popi

popi — CS2 Stats

FI76561198363027201[U:1:402761473]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,250Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,743Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,373Blue band · top ~31.7% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,250 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 28 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,373 -738 19 Mar10 Sept · 11 days played
14,37315,111peak 15,11119 Mar10 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,078 +0 30 Aug10 Sept · 4 observations
2,0782,078peak 2,07830 Aug10 Sept
15,111Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,078Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
56Days played since 2026-01-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,078
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 422 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 738 below peak (15,111)
  • 0 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 627 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

No matches recorded between 11 Sep 2026 and 20 Sep 2026.

Measured 11 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=20,242), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerBlue band medianPurple band medianvs Purple band
Headshot rate56.2%41.9%44.3%above
Shot accuracy8.4%9.6%11.8%3.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.900.981.030.13 short
Match win rate43.4%43.8%45.2%1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Purple band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Purple band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpopiPREMIER14,373 · Blue bandPEAK ELO2,078csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning46
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53461Last 10053%Win rateLLLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · −6ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 662ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 672ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 675ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility2.9
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 648ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning4.6
Utility2.9
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time659ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 683ms → last ⅓ avg 659ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 12 Jun
53%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 19 Mar
469msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · ancient, 23 Apr
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 14 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1911In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 78% over 9ancientWeakest map · 42% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeB2091145%-0.01
ancientC1981142%-0.01
mirageB189950%-0.00
anubisB115645%0.01
overpassS107370%0.02
infernoS97278%0.06
vertigoA53260%0.02
poseidon41325%0.00
dust2330100%0.04
cache110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,180Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
2,784Matches
43.4%Match win rate
56.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of Blue band
8.4%Shot accuracy
8,388MVPs
1,743Hours (in match)
1,991Bombs planted
1,527Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,168
AWP4,827
MP91,536
SSG 081,114
Knife952

Lifetime map wins

4,898nuke
3,868inferno
2,268dust2
1,630vertigo
1,298train
224lake
139cbble
32office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

895Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
77.8ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20849%1.0315.7
Ancient17549%1.0415.6
Nuke13556%1.0415.5
Anubis9744%1.0615.9
Inferno7144%1.0715.3
Dust25358%1.1417.1
Overpass3165%1.0417.3
Vertigo2544%0.8914.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy
31.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.1%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
648msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
35.8%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
9.10HE damage / grenade
2.49Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4641 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7555% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–130.0024%11 Aug
vertigo5–90.0326%2 Jul
poseidon3–9-0.186%16 Jun
overpass9–10.1530%16 Jun
nuke5–9-0.1322%16 Jun
anubis3–130.0242%13 Jun
dust213–80.0530%12 Jun
vertigo9–50.0822%12 Jun
poseidon6–9-0.0521%12 Jun
inferno9–10.2924%12 Jun
ancient11–130.0216%12 Jun
inferno9–70.1327%11 Jun
mirage8–130.0423%10 Jun
dust213–100.0628%10 Jun
nuke9–70.0716%26 May
vertigo8–8-0.0844%25 May
poseidon9–40.2224%25 May
vertigo9–5-0.0026%25 May
inferno9–5-0.0026%25 May
nuke1–9-0.1918%25 May
vertigo9–40.0930%25 May
nuke4–13-0.0220%23 May
ancient16–12-0.0113%20 May
mirage13–70.0026%19 May
nuke11–130.0725%11 May
inferno13–110.0132%6 May
overpass11–130.0016%6 May
mirage7–13-0.0318%30 Apr
ancient9–130.0428%29 Apr
dust219–170.0233%28 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0424%27 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0119%27 Apr
nuke13–110.0420%25 Apr
anubis11–130.0828%25 Apr
ancient2–13-0.0133%23 Apr
inferno8–130.0327%23 Apr
ancient10–130.0033%22 Apr
cache13–60.0235%22 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0123%22 Apr
nuke14–16-0.0726%22 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0529%19 Apr
inferno4–130.0338%19 Apr
nuke2–13-0.0026%18 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0020%17 Apr
mirage13–110.0127%16 Apr
nuke13–80.0321%15 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0124%13 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0417%13 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0320%13 Apr
mirage11–130.0131%30 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0732%29 Mar
inferno13–11-0.0131%27 Mar
nuke13–60.0237%26 Mar
anubis13–110.0124%26 Mar
nuke13–70.0431%25 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0518%25 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0126%24 Mar
overpass13–40.0723%19 Mar
ancient10–20.0152%19 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0127%19 Mar
ancient10–30.0029%19 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0053%19 Mar
ancient6–130.0727%18 Mar
nuke13–50.1231%18 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0432%17 Mar
inferno16–140.0722%17 Mar
overpass13–100.0323%16 Mar
mirage16–120.0122%14 Mar
anubis13–00.0750%14 Mar
overpass13–110.0425%11 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0517%11 Mar
ancient16–14-0.0226%11 Mar
ancient3–13-0.0419%25 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0530%20 Feb
overpass7–13-0.0115%20 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0029%18 Feb
nuke10–130.0134%18 Feb
inferno16–130.0220%17 Feb
ancient3–130.0622%17 Feb
nuke1–13-0.0928%16 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0516%15 Feb
nuke13–110.0127%15 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0327%15 Feb
anubis13–110.0423%13 Feb
ancient13–70.0029%13 Feb
poseidon6–90.0329%13 Feb
mirage10–130.0821%12 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0613%12 Feb
overpass13–11-0.0515%11 Feb
nuke7–130.0028%9 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0313%9 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0121%7 Feb
nuke19–17-0.0114%3 Feb
ancient13–80.0019%3 Feb
anubis13–110.0524%3 Feb
overpass22–20-0.0119%2 Feb
mirage14–160.0627%1 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0417%31 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0420%29 Jan
nuke14–16-0.0434%28 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →