Nighty — CS2 Stats

AT76561198364302848[U:1:404037120]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,532Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating2,793Grey band · top ~88.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#207699 of 259372 tracked

WingmanGold Nova II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−1860Premier CS Rating · 4,653 → 2,793

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 2,793 -2,405 20 Sept – 1 Nov · 28 days played

6,251Peak Premier in tracked matches

30Days played since 2026-09-20

Premier CS Rating

3,458 below peak (6,251)
-3,307 over 30 days · declining
Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 2,207 to go
Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning59

Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–57–3Last 10040%Win rateWLWLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.5pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

2–3 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 33%
Avg reaction 466ms

Last 10

6–4 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 30%
Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

9–10–1 · 45% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 27%
Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.3

Utility6.2

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels5.1

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 66% on T to 47% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning5.9

Utility6.2

Mechanics3.7

Opening Duels6.6

Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time619ms−47ms

first ⅓ avg 666ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms

Headshot accuracy27.5%+0.2%

first ⅓ avg 27.2% → last ⅓ avg 27.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 10–13 · ancient, 1 Nov →

47%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 10 Oct →

414msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · office, 1 Nov →

13–3Biggest win · ancient, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak

5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 7nukeWeakest map · 26% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	22	11–11	50%	-0.03
nuke	D	19	5–14	26%	0.01
mirage	D	17	5–12	29%	-0.01
dust2	B	16	8–8	50%	0.00
ancient	C	10	4–6	40%	0.03
cache	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.00
anubis	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.01
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3Matches

33%Win rate

0.51Avg K/D

46.4ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	1	0%	0.53	9.0
Mirage	1	100%	0.69	11.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.32	6.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.0%Headshot accuracy

32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.8%Spray accuracy

66.7%Counter-strafing

10.0°Preaim

622msReaction time

66.1%T opening success

46.5%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

4.8%Flash assists

11.19HE damage / grenade

14.86Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–7	0.02	26%	1 Nov →
ancient	10–13	0.13	23%	1 Nov →
mirage	13–10	0.04	45%	1 Nov →
office	3–13	-0.04	40%	1 Nov →
inferno	7–13	0.04	30%	31 Oct →
inferno	13–11	-0.08	35%	24 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.01	27%	24 Oct →
inferno	3–13	-0.06	18%	24 Oct →
ancient	13–3	0.04	24%	24 Oct →
inferno	13–9	0.01	29%	24 Oct →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	39%	24 Oct →
nuke	13–7	-0.05	41%	24 Oct →
ancient	1–13	-0.06	22%	24 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	29%	24 Oct →
inferno	16–12	0.10	20%	23 Oct →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	12%	23 Oct →
dust2	14–16	0.06	25%	23 Oct →
inferno	13–5	-0.00	27%	23 Oct →
mirage	9–13	0.03	12%	22 Oct →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	26%	22 Oct →
nuke	16–12	0.00	34%	21 Oct →
dust2	13–5	0.07	23%	21 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.03	23%	21 Oct →
cache	13–9	-0.05	32%	21 Oct →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	27%	21 Oct →
dust2	8–13	0.04	26%	20 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.07	43%	20 Oct →
mirage	10–13	-0.09	22%	20 Oct →
dust2	13–10	0.03	19%	20 Oct →
cache	13–11	0.05	38%	20 Oct →
nuke	13–7	0.09	26%	18 Oct →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	17%	18 Oct →
dust2	13–4	-0.08	29%	18 Oct →
ancient	4–13	0.03	26%	17 Oct →
ancient	13–5	0.10	31%	17 Oct →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	24%	17 Oct →
anubis	11–13	0.05	33%	17 Oct →
ancient	3–13	-0.07	36%	16 Oct →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	22%	14 Oct →
inferno	13–5	0.03	19%	14 Oct →
nuke	11–13	0.02	34%	14 Oct →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	3%	13 Oct →
inferno	2–9	-0.14	15%	13 Oct →
inferno	2–9	-0.18	19%	13 Oct →
inferno	4–9	-0.12	32%	13 Oct →
inferno	3–9	-0.12	27%	13 Oct →
inferno	11–13	-0.08	18%	12 Oct →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	30%	12 Oct →
inferno	13–9	0.01	21%	11 Oct →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	27%	10 Oct →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	47%	10 Oct →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	17%	10 Oct →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	30%	9 Oct →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	25%	6 Oct →
anubis	13–7	-0.00	16%	6 Oct →
nuke	10–13	0.02	21%	6 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.00	36%	6 Oct →
ancient	13–4	0.02	17%	5 Oct →
nuke	9–13	0.01	32%	5 Oct →
cache	13–11	-0.01	15%	4 Oct →
ancient	8–13	0.07	24%	4 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	15%	4 Oct →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	32%	4 Oct →
dust2	1–13	-0.03	18%	4 Oct →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	23%	4 Oct →
cache	4–13	-0.03	28%	4 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.03	33%	3 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.04	34%	3 Oct →
mirage	13–5	0.01	31%	1 Oct →
inferno	13–6	0.00	31%	1 Oct →
nuke	8–13	0.01	25%	1 Oct →
inferno	6–13	0.02	29%	30 Sept →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	33%	30 Sept →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	47%	30 Sept →
mirage	0–13	-0.07	21%	30 Sept →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	25%	30 Sept →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	18%	29 Sept →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	28%	29 Sept →
nuke	13–7	0.03	47%	28 Sept →
cache	13–4	-0.00	32%	28 Sept →
mirage	3–13	-0.04	23%	27 Sept →
inferno	13–8	0.07	23%	27 Sept →
inferno	13–10	-0.05	22%	27 Sept →
cache	12–16	-0.04	20%	27 Sept →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	13%	27 Sept →
poseidon	3–9	-0.10	33%	27 Sept →
ancient	13–7	0.04	23%	27 Sept →
cache	9–13	0.06	29%	26 Sept →
vertigo	8–13	0.05	15%	26 Sept →
mirage	4–13	0.04	36%	26 Sept →
mirage	15–15	0.03	28%	26 Sept →
mirage	13–4	-0.05	7%	26 Sept →
nuke	13–16	0.02	35%	25 Sept →
dust2	8–6	0.03	11%	25 Sept →
nuke	6–13	0.06	32%	24 Sept →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	29%	24 Sept →
nuke	8–12	0.09	24%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.03	29%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–11	0.01	38%	23 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.06	29%	20 Sept →