baadio

baadio — CS2 Stats

76561198377751194[U:1:417485466]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,336Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,190Blue band · top ~32.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,190 +500 13 Jul – 10 Oct · 25 days played
12,26815,000peak 15,00013 Jul10 Oct
15,100Peak Premier in tracked matches
43Days played since 2026-07-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 810 below peak (15,000)
  • -810 over 30 days · declining
  • +500 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 810 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbaadioFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER14,190 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning50
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–51–1Last 10048%Win rateLWLWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −5.0pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility7.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.0
Utility7.4
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time568ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 15 Jul →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · dust2, 5 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 10 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 1 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC197–1237%0.02
dust2B168–850%0.02
infernoC167–944%0.01
anubisD134–931%-0.01
mirageS139–469%-0.02
cacheS128–467%0.00
ancientB115–645%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

894Matches
51%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
74.4ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15748%0.8112.4
Inferno12857%1.0013.6
Anubis9953%0.8813.1
Nuke8752%0.9713.2
Ancient6746%0.8311.7
Dust24652%0.8714.3
Vertigo3647%0.9314.2
Overpass2536%0.9014.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
31.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.9%Spray accuracy
75.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
566msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
56.6%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
13.79HE damage / grenade
20.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.2519% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–13-0.0118%10 Oct →
anubis13–110.0320%3 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0819%1 Oct →
cache13–0-0.0113%1 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0319%27 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0420%27 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0528%22 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0525%21 Sept →
dust219–220.0213%21 Sept →
dust213–100.0520%19 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0327%17 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0028%16 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0515%14 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0429%6 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0225%6 Sept →
ancient13–60.0626%6 Sept →
dust213–70.1225%6 Sept →
nuke13–00.0438%6 Sept →
ancient13–30.0018%6 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0415%5 Sept →
nuke13–60.0016%5 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0116%5 Sept →
cache10–130.0120%5 Sept →
dust213–70.0338%5 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0117%3 Sept →
ancient9–130.0218%3 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.063%3 Sept →
dust25–130.0114%3 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0225%2 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.017%2 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0016%31 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0711%27 Aug →
cache13–2-0.0421%26 Aug →
nuke8–130.0025%25 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0823%23 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0710%23 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0121%23 Aug →
anubis20–22-0.0317%23 Aug →
inferno13–90.0423%19 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0120%18 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0914%18 Aug →
mirage22–20-0.0421%17 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0215%17 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0110%17 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0921%16 Aug →
cache13–80.0117%15 Aug →
nuke13–50.0719%10 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0626%9 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0322%7 Aug →
mirage13–50.0327%3 Aug →
ancient13–80.0119%2 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0417%1 Aug →
dust213–70.1020%1 Aug →
dust29–130.0225%1 Aug →
inferno13–90.0113%1 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0122%1 Aug →
anubis13–110.0217%31 Jul →
nuke13–70.0618%31 Jul →
mirage16–140.0615%29 Jul →
mirage13–10.0732%28 Jul →
anubis10–130.0415%28 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0421%28 Jul →
inferno13–80.0615%28 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0624%28 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0013%28 Jul →
nuke9–130.0110%28 Jul →
ancient10–130.0213%27 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0513%27 Jul →
cache13–110.0913%27 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0415%27 Jul →
nuke6–130.0116%27 Jul →
nuke10–130.0114%26 Jul →
ancient10–130.0719%26 Jul →
anubis13–60.0012%26 Jul →
inferno11–130.0919%26 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0120%26 Jul →
mirage13–80.0118%26 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0023%25 Jul →
nuke13–80.0624%25 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0219%25 Jul →
inferno10–130.0827%25 Jul →
mirage13–50.0115%23 Jul →
cache13–30.0621%23 Jul →
dust213–80.0211%23 Jul →
anubis7–130.0316%23 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0019%23 Jul →
anubis7–13-0.0417%20 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0523%20 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0514%20 Jul →
nuke13–110.0933%20 Jul →
dust210–130.0128%19 Jul →
inferno13–60.1330%19 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0319%18 Jul →
dust21–13-0.0619%18 Jul →
dust213–80.0513%18 Jul →
cache13–40.0829%17 Jul →
inferno13–100.0813%15 Jul →
nuke13–70.1631%15 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0430%15 Jul →
inferno13–40.0933%13 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.