Frnz

Frnz — CS2 Stats

NO76561198379339669[U:1:419073941]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,443Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,910 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,443 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 29 Jan 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,910 +0 13 Sept22 Sept · 3 observations
1,9101,910peak 1,91013 Sept22 Sept
12,580Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,910Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2024-01-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,910
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 91 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFrnzFACEITLevel 9 · 1,910 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,910csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning54
Utility6

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57412Last 10057%Win rateLTLLWWWLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 10

  • 442 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility0.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch1.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.4
Utility0.6
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time570ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 7 Mar
40%Best headshot accuracy · 9–7 · vertigo, 17 Jun
328msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 16 Jun
13–3Biggest win · vertigo, 10 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
1112In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 77% over 22mirageWeakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB30161453%-0.01
ancientA2516964%-0.00
vertigoS2217577%0.01
mirageD1431121%-0.02
inferno31233%-0.03
train32167%0.04
overpass21150%0.03
nuke110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

930Matches
52%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
77.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis7753%1.0715.1
Ancient6958%1.0314.2
Vertigo5265%1.0516.0
Mirage4840%0.9415.6
Overpass617%0.9413.8
Inferno425%0.558.5
Nuke367%1.0912.7
Dust2250%0.8015.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
82.2%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
563msReaction time
38.3%T opening success
36.4%CT opening success
0.30Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
6.60HE damage / grenade
3.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2982 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.2932% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno2–6-0.0612%15 Aug
mirage12–120.0020%26 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0119%12 Feb
ancient10–130.0214%2 Nov
vertigo13–70.0715%14 Jun
inferno13–110.0422%19 Apr
ancient13–90.0914%29 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0617%26 Nov
train12–120.0026%14 Nov
train13–80.0423%14 Nov
train13–60.0714%14 Nov
vertigo13–110.0018%5 Nov
anubis13–40.0124%16 Oct
ancient3–13-0.110%11 Oct
mirage16–14-0.0113%7 Oct
anubis11–13-0.0520%25 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0623%4 Sept
vertigo11–130.0823%4 Sept
ancient13–100.0619%2 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0727%19 Aug
nuke13–70.0120%10 Aug
ancient13–80.0918%10 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0119%9 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0325%2 Aug
vertigo9–7-0.0440%17 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0224%17 Jun
ancient10–130.0113%16 Jun
ancient13–60.0212%16 Jun
vertigo13–7-0.0214%16 Jun
anubis5–13-0.059%12 Jun
ancient8–130.0323%12 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0417%11 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0215%11 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0315%11 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0629%11 Jun
anubis6–13-0.088%11 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0211%10 Jun
anubis10–13-0.057%10 Jun
ancient13–60.0222%9 Jun
ancient13–6-0.048%9 Jun
anubis13–80.0014%9 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0015%8 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0518%8 Jun
anubis13–11-0.047%6 Jun
anubis13–90.0317%19 May
mirage3–13-0.0721%15 May
anubis14–16-0.009%7 May
anubis5–13-0.0119%6 May
anubis13–9-0.0315%3 May
mirage5–130.0121%3 May
vertigo7–90.0830%27 Apr
vertigo13–11-0.0320%10 Mar
overpass14–160.0223%10 Mar
vertigo13–30.0131%10 Mar
vertigo13–70.0522%10 Mar
anubis13–60.0227%10 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0813%10 Mar
vertigo13–80.0320%9 Mar
anubis13–90.0624%9 Mar
mirage9–130.0626%7 Mar
anubis13–40.1019%7 Mar
mirage13–50.0825%6 Mar
anubis19–160.0724%3 Mar
vertigo11–13-0.0222%2 Mar
anubis13–90.0322%2 Mar
vertigo9–13-0.0324%2 Mar
anubis4–13-0.099%25 Feb
vertigo13–8-0.0822%25 Feb
ancient13–90.0324%25 Feb
vertigo11–13-0.0618%25 Feb
vertigo13–11-0.0310%24 Feb
anubis13–100.0013%24 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0926%24 Feb
mirage13–16-0.0716%21 Feb
ancient10–130.0224%12 Feb
anubis16–130.0028%12 Feb
anubis22–20-0.0224%11 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0038%10 Feb
ancient13–60.0216%10 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0013%10 Feb
vertigo13–100.0635%10 Feb
ancient13–80.0132%10 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0124%10 Feb
vertigo13–90.0124%10 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0322%9 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0227%9 Feb
vertigo13–110.0829%9 Feb
overpass13–30.0530%9 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0512%4 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0919%4 Feb
anubis12–16-0.0325%3 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0217%3 Feb
vertigo13–60.0218%3 Feb
anubis13–40.0837%3 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0124%2 Feb
vertigo13–40.0324%2 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0419%31 Jan
vertigo16–12-0.0123%31 Jan
ancient13–80.049%29 Jan
vertigo13–40.0231%29 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →