pope

pope — CS2 Stats

76561198448198880[U:1:487933152]Steam profile ↗

4,258Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,372Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1741 of 8529 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,080 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpopeFACEITLevel 9 · 2,080 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,372 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning51
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51463Last 10051%Win rateLLWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.08 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3
Aggression6.9
Utility5.7
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.1
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy25.9%+2.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 25.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — nuke 13–6
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 5nukeWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B31151648%0.01
mirageA22121055%-0.00
ancientA169756%0.02
anubisA148657%0.01
nukeC104640%-0.00
infernoA53260%-0.00
cache2020%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,692Matches
51%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
81.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust217258%1.2117.9
Mirage13545%1.0616.2
Anubis11151%1.1717.4
Ancient10252%1.0916.6
Inferno7340%1.0016.9
Nuke3845%1.0316.7
Overpass3444%1.1016.6
Vertigo1450%1.0918.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
574msReaction time
26.6%T opening success
49.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
11.09HE damage / grenade
10.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6328% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis10–13-0.0037%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0726%28 Aug
dust213–1-0.0123%28 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0722%27 Aug
mirage11–130.0424%27 Aug
mirage13–30.0021%27 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0829%27 Aug
dust213–20.0220%27 Aug
mirage16–120.0229%27 Aug
nuke13–70.0117%27 Aug
anubis11–130.0221%27 Aug
anubis13–30.0217%27 Aug
dust212–160.0011%26 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0314%26 Aug
dust213–100.1627%26 Aug
ancient13–100.1322%25 Aug
nuke13–60.2220%24 Aug
dust213–00.1316%24 Aug
ancient13–10.1039%24 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0816%25 Jul
dust213–60.0030%24 Jul
cache3–13-0.0336%7 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0731%20 Jun
dust213–10-0.0117%19 Jun
dust21–13-0.090%17 Jun
mirage4–130.0438%14 Jun
anubis13–70.0224%14 Jun
dust213–70.0220%13 Jun
cache8–130.0137%20 May
inferno13–100.0423%19 May
dust211–13-0.0630%17 May
ancient1–13-0.03100%16 May
mirage5–13-0.0320%16 May
anubis13–160.0222%15 May
anubis13–11-0.0415%14 May
nuke9–130.0223%13 May
anubis13–7-0.0237%11 May
ancient13–10-0.0529%11 May
mirage13–50.0023%11 May
mirage13–90.0316%11 May
dust27–13-0.0339%7 May
mirage3–13-0.0528%3 May
mirage11–13-0.0126%2 May
dust27–13-0.0330%1 May
dust213–16-0.0612%30 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0323%30 Apr
dust211–130.0622%29 Apr
mirage13–10-0.0018%29 Apr
dust213–40.0445%29 Apr
dust23–13-0.0713%26 Apr
nuke13–3-0.0611%26 Apr
dust213–1-0.0515%26 Apr
mirage13–90.0214%26 Apr
dust21–13-0.068%25 Apr
dust212–160.1121%25 Apr
anubis2–50.0243%25 Apr
anubis13–00.000%25 Apr
dust29–130.0919%25 Apr
dust213–110.1225%24 Apr
dust213–8-0.0112%24 Apr
dust211–130.0340%23 Apr
mirage13–110.0823%23 Apr
ancient3–130.0135%23 Apr
ancient15–150.0422%23 Apr
anubis13–40.0621%23 Apr
nuke13–90.0124%22 Apr
mirage13–110.0218%22 Apr
mirage13–110.0022%22 Apr
dust214–160.0333%21 Apr
ancient10–130.0624%19 Apr
ancient1–130.0818%19 Apr
mirage13–80.0224%19 Apr
dust213–60.0920%19 Apr
inferno11–130.0232%16 Apr
anubis11–130.0111%16 Apr
dust213–80.0316%15 Apr
dust213–4-0.0418%14 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0020%13 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0430%12 Apr
inferno13–100.0422%12 Apr
ancient19–17-0.0314%12 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0024%10 Apr
anubis13–20.0427%7 Apr
dust22–60.0231%7 Apr
nuke15–15-0.0631%7 Apr
anubis16–140.0535%7 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0026%7 Apr
inferno5–13-0.085%5 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0525%5 Apr
dust213–80.0425%5 Apr
ancient13–00.0120%5 Apr
mirage16–14-0.0222%5 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0325%5 Apr
ancient13–30.0844%5 Apr
dust210–13-0.0329%5 Apr
dust26–13-0.0123%5 Apr
nuke8–130.0723%4 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0021%2 Apr
anubis4–13-0.0513%1 Apr
mirage13–90.0618%1 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →