Eläkeläinen

Eläkeläinen — CS2 Stats

76561198435224902[U:1:474959174]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,252Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 3 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,953 -2,766 4 Feb17 Jun · 42 days played
16,50719,719peak 19,7194 Feb17 Jun
19,719Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2026-02-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEläkeläinenFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning31
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD375310Last 10037%Win rateLLLTLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · −0ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 041 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 663ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 663ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility5.3
Positioning3.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 31% on CT to 13% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 642ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning3.1
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time652ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 6 Mar
32%Best headshot accuracy · 9–4 · inferno, 7 Apr
453msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 6 Feb
13–1Biggest win · cache, 29 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L3Current streak
34In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 5dust2Weakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2181338%-0.01
mirageC2081240%-0.01
dust2D1741324%-0.03
nukeB126650%0.02
infernoC114736%0.02
anubisD62433%0.01
cacheA53260%-0.01
vertigo41325%-0.01
overpass31233%0.05
sanctum1010%-0.29

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

61Matches
61%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
73.3ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage560%0.8815.4
Anubis4100%1.0814.0
Ancient367%1.0215.3
Overpass3100%1.3218.3
Nuke250%0.285.0
Dust2250%0.7815.5
Vertigo250%0.498.5
Train1100%1.1219.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.6%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
642msReaction time
12.6%T opening success
31.3%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
10.24HE damage / grenade
7.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.068% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 12.6477% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.059%26 Aug
anubis5–130.0120%24 Aug
inferno2–100.0115%19 Jul
cache12–12-0.0113%3 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0412%3 Jul
dust213–100.0015%17 Jun
dust216–13-0.0414%13 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0910%14 May
mirage13–9-0.0414%14 May
dust27–13-0.0316%13 May
anubis6–13-0.0528%13 May
ancient5–13-0.0414%7 May
ancient13–90.056%5 May
cache12–12-0.0614%29 Apr
cache13–80.0817%29 Apr
cache13–8-0.027%29 Apr
cache13–1-0.0224%29 Apr
nuke8–13-0.1111%22 Apr
ancient13–9-0.013%21 Apr
mirage13–80.0013%21 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0718%21 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0811%20 Apr
anubis5–10.0213%20 Apr
mirage8–13-0.016%20 Apr
dust23–13-0.0318%16 Apr
nuke13–90.0323%14 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0213%13 Apr
dust27–13-0.0120%13 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0816%12 Apr
nuke13–90.0115%12 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0113%9 Apr
vertigo6–90.0114%7 Apr
nuke9–60.1110%7 Apr
inferno9–40.2132%7 Apr
mirage4–13-0.036%7 Apr
ancient16–13-0.0111%1 Apr
sanctum1–9-0.2917%1 Apr
dust29–130.0216%31 Mar
inferno13–30.0117%31 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0120%29 Mar
vertigo12–120.0618%29 Mar
vertigo4–00.0025%29 Mar
mirage3–130.0314%29 Mar
nuke8–80.1013%29 Mar
overpass9–40.1111%29 Mar
inferno1–9-0.175%29 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0214%28 Mar
dust29–130.0511%28 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0215%28 Mar
inferno7–13-0.048%28 Mar
ancient13–80.0710%28 Mar
vertigo2–9-0.1025%28 Mar
nuke9–40.1613%28 Mar
overpass5–13-0.0620%25 Mar
dust25–13-0.0711%19 Mar
nuke11–130.0211%18 Mar
anubis7–130.0025%18 Mar
dust215–15-0.027%13 Mar
ancient13–80.0312%8 Mar
mirage13–10-0.046%8 Mar
ancient13–80.066%8 Mar
dust29–130.0018%7 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0223%7 Mar
dust215–150.0213%6 Mar
inferno9–10.2417%6 Mar
nuke11–13-0.047%2 Mar
ancient15–150.0611%1 Mar
ancient13–10-0.018%28 Feb
mirage15–150.0315%26 Feb
inferno13–80.1020%26 Feb
nuke13–110.0231%25 Feb
nuke13–110.0113%24 Feb
mirage13–50.0923%24 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0611%19 Feb
mirage13–70.0721%19 Feb
dust27–13-0.049%18 Feb
nuke9–130.0121%18 Feb
mirage11–130.0218%16 Feb
mirage8–130.028%15 Feb
dust29–13-0.0125%15 Feb
dust210–13-0.1216%14 Feb
inferno15–15-0.0313%10 Feb
anubis13–80.1212%10 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0316%10 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0016%10 Feb
inferno3–13-0.0113%10 Feb
dust213–7-0.0513%8 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0113%8 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0418%7 Feb
dust213–11-0.0625%6 Feb
ancient3–13-0.120%6 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0513%6 Feb
ancient8–130.009%6 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0311%5 Feb
overpass7–130.0923%5 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0614%5 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0018%5 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0311%4 Feb
dust23–13-0.049%4 Feb
inferno15–15-0.0214%3 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →