25 Jul
ancient13–100.0825%25 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0228%25 Jul
ancient13–100.0618%25 Jul
dust213–110.0132%24 Jul
dust213–90.0226%24 Jul
inferno8–130.0419%24 Jul
ancient13–40.0329%24 Jul
inferno12–160.0219%23 Jul
cache13–8-0.0418%23 Jul
cache13–20.0740%23 Jul
inferno13–110.0429%23 Jul
dust210–130.0328%22 Jul
dust21–5-0.120%22 Jul
mirage13–40.0316%22 Jul
anubis13–10.0511%22 Jul
anubis13–30.0420%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0218%22 Jul
dust213–80.0119%21 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0522%21 Jul
dust29–13-0.0229%21 Jul
dust29–130.0325%21 Jul
cache13–100.0633%21 Jul
mirage13–50.1133%21 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0022%21 Jul
mirage13–50.0621%20 Jul
inferno11–130.0625%20 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0730%20 Jul
ancient1–6-0.0850%20 Jul
cache0–13-0.030%20 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0442%20 Jul
mirage16–120.0318%20 Jul
cache13–50.1425%20 Jul
anubis13–70.0825%20 Jul
cache13–80.0737%20 Jul
mirage13–50.0134%20 Jul
anubis13–30.0932%20 Jul
cache13–70.0723%20 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0433%19 Jul
mirage13–40.0744%19 Jul
cache13–110.0725%19 Jul
anubis9–130.1228%19 Jul
mirage13–10.1015%19 Jul
dust213–60.1329%19 Jul
dust26–13-0.0332%19 Jul
dust27–13-0.0825%18 Jul
cache13–70.1033%18 Jul
ancient13–40.0633%18 Jul
dust213–110.1127%18 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0125%17 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0143%17 Jul
mirage13–100.0359%17 Jul
ancient7–130.0239%17 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0032%17 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0220%17 Jul
dust20–13-0.0918%17 Jul
cache13–110.0826%17 Jul
mirage13–110.0536%17 Jul
cache0–13-0.100%17 Jul
dust213–90.0541%16 Jul
dust29–13-0.0929%16 Jul
cache13–110.0019%16 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0122%16 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0218%15 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0935%15 Jul
ancient13–70.0115%13 Jul
ancient10–130.0118%13 Jul
dust28–13-0.0526%13 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0520%13 Jul
anubis9–130.0919%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0322%10 Jul
ancient13–2-0.047%10 Jul
dust213–11-0.0224%10 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0535%9 Jul
mirage3–100.0824%9 Jul
dust213–20.0533%9 Jul
dust27–00.1431%6 Jul
dust211–40.0630%5 Jul
cache13–70.0933%4 Jul
cache13–100.1023%4 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0420%3 Jul
mirage13–70.0426%3 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0732%3 Jul
dust213–70.0129%3 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0119%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →