applepiefly — CS2 Stats

76561198397202956[U:1:436937228]

2,365Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,318Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,885Purple band · top ~9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8289 of 18341 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=201), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate54.3%48.1%above
Shot accuracy3.9%12.9%8.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.080.09 short
Match win rate39.5%46.5%7.0% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGapplepieflyPREMIER19,885 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning70
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5050Last 10050%Win rateWLLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2
Aggression6.5
Utility3.1
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning7.0
Utility3.1
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time557ms−73ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — inferno 13–6
131Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
139In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 14nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA26151158%0.01
dust2C146843%-0.01
infernoA149564%0.01
ancientB136746%0.01
anubisC114736%-0.01
cacheA106460%0.03
nukeD72529%-0.02
office21150%-0.02
overpass21150%0.01
shelter1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

61,231Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
3,877Matches
39.5%Match win rate
54.3%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
3.9%Shot accuracy
7,488MVPs
1,318Hours (in match)
1,634Bombs planted
395Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,030
AWP3,486
MP91,110
Knife858

Lifetime map wins

4,360inferno
4,102dust2
2,631nuke
1,669vertigo
563train
533office
87lake
72safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

808Matches
49%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
86.6ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25249%1.0617.5
Inferno11152%1.1417.8
Ancient10153%1.1518.7
Dust29438%1.0316.6
Anubis8747%1.0716.9
Vertigo7758%1.1618.1
Nuke6045%1.0617.1
Overpass1338%1.1819.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
75.6%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
550msReaction time
35.8%T opening success
46.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
6.44HE damage / grenade
3.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.3505 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7556% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–60.0523%22 Aug
anubis7–130.0216%22 Aug
dust27–130.0218%17 Aug
nuke13–110.0216%17 Aug
ancient13–70.0420%17 Aug
inferno13–60.1725%17 Aug
cache7–130.0021%17 Aug
cache13–100.1421%16 Aug
ancient17–190.0216%16 Aug
inferno13–110.0219%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0924%16 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0219%12 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0022%12 Aug
mirage13–90.0826%12 Aug
cache13–9-0.0120%12 Aug
cache10–13-0.0724%11 Aug
cache10–13-0.0219%11 Aug
dust213–110.0117%11 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0217%11 Aug
ancient13–80.0218%11 Aug
mirage13–11-0.059%11 Aug
dust213–70.0127%11 Aug
anubis13–10.0011%11 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0624%11 Aug
mirage13–100.0420%11 Aug
ancient11–130.0023%10 Aug
nuke13–160.0114%10 Aug
mirage13–60.0730%10 Aug
office13–90.0121%10 Aug
inferno10–130.0412%31 Jul
dust210–130.0012%31 Jul
cache13–60.0317%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0322%31 Jul
cache11–130.0422%30 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0616%29 Jul
cache13–10.088%29 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0221%29 Jul
dust29–13-0.0210%29 Jul
inferno13–8-0.039%29 Jul
mirage13–20.0216%26 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0110%26 Jul
inferno10–130.0920%26 Jul
mirage13–100.0316%25 Jul
mirage13–90.0416%25 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0311%25 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0314%25 Jul
cache13–11-0.0221%25 Jul
anubis9–130.0121%25 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0716%25 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0123%25 Jul
inferno13–110.0115%19 Jul
inferno6–130.0511%19 Jul
mirage3–130.0015%19 Jul
mirage13–80.0419%18 Jul
cache13–60.0816%18 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0310%18 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0214%18 Jul
inferno8–13-0.066%11 Jul
mirage8–130.0519%11 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0513%11 Jul
mirage13–40.0513%11 Jul
shelter9–13-0.0213%10 Jul
dust213–11-0.0616%9 Jul
ancient13–80.0314%7 Jul
ancient13–50.0816%6 Jul
nuke5–9-0.0116%4 Jul
office3–13-0.0432%4 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0524%4 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0414%4 Jul
inferno13–20.0717%3 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0221%2 Jul
mirage13–40.0514%2 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0213%2 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0114%1 Jul
ancient13–50.0620%1 Jul
anubis6–13-0.058%1 Jul
ancient13–110.0431%1 Jul
overpass9–13-0.0113%28 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0622%27 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0017%27 Jun
dust26–13-0.0418%25 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0121%24 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0913%24 Jun
overpass13–20.0414%24 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0617%24 Jun
mirage16–140.0631%24 Jun
dust29–13-0.0328%24 Jun
anubis9–130.0425%23 Jun
mirage13–80.0230%23 Jun
inferno13–110.0216%23 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0214%23 Jun
dust28–13-0.0116%23 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0413%21 Jun
dust25–13-0.0122%21 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0523%21 Jun
dust213–9-0.0027%20 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0325%20 Jun
dust216–130.0422%20 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0327%20 Jun
dust213–16-0.0424%20 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →