Fatholm

Fatholm — CS2 Stats

RU76561198369553875[U:1:409288147]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

470Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 470 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 3 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,389 -1,489 3 Feb1 Jul · 25 days played
21,93424,878peak 24,8783 Feb1 Jul
25,008Peak Premier in tracked matches
31Days played since 2026-02-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning56
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39547Last 10039%Win rateLLLWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · +39ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 612ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility3.6
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.9

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.6
Utility3.6
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time576ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 576ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 24 Mar
41%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · poseidon, 8 Feb
336msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 14 Mar
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 26 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 26overpassWeakest map · 20% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2617965%0.04
ancientD2251723%-0.00
infernoD1541127%-0.02
anubisC114736%0.02
overpassD102820%0.02
dust2D62433%-0.01
mirage42250%0.01
poseidon31233%-0.06
cache220100%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
573msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
54.3%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
10.34HE damage / grenade
3.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4611 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2456% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–13-0.0329%25 Jul
ancient2–130.0111%25 Jul
ancient1–13-0.074%1 Jul
nuke9–60.0213%23 Jun
inferno0–9-0.3029%23 Jun
nuke13–100.0323%23 Jun
nuke13–100.0919%11 Jun
ancient10–130.0113%19 May
anubis13–80.0919%19 May
cache13–80.0428%19 May
inferno11–13-0.0418%19 May
overpass13–110.0111%19 May
overpass11–13-0.0320%19 May
nuke8–130.008%19 May
overpass15–150.0316%19 May
overpass13–110.1219%19 May
dust210–130.058%19 May
mirage13–60.0518%19 May
mirage10–130.0214%18 May
overpass4–13-0.0619%18 May
inferno4–13-0.0326%18 May
nuke13–80.0618%18 May
cache13–10-0.0320%18 May
anubis13–80.1226%18 May
nuke13–50.0318%18 May
nuke13–90.0433%18 May
ancient16–130.0017%18 May
nuke13–80.0621%17 May
ancient13–30.0532%17 May
ancient9–130.0117%17 May
ancient5–13-0.0217%17 May
dust213–11-0.0121%17 May
inferno13–10-0.0017%17 May
nuke9–60.0718%18 Apr
inferno2–90.0521%18 Apr
nuke5–13-0.0327%6 Apr
nuke14–160.0422%24 Mar
nuke13–70.2029%24 Mar
nuke13–60.1427%22 Mar
nuke13–110.1234%19 Mar
overpass14–160.0415%18 Mar
nuke9–7-0.0022%14 Mar
nuke9–20.0732%14 Mar
inferno8–80.1319%14 Mar
inferno2–9-0.150%14 Mar
overpass7–130.0630%14 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0316%14 Mar
anubis13–40.0727%10 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0217%10 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0123%4 Mar
nuke11–130.0313%4 Mar
anubis3–13-0.1010%4 Mar
overpass8–130.0116%28 Feb
inferno1–9-0.1725%28 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0010%28 Feb
overpass11–13-0.0122%27 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0414%27 Feb
anubis13–60.1022%27 Feb
inferno13–90.0612%26 Feb
anubis9–130.0121%26 Feb
ancient13–60.0521%26 Feb
dust23–13-0.0624%26 Feb
poseidon4–9-0.150%26 Feb
ancient13–90.0213%26 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0118%26 Feb
dust213–20.0240%26 Feb
inferno13–100.0224%25 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0228%25 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0017%25 Feb
nuke6–1-0.080%22 Feb
ancient13–90.0520%18 Feb
nuke13–8-0.0419%15 Feb
nuke13–80.0721%15 Feb
nuke14–16-0.0327%15 Feb
inferno10–130.1524%13 Feb
ancient15–15-0.0016%12 Feb
ancient8–130.0620%12 Feb
nuke15–150.0320%12 Feb
anubis0–3-0.040%11 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0219%11 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0214%11 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0016%11 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0115%9 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0321%9 Feb
ancient9–130.0719%9 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0117%9 Feb
inferno8–80.0329%8 Feb
poseidon9–20.1641%8 Feb
poseidon0–9-0.1827%6 Feb
nuke8–8-0.063%6 Feb
inferno9–20.0233%6 Feb
vertigo8–8-0.032%6 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0528%6 Feb
nuke7–13-0.039%6 Feb
nuke13–50.1140%6 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0419%4 Feb
anubis6–130.0420%4 Feb
dust26–13-0.0515%3 Feb
inferno11–130.0117%3 Feb
ancient3–13-0.0717%3 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →