SoftArska

SoftArska — CS2 Stats

76561199056344435[U:1:1096078707]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,208Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,519Purple band · top ~14.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#94768 of 230608 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,208 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 16 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,519 -2,241 16 Mar18 Sept · 30 days played
17,56320,765peak 20,76516 Mar18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,174 +0 3 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
1,1741,174peak 1,1743 Sept18 Sept
21,547Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,174Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-03-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,174
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 27 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,246 below peak (20,765)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,481 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSoftArskaPREMIER18,519 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,174csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning47
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44524Last 10044%Win rateLWWWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · +43ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.5
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.7
Utility5.5
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time627ms−13ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.08Best match rating · 8–8 · inferno, 12 May
40%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · inferno, 28 May
422msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · inferno, 27 Mar
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 20 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB21101148%-0.03
infernoC1661038%-0.01
ancientB168850%-0.02
nukeB147750%-0.01
dust2C146843%-0.04
anubisC94544%-0.04
overpassA53260%-0.03
cache1010%0.05
alpine1010%-0.02
train1010%0.01
vertigo1010%0.02
office1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

272Matches
49%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
73.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5751%0.8913.7
Anubis4553%0.9113.8
Nuke3355%0.8913.9
Inferno2955%0.9515.0
Ancient2528%0.8513.4
Vertigo1850%0.7812.7
Dust21631%0.8714.2
Overpass922%0.7912.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
86.5%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
633msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
44.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
6.82HE damage / grenade
11.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.7072% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno5–13-0.0040%28 May
anubis13–100.0017%28 May
nuke16–140.0114%20 May
inferno13–70.0335%20 May
ancient13–8-0.0621%19 May
mirage8–13-0.0031%19 May
dust27–13-0.0411%14 May
cache7–130.0521%14 May
ancient13–11-0.0523%13 May
overpass13–7-0.0412%13 May
dust27–130.0216%13 May
anubis6–13-0.0512%13 May
nuke8–13-0.0820%12 May
inferno8–80.0832%12 May
dust27–13-0.0619%7 May
alpine4–13-0.0225%7 May
mirage13–11-0.0621%6 May
ancient13–8-0.0526%6 May
dust210–13-0.0419%6 May
overpass10–13-0.0722%5 May
mirage11–13-0.0722%5 May
inferno8–8-0.0413%5 May
nuke9–50.0228%5 May
nuke10–13-0.0413%5 May
mirage13–10-0.0219%30 Apr
inferno13–160.0223%30 Apr
ancient13–60.0310%30 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0311%29 Apr
nuke11–13-0.0213%29 Apr
train12–120.0116%21 Apr
ancient13–90.0020%21 Apr
mirage13–8-0.036%21 Apr
nuke13–3-0.0022%21 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0821%21 Apr
ancient13–10-0.0413%20 Apr
vertigo12–120.0215%20 Apr
ancient13–20.0315%20 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0523%20 Apr
dust213–50.0321%20 Apr
overpass13–9-0.0313%17 Apr
mirage13–10-0.039%17 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0217%17 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0515%17 Apr
anubis7–13-0.1023%17 Apr
ancient6–130.0010%17 Apr
anubis14–16-0.049%16 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0117%16 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0516%16 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0614%15 Apr
anubis10–0-0.0210%15 Apr
dust23–13-0.058%15 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0013%13 Apr
anubis13–4-0.0318%13 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0313%12 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0426%12 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0313%12 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0335%12 Apr
dust213–11-0.067%12 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0732%12 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0121%12 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0418%12 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0725%1 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0312%1 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0417%1 Apr
dust213–9-0.0327%1 Apr
mirage13–10-0.026%1 Apr
inferno3–13-0.0416%1 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0613%1 Apr
dust29–13-0.0417%31 Mar
inferno13–30.0421%31 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0335%28 Mar
dust29–13-0.087%28 Mar
mirage13–100.0015%28 Mar
inferno7–130.0410%28 Mar
ancient13–80.058%28 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0811%27 Mar
nuke6–13-0.0123%27 Mar
mirage16–130.0419%27 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0012%27 Mar
overpass13–11-0.0226%26 Mar
dust213–40.028%26 Mar
mirage10–130.0120%26 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0216%25 Mar
overpass5–130.0015%25 Mar
nuke13–70.0426%25 Mar
mirage14–160.0520%21 Mar
inferno2–13-0.0814%20 Mar
nuke13–70.0118%20 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0117%18 Mar
ancient5–13-0.057%18 Mar
dust27–13-0.0812%17 Mar
mirage5–13-0.053%17 Mar
inferno13–60.0117%17 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0326%17 Mar
dust213–2-0.0413%17 Mar
office5–13-0.0622%16 Mar
dust213–11-0.055%16 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0712%16 Mar
nuke13–70.0615%16 Mar
inferno13–3-0.0325%16 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →