oneta P

oneta P — CS2 Stats

US76561198371620860[U:1:411355132]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

894Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,153Hours in CS58Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,051Purple band · top ~20.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,051 +69 14 Aug – 23 Oct · 20 days played
14,32917,686peak 17,68614 Aug23 Oct
17,686Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2026-08-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 635 below peak (17,686)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,949 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate45.9%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy10.1%12.7%13.0%2.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.151.051.06above
Match win rate51.1%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGoneta PFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,051 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning55
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–44–5Last 10051%Win rateLWLWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · +56ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.5
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time520ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 520ms
Headshot accuracy17.4%+0.5%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–4 · cache, 14 Sept →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · ancient, 20 Oct →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · dust2, 13 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 13 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
10–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 15mirageWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisS1711–665%-0.00
mirageD164–1225%-0.00
cacheA159–660%0.02
ancientC156–940%0.01
dust2S1511–473%0.03
nukeA117–464%0.01
infernoC83–538%0.01
office—30–30%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

56,612Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
2,810Matches
51.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
45.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
10.1%Shot accuracy
7,190MVPs
1,165Hours (in match)
2,474Bombs planted
678Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4714,230
AWP8,176
SSG 081,929
MAC-101,378
MP91,152
FAMAS1,089

Lifetime map wins

8,850office
7,011dust2
3,217inferno
1,246nuke
284vertigo
272train
92lake
66italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

229Matches
53%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
76.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4848%1.1515.3
Mirage4139%0.9915.0
Anubis3364%1.0014.8
Dust23060%1.1615.4
Nuke2556%0.9314.3
Cache2365%1.1916.0
Vertigo333%1.2521.3
Train1100%1.6922.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
34.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
526msReaction time
28.5%T opening success
46.1%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
6.8%Flash assists
10.73HE damage / grenade
14.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.4579% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2–13-0.054%30 Oct →
cache13–50.0513%29 Oct →
ancient11–130.0232%28 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0112%28 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.048%27 Oct →
anubis13–110.0517%25 Oct →
mirage9–130.0621%25 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0618%24 Oct →
dust213–110.0219%23 Oct →
anubis13–2-0.0118%23 Oct →
anubis13–10.0120%23 Oct →
office8–130.1125%23 Oct →
anubis13–50.0716%21 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0313%21 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0118%20 Oct →
ancient5–130.0740%20 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.1420%20 Oct →
anubis13–100.0114%19 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0212%16 Oct →
office10–13-0.0429%16 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.083%15 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0426%14 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0121%14 Oct →
anubis13–7-0.0014%14 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0213%13 Oct →
nuke13–70.0511%13 Oct →
inferno15–150.0018%13 Oct →
ancient13–20.0915%13 Oct →
nuke13–00.1421%13 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0710%9 Oct →
cache22–200.0319%8 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0611%8 Oct →
nuke13–40.0024%8 Oct →
mirage13–100.0315%6 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0513%6 Oct →
ancient13–10.0532%6 Oct →
anubis13–50.0811%3 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0228%3 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0136%3 Oct →
cache13–90.0721%2 Oct →
mirage8–130.0113%30 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0024%29 Sept →
ancient14–160.0019%27 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0222%25 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0119%25 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0618%24 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0116%24 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.048%24 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0713%24 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.039%22 Sept →
nuke10–130.0216%22 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0438%21 Sept →
dust213–90.1111%21 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.049%16 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0028%15 Sept →
mirage13–80.0825%15 Sept →
cache9–130.1017%14 Sept →
cache13–40.1821%14 Sept →
inferno8–80.0417%12 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0019%12 Sept →
inferno7–130.0525%11 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0727%9 Sept →
inferno13–60.0114%9 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0414%9 Sept →
dust213–100.0322%9 Sept →
dust216–140.0213%8 Sept →
cache15–150.0015%7 Sept →
ancient15–150.008%7 Sept →
ancient7–130.0320%7 Sept →
inferno13–110.0118%5 Sept →
anubis13–80.045%4 Sept →
dust213–50.1213%4 Sept →
dust213–100.0814%3 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0313%2 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0415%30 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0219%30 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0111%29 Aug →
anubis13–70.0822%29 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0519%28 Aug →
mirage14–160.0217%28 Aug →
cache4–130.0535%26 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.074%24 Aug →
dust213–90.0516%23 Aug →
inferno6–130.0510%22 Aug →
dust212–60.1233%22 Aug →
ancient10–130.0413%22 Aug →
dust213–60.0123%21 Aug →
nuke13–110.0323%21 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0217%21 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0216%21 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0115%16 Aug →
inferno16–120.0319%16 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0521%16 Aug →
cache9–130.0420%15 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0518%15 Aug →
office3–13-0.048%15 Aug →
ancient13–100.0213%14 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0420%14 Aug →
mirage13–70.0516%14 Aug →
nuke11–130.1123%14 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.