pope

pope — CS2 Stats

76561198448198880[U:1:487933152]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,424Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,354Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#62789 of 251273 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,080 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,354 -3,018 28 Aug – 11 Oct · 30 days played
20,87224,653peak 24,65328 Aug11 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,080 +0 28 Aug – 30 Aug · 2 observations
2,0802,080peak 2,08028 Aug30 Aug
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,080Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,080
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 420 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,299 below peak (24,653)
  • -2,130 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,646 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpopeFACEITLevel 9 · 2,080 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,354 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,080csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning68
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–52–5Last 10043%Win rateLLWWLLLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +7.5pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.9
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 64% on T to 48% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.8
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time586ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−6.4%
first ⅓ avg 26.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 8 Oct →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 21 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 9 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 28 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 16nukeWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B3014–1647%-0.02
mirageC187–1139%-0.03
infernoS1611–569%-0.02
ancientC135–838%-0.00
anubisC114–736%-0.01
cacheD72–529%-0.02
nukeD50–50%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,694Matches
51%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
81.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust217457%1.2117.8
Mirage13545%1.0616.2
Anubis11151%1.1717.4
Ancient10252%1.0916.6
Inferno7340%1.0016.9
Nuke3845%1.0316.7
Overpass3444%1.1016.6
Vertigo1450%1.0918.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
576msReaction time
63.6%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
10.03HE damage / grenade
5.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4206 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.0429%11 Oct →
anubis9–130.0818%11 Oct →
cache16–140.0133%11 Oct →
mirage8–00.0330%11 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0531%11 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0217%11 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.078%9 Oct →
nuke15–150.0915%8 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0219%8 Oct →
dust213–50.1135%8 Oct →
dust213–11-0.047%7 Oct →
inferno13–40.0018%6 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0616%5 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0511%4 Oct →
dust25–130.0125%4 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0715%3 Oct →
dust212–16-0.0325%3 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0314%2 Oct →
anubis13–30.0110%29 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0517%29 Sept →
cache10–130.019%28 Sept →
anubis16–13-0.0623%28 Sept →
mirage13–00.0122%28 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0228%27 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.0335%27 Sept →
cache13–0-0.0415%27 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0824%27 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0420%27 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0112%27 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0521%27 Sept →
anubis9–130.0229%27 Sept →
inferno13–70.0221%27 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0310%27 Sept →
dust213–110.0123%27 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.1019%26 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0321%26 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0123%26 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0819%26 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0311%26 Sept →
inferno13–40.0617%25 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0417%25 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0529%25 Sept →
dust213–60.0730%25 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0118%24 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0417%24 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0037%23 Sept →
inferno13–60.0022%23 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0210%23 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0832%21 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0922%21 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0220%21 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0755%21 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0428%20 Sept →
mirage13–70.0232%20 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0733%20 Sept →
ancient13–80.0529%20 Sept →
dust213–160.0324%20 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0229%20 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0327%19 Sept →
mirage9–130.0016%19 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0415%19 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0128%19 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0421%19 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0628%19 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.1014%17 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0316%16 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0130%16 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0835%16 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0526%15 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0450%15 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0815%15 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0432%14 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0216%14 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0527%14 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0215%13 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0518%13 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0525%13 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0128%13 Sept →
dust213–70.0219%13 Sept →
ancient15–150.0818%13 Sept →
dust213–50.1042%12 Sept →
mirage16–130.0021%12 Sept →
anubis13–70.0829%12 Sept →
ancient13–70.0435%12 Sept →
cache9–130.0535%11 Sept →
dust213–160.0527%11 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0417%11 Sept →
ancient13–80.0321%10 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0417%10 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0728%10 Sept →
ancient13–70.0130%10 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0338%10 Sept →
mirage11–130.0330%10 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0733%10 Sept →
inferno6–130.0413%9 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.038%9 Sept →
dust213–70.0422%9 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0430%9 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0743%8 Sept →
ancient7–130.0729%8 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.