turky

turky — CS2 Stats

US76561198396496946[U:1:436231218]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,747Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.6 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,595Blue band · top ~30.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,204 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 29 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,595 +1,014 7 Sept18 Sept · 5 days played
13,35814,595peak 14,5957 Sept18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,204 +0 28 Aug5 Sept · 3 observations
1,2041,204peak 1,20428 Aug5 Sept
14,595Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,204Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-05-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,204
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 147 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 14,595
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 405 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGturkyFACEITLevel 5 · 1,204 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,595 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,204csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning54
Utility4

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateLWWWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim4.4
Utility0.4
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 67% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning5.4
Utility0.4
Mechanics3.0
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 3.6/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time622ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy15.5%+0.0%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–10 · nuke, 13 Sept
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · inferno, 1 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 12 Jun
13–3Biggest win · anubis, 5 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
1014In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 75% over 12mirageWeakest map · 37% over 27
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27101737%-0.00
anubisB157847%0.01
dust2A148657%-0.00
nukeC135838%0.01
cacheS129375%0.01
ancientS96367%-0.00
inferno41325%0.02
vertigo43175%0.06
shelter1010%0.04
overpass110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 27). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,959Matches
47%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
79.4ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage122947%0.9715.5
Anubis77246%0.9415.5
Dust276348%0.9015.3
Ancient75650%0.9515.8
Vertigo38947%1.0015.1
Inferno36943%0.8314.2
Nuke32749%1.0115.6
Train19647%1.0816.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
63.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
618msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
53.6%CT opening success
0.03Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
3.68HE damage / grenade
0.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.032 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.3748% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 27 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–130.0313%19 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0022%19 Sept
cache13–100.0014%18 Sept
ancient13–110.036%18 Sept
nuke13–160.0019%17 Sept
mirage6–130.0330%17 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0411%14 Sept
cache11–13-0.0325%13 Sept
nuke13–100.1019%13 Sept
nuke13–110.0116%13 Sept
inferno9–130.0811%10 Sept
mirage10–130.0318%10 Sept
dust213–110.0817%7 Sept
anubis11–130.0812%6 Sept
anubis11–13-0.0219%6 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0515%6 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0416%6 Sept
anubis16–140.029%5 Sept
dust211–130.0519%4 Sept
mirage13–60.0617%4 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0213%4 Sept
mirage13–90.0115%30 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0319%30 Aug
mirage13–80.0114%30 Aug
anubis16–120.0021%30 Aug
cache16–12-0.0015%30 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0215%30 Aug
anubis13–6-0.039%30 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0118%28 Aug
dust24–13-0.080%28 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0114%26 Aug
ancient6–130.0220%26 Aug
vertigo13–90.0811%21 Aug
dust210–13-0.048%21 Aug
anubis13–90.068%19 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0024%15 Aug
ancient17–190.0019%15 Aug
vertigo11–130.017%14 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0517%9 Aug
vertigo16–130.068%9 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0013%7 Aug
vertigo13–60.0819%6 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0117%6 Aug
shelter6–130.0422%5 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0914%2 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0417%31 Jul
nuke13–90.0229%31 Jul
nuke8–130.0334%31 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0217%29 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0111%27 Jul
dust213–70.0327%26 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0414%25 Jul
mirage19–16-0.0317%25 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0219%23 Jul
dust28–13-0.0217%21 Jul
cache13–9-0.0327%20 Jul
cache13–11-0.0115%20 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0325%17 Jul
dust213–7-0.0211%13 Jul
mirage13–100.0216%13 Jul
cache13–7-0.0018%13 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0024%9 Jul
dust213–110.0523%5 Jul
cache13–50.0413%5 Jul
cache13–50.0614%5 Jul
overpass13–80.0920%5 Jul
nuke13–160.0521%5 Jul
dust25–13-0.1116%5 Jul
anubis13–30.0623%5 Jul
ancient13–30.0320%4 Jul
mirage11–130.098%4 Jul
dust213–3-0.0618%4 Jul
inferno13–100.0448%1 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0014%1 Jul
cache13–40.0522%30 Jun
cache11–130.0010%30 Jun
anubis11–130.0117%28 Jun
inferno12–16-0.0310%28 Jun
anubis15–15-0.019%27 Jun
ancient13–90.0213%27 Jun
dust24–130.0114%23 Jun
dust213–110.0217%23 Jun
mirage13–50.016%22 Jun
mirage7–13-0.060%22 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0311%21 Jun
dust213–90.0124%20 Jun
mirage10–130.0522%20 Jun
dust216–140.0318%19 Jun
mirage6–130.0026%14 Jun
mirage6–130.0211%14 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0611%12 Jun
anubis8–130.0213%12 Jun
nuke13–60.0419%10 Jun
mirage14–160.049%6 Jun
ancient14–16-0.017%3 Jun
cache13–7-0.0120%31 May
mirage13–70.0316%30 May
anubis13–70.056%30 May
ancient13–3-0.0516%30 May
nuke7–13-0.0417%29 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →