BastaR

BastaR — CS2 Stats

76561198382276398[U:1:422010670]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,974Tracked matches67%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,495Top 50% of 201,197 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#72966 of 248170 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,499 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,495 +849 15 Aug – 2 Oct · 18 days played
18,37220,495peak 20,49515 Aug2 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,499 +0 31 Aug – 6 Sept · 3 observations
1,4991,499peak 1,49931 Aug6 Sept
20,495Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,499Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-08-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,499
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,495
  • +1,841 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,505 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBastaRFACEITLevel 7 · 1,499 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,495 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,499csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning58
Utility71

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateWWWWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +74ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility7.1
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.8
Utility7.1
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time583ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 21 Aug →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · cache, 15 Aug →
438msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · ancient, 15 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 30% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2112–957%-0.00
dust2D206–1430%-0.02
infernoS2013–765%0.00
cacheA117–464%-0.01
nukeA116–555%-0.00
anubisS96–367%0.01
mirageA74–357%-0.01
italy—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

447Matches
52%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
79.9ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210951%1.0014.6
Ancient9952%1.0215.3
Inferno9656%1.0615.1
Anubis5149%1.0816.1
Mirage3845%1.2414.7
Nuke3158%1.0515.9
Overpass1346%1.2616.3
Cache540%0.6911.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
587msReaction time
51.4%T opening success
39.4%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
9.69HE damage / grenade
9.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.4374% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–60.1322%2 Oct →
cache13–110.0725%2 Oct →
cache13–10.0032%2 Oct →
mirage13–70.0219%2 Oct →
nuke13–80.0115%22 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0318%22 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.058%21 Sept →
ancient8–130.0119%21 Sept →
anubis13–40.0111%21 Sept →
nuke6–130.0214%20 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0116%20 Sept →
cache13–50.0215%19 Sept →
nuke13–110.0014%19 Sept →
inferno13–110.0417%19 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.018%19 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0716%19 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0728%12 Sept →
ancient13–50.0518%12 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0029%12 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0122%11 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.024%11 Sept →
ancient13–90.0021%11 Sept →
dust25–130.0117%11 Sept →
anubis13–70.029%11 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.1015%11 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0215%11 Sept →
inferno13–110.0715%8 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0416%8 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0418%7 Sept →
mirage9–130.0125%7 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0114%4 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0619%3 Sept →
inferno13–50.0311%3 Sept →
anubis13–50.1217%3 Sept →
cache13–90.0217%3 Sept →
ancient13–80.069%3 Sept →
nuke13–80.0310%2 Sept →
ancient13–60.1217%2 Sept →
cache11–130.0110%1 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.037%1 Sept →
anubis13–70.0614%1 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.068%1 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0613%1 Sept →
nuke5–130.0521%31 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0318%31 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0118%31 Aug →
mirage13–90.0227%31 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0013%31 Aug →
inferno13–90.0010%31 Aug →
anubis13–90.0014%30 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0611%30 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0012%30 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.059%30 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0610%30 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0111%30 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0117%28 Aug →
cache13–70.0217%28 Aug →
nuke13–160.0115%28 Aug →
dust213–16-0.039%27 Aug →
dust213–100.0318%27 Aug →
italy3–13-0.0332%27 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0218%26 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0517%26 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0219%26 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.048%26 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0419%26 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0313%26 Aug →
ancient13–70.0220%24 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0624%24 Aug →
dust25–130.0221%23 Aug →
dust219–15-0.0117%23 Aug →
inferno13–100.0119%22 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0119%22 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0418%22 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.019%21 Aug →
anubis13–40.0514%21 Aug →
dust216–19-0.0210%21 Aug →
dust213–90.0015%21 Aug →
inferno13–70.1511%21 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.047%21 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0812%20 Aug →
dust215–150.0115%20 Aug →
dust28–13-0.1019%19 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0913%19 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.059%18 Aug →
dust211–130.0211%18 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0717%18 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0815%16 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0415%16 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0120%16 Aug →
ancient13–110.0114%15 Aug →
ancient14–160.0219%15 Aug →
cache13–40.029%15 Aug →
inferno13–50.056%15 Aug →
cache3–13-0.129%15 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0618%15 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0536%15 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0414%15 Aug →
inferno13–70.1317%15 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0417%15 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.