[ Why You Buy ]

[ Why You Buy ] — CS2 Stats

DK76561198381306497[U:1:421040769]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,093Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating13,024Blue band · top ~38.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,100 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (30 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,024 +678 2 Sept – 8 Oct · 12 days played
11,88713,024peak 13,0242 Sept8 Oct
13,038Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,100Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,100
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 101 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-07
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-07

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 13,024
  • +791 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,976 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[ Why You Buy ]FACEITLevel 5 · 1,100 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,024 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,100csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning48
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateLLLWWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility5.6
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 54% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.8
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time579ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy10.6%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 10.7% → last ⅓ avg 10.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–11 · nuke, 9 Sept →
23%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · nuke, 9 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 13 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 30 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB3418–1653%-0.03
nukeA2817–1161%-0.03
infernoD174–1324%-0.04
cacheA85–363%-0.02
vertigoA53–260%0.01
dust2—42–250%-0.03
train—11–0100%-0.05
anubis—10–10%-0.06
overpass—10–10%-0.31
mirage—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,180Matches
50%Win rate
0.79Avg K/D
62.1ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient23048%0.7111.5
Nuke19069%0.7511.6
Inferno13047%0.7511.9
Anubis6333%0.599.8
Overpass6161%0.7811.8
Vertigo5946%0.7712.8
Train3749%0.7512.9
Dust23529%0.649.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.3%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
72.4%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
576msReaction time
54.0%T opening success
36.1%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
11.07HE damage / grenade
5.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.2621% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.0909% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–130.0214%6 Nov →
nuke7–13-0.0115%6 Nov →
ancient9–13-0.0211%5 Nov →
train13–3-0.0512%5 Nov →
cache13–110.0319%3 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.070%3 Nov →
ancient5–13-0.036%3 Nov →
nuke13–11-0.0316%3 Nov →
inferno5–13-0.0716%2 Nov →
nuke13–3-0.0111%2 Nov →
ancient13–50.003%2 Nov →
cache11–13-0.028%2 Nov →
vertigo13–100.0310%31 Oct →
nuke13–60.0011%31 Oct →
ancient13–2-0.0613%30 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.089%29 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0418%28 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0713%27 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.058%27 Oct →
nuke16–13-0.0313%17 Oct →
vertigo10–13-0.0316%17 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.098%16 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.077%16 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0312%16 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.035%16 Oct →
vertigo13–90.0516%16 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0313%14 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0313%14 Oct →
ancient17–19-0.086%14 Oct →
ancient19–17-0.0214%13 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.062%13 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.066%11 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.084%11 Oct →
ancient13–5-0.016%10 Oct →
ancient11–130.0213%10 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.059%10 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.055%10 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0023%9 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0113%9 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0219%9 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0310%9 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0218%8 Oct →
nuke19–17-0.0514%5 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0711%5 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0318%5 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0813%5 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.068%5 Oct →
ancient19–15-0.0013%4 Oct →
inferno19–16-0.036%4 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.089%4 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0313%4 Oct →
nuke19–15-0.0210%1 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0618%1 Oct →
ancient15–19-0.0312%30 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.118%29 Sept →
cache9–13-0.087%29 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.049%29 Sept →
ancient10–130.0113%27 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0610%27 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0012%26 Sept →
ancient13–80.0117%26 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0013%26 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0116%26 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0019%22 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.072%22 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0410%22 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.025%21 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0810%21 Sept →
inferno13–90.009%21 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0413%18 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0113%17 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0516%17 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.072%17 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.097%15 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0115%15 Sept →
vertigo4–13-0.014%14 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0310%14 Sept →
overpass0–9-0.316%14 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.060%13 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.019%13 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0018%13 Sept →
nuke4–130.0116%13 Sept →
ancient16–140.0214%11 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0211%11 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.055%11 Sept →
mirage13–80.0415%11 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0114%10 Sept →
ancient13–40.022%10 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0411%10 Sept →
ancient13–110.0111%10 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0410%9 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0312%9 Sept →
nuke13–110.099%9 Sept →
dust213–2-0.019%8 Sept →
inferno7–130.0310%8 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0815%6 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0218%5 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0711%5 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0113%5 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0116%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.