Green Eyes!

Green Eyes! — CS2 Stats

US76561197960379718[U:1:113990]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,920Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,759 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (16 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,759 → 1,759
+13Tracked matches · now 2,920
−1.6ppWin rate · 46.4% → 44.8%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 25 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

1,759Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2025-12-25

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,759
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 242 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGreen Eyes!FACEITLevel 6 · 1,759 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPEAK ELO1,759csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning55
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47503Last 10047%Win rateLWWLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · +21ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility7.1
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch4.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 606ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning5.5
Utility7.1
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time608ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 14 Jan
33%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · anubis, 10 Jan
422msFastest reaction time · 9–3 · vertigo, 4 Jan
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1911858%0.02
ancientA1811761%0.03
anubisD1751229%0.01
dust2D1641225%0.04
nukeB137654%0.02
vertigoS64267%0.01
cache42250%-0.02
inferno32167%0.02
train21150%0.02
alpine1010%0.01
stronghold1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,359Matches
49%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
82.1ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage27054%1.2416.7
Ancient17348%1.1817.4
Dust216952%1.3117.0
Anubis14347%1.2117.1
Train7639%1.1816.6
Inferno6231%1.0815.9
Nuke5151%1.1615.9
Vertigo2850%1.3018.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
32.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
70.9%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
606msReaction time
27.4%T opening success
43.4%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
11.22HE damage / grenade
12.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.3702% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–13-0.0522%19 Sept
nuke13–60.0117%19 Sept
mirage13–90.0226%11 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0116%6 Sept
dust213–70.1011%4 Sept
dust211–130.0710%4 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0224%4 Sept
dust213–60.0918%4 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0117%28 Aug
dust24–13-0.0423%28 Aug
mirage13–160.0512%28 Aug
vertigo13–90.0328%21 Aug
dust210–130.0513%21 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0814%15 Aug
ancient17–19-0.0310%15 Aug
vertigo11–130.0814%14 Aug
mirage8–13-0.038%9 Aug
vertigo16–130.0613%9 Aug
anubis13–00.0726%7 Aug
mirage15–150.0115%7 Aug
ancient13–110.009%7 Aug
vertigo13–6-0.0815%6 Aug
mirage13–60.0215%6 Aug
nuke15–19-0.0222%2 Aug
inferno13–110.0531%31 Jul
dust25–130.0815%31 Jul
ancient13–40.0315%31 Jul
nuke8–130.0220%31 Jul
anubis5–13-0.039%29 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0132%27 Jul
cache13–110.0221%25 Jul
dust27–130.0724%25 Jul
dust212–12-0.028%25 Jul
dust28–13-0.0215%21 Jul
ancient13–110.0721%17 Jul
dust213–9-0.0515%4 Jul
dust21–13-0.0230%4 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0423%4 Jul
cache13–4-0.0413%30 Jun
mirage13–50.1722%22 Jun
mirage7–130.0223%22 Jun
anubis8–130.0015%12 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0618%12 May
cache7–13-0.0317%5 May
mirage5–13-0.0610%29 Apr
alpine12–120.0117%26 Apr
nuke13–30.0816%19 Apr
anubis13–6-0.017%11 Mar
vertigo11–130.0118%11 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0317%13 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0118%13 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0112%12 Feb
ancient13–110.0429%12 Feb
mirage13–100.0220%8 Feb
anubis13–70.0212%8 Feb
mirage22–190.0317%8 Feb
dust29–130.0313%8 Feb
mirage13–80.0113%8 Feb
ancient10–130.0215%8 Feb
anubis9–130.0214%7 Feb
dust216–19-0.0118%7 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0421%7 Feb
ancient13–50.1020%7 Feb
anubis3–130.0113%7 Feb
ancient11–130.046%7 Feb
ancient12–160.0414%4 Feb
dust27–130.0114%4 Feb
ancient13–50.1021%4 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0221%4 Feb
anubis11–130.0222%4 Feb
mirage3–13-0.0221%2 Feb
mirage13–80.0920%2 Feb
ancient13–100.0722%1 Feb
stronghold11–13-0.0030%30 Jan
mirage13–20.0729%30 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0215%29 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0219%24 Jan
ancient3–130.0616%24 Jan
anubis3–13-0.0515%23 Jan
nuke2–13-0.0316%23 Jan
nuke13–100.0026%23 Jan
ancient13–60.0917%22 Jan
nuke13–80.0822%22 Jan
mirage13–11-0.0121%21 Jan
anubis7–13-0.049%19 Jan
ancient13–30.0222%18 Jan
anubis13–90.0412%17 Jan
anubis13–110.0427%16 Jan
anubis11–130.0028%16 Jan
inferno13–60.0413%15 Jan
dust25–130.0718%14 Jan
dust213–70.1728%14 Jan
anubis5–130.0833%10 Jan
train4–130.0124%6 Jan
nuke13–60.0618%4 Jan
vertigo9–3-0.0518%4 Jan
mirage16–130.0724%30 Dec
train13–90.0310%26 Dec
nuke13–80.0618%26 Dec
nuke13–70.1323%25 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →