π’₯π“Šπ“π‘’π“

π’₯π“Šπ“π‘’π“ β€” CS2 Stats

DK76561198379788830[U:1:419523102]Steam profile β†—βœ“ No bans

672Tracked matches45%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.7 Learning
Premier CS Rating4,944Grey band Β· top ~79% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#45717 of 59575 tracked
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGπ’₯π“Šπ“π‘’π“PREMIER4,944 Β· Grey bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere β€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning40
Utility10

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY36–59–5Last 10036%Win rateWWTWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate Β· +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8
Aggression6.4
Utility1.0
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.7

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates β€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions β€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison β†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game β€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start β€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers β€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning4.0
Utility1.0
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (Γ—0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03βˆ’0.00
first β…“ avg -0.03 β†’ last β…“ avg -0.03
Reaction time594msβˆ’80ms
first β…“ avg 674ms β†’ last β…“ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%+3.3%
first β…“ avg 13.8% β†’ last β…“ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating β€” inferno 13–1
13–1Biggest win β€” inferno
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≀2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map Β· 47% over 19anubisWeakest map Β· 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD227–1532%-0.01
nukeB199–1047%-0.02
ancientC177–1041%-0.01
infernoC167–944%-0.04
dust2C104–640%-0.03
anubisD61–517%-0.03
cacheD51–420%-0.04
vertigoβ€”20–20%-0.05
overpassβ€”10–10%-0.01
poseidonβ€”10–10%-0.14
officeβ€”10–10%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches β€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.1%Spray accuracy
76.9%Counter-strafing
8.4Β°Preaim
590msReaction time
36.8%T opening success
36.8%CT opening success
0.21Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
5.88HE damage / grenade
0.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag β€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2126 β€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups β†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.8364% β€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics β€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games β€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy β†’Anubis grenade lineups β†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–7-0.0119%30 Aug β†’
anubis13–11-0.0518%30 Aug β†’
ancient15–15-0.0613%30 Aug β†’
nuke13–60.0321%30 Aug β†’
inferno13–90.0116%30 Aug β†’
dust213–90.0019%30 Aug β†’
ancient6–13-0.079%29 Aug β†’
nuke13–10-0.0125%29 Aug β†’
mirage9–13-0.0313%29 Aug β†’
mirage7–13-0.039%29 Aug β†’
inferno9–4-0.0812%27 Aug β†’
vertigo8–8-0.1022%27 Aug β†’
ancient6–13-0.0121%26 Aug β†’
overpass11–13-0.0127%26 Aug β†’
cache7–13-0.0515%26 Aug β†’
inferno13–8-0.046%25 Aug β†’
inferno16–13-0.0119%25 Aug β†’
anubis8–13-0.0827%23 Aug β†’
ancient6–13-0.0220%22 Aug β†’
dust22–13-0.0320%22 Aug β†’
inferno10–13-0.1110%22 Aug β†’
inferno7–13-0.075%22 Aug β†’
dust29–13-0.0215%18 Aug β†’
nuke13–11-0.0620%18 Aug β†’
inferno3–13-0.0133%18 Aug β†’
ancient13–3-0.0116%17 Aug β†’
cache16–14-0.0415%17 Aug β†’
mirage8–13-0.0420%15 Aug β†’
mirage9–130.0417%14 Aug β†’
ancient3–13-0.0925%14 Aug β†’
mirage13–110.0312%13 Aug β†’
mirage13–11-0.0119%13 Aug β†’
mirage5–13-0.079%13 Aug β†’
nuke1–13-0.083%12 Aug β†’
vertigo2–13-0.0119%12 Aug β†’
ancient9–13-0.0524%12 Aug β†’
inferno13–10.0814%12 Aug β†’
inferno2–9-0.1820%12 Aug β†’
poseidon4–9-0.1421%12 Aug β†’
nuke13–90.0314%11 Aug β†’
nuke11–13-0.0822%11 Aug β†’
ancient13–50.0315%11 Aug β†’
ancient13–50.0517%10 Aug β†’
nuke10–130.0419%10 Aug β†’
ancient11–130.0124%9 Aug β†’
ancient13–20.0820%9 Aug β†’
ancient13–10.0716%9 Aug β†’
nuke13–9-0.0112%9 Aug β†’
mirage13–90.0418%9 Aug β†’
mirage9–130.0425%6 Aug β†’
nuke1–13-0.107%6 Aug β†’
ancient13–7-0.0119%6 Aug β†’
nuke13–9-0.027%5 Aug β†’
cache8–13-0.0513%5 Aug β†’
ancient15–15-0.0214%4 Aug β†’
nuke4–13-0.0521%4 Aug β†’
ancient9–13-0.0313%2 Aug β†’
nuke8–13-0.0116%2 Aug β†’
ancient13–11-0.039%31 Jul β†’
mirage13–4-0.023%30 Jul β†’
cache12–120.0215%30 Jul β†’
mirage11–13-0.0313%29 Jul β†’
mirage13–90.0512%29 Jul β†’
inferno13–7-0.086%28 Jul β†’
anubis10–130.0214%28 Jul β†’
inferno11–13-0.1115%27 Jul β†’
nuke9–130.0320%27 Jul β†’
anubis5–130.0117%27 Jul β†’
dust215–15-0.0315%26 Jul β†’
anubis7–13-0.077%26 Jul β†’
anubis6–13-0.0411%26 Jul β†’
mirage4–13-0.0410%26 Jul β†’
cache5–13-0.0811%26 Jul β†’
inferno4–13-0.0419%25 Jul β†’
inferno6–130.0615%25 Jul β†’
nuke13–110.0214%25 Jul β†’
mirage2–13-0.077%24 Jul β†’
inferno6–13-0.0618%24 Jul β†’
office11–130.0213%23 Jul β†’
nuke13–8-0.019%23 Jul β†’
mirage13–100.0623%23 Jul β†’
inferno10–13-0.0516%18 Jul β†’
ancient5–13-0.080%18 Jul β†’
mirage2–13-0.0423%17 Jul β†’
nuke6–130.0119%17 Jul β†’
mirage5–13-0.0515%17 Jul β†’
dust211–13-0.0811%17 Jul β†’
mirage0–13-0.0511%17 Jul β†’
nuke9–13-0.0315%17 Jul β†’
mirage13–20.066%16 Jul β†’
mirage4–13-0.0313%16 Jul β†’
nuke16–13-0.0017%16 Jul β†’
inferno13–9-0.038%16 Jul β†’
mirage4–13-0.0515%16 Jul β†’
dust213–6-0.0315%15 Jul β†’
mirage5–13-0.0917%14 Jul β†’
nuke9–13-0.0614%13 Jul β†’
dust213–60.0014%13 Jul β†’
dust24–13-0.0622%12 Jul β†’
dust29–13-0.0718%12 Jul β†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone β†’Inventory value for this account β†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers β†’