mtths'

mtths' — CS2 Stats

DE76561198353708260[U:1:393442532]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,750Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,927Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#64259 of 232649 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,590 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 28 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,927 +804 9 Aug14 Sept · 7 days played
20,12321,203peak 21,2039 Aug14 Sept
21,203Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,590Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-02-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,590
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 161 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 276 below peak (21,203)
  • -111 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,073 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmtths'FACEITLevel 9 · 1,590 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER20,927 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,590csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning59
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55423Last 10055%Win rateWWWWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility5.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time585ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%−3.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 9–1 · vertigo, 14 Apr
40%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · dust2, 1 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 8 Aug
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 17 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W5Current streak
176In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 30infernoWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS30201067%0.04
dust2A25141156%0.02
infernoC1771041%-0.00
ancientB147750%0.03
anubisA74357%-0.01
nuke3030%0.02
cache21150%-0.02
vertigo110100%0.15
poseidon110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

457Matches
52%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
91.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage14050%1.4719.4
Dust211253%1.2817.6
Ancient8054%1.3319.7
Inferno4757%1.2817.3
Anubis4657%1.2017.3
Nuke1414%1.0916.6
Cache888%1.5123.4
Overpass333%0.9914.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
571msReaction time
38.9%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
11.96HE damage / grenade
10.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.9071% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–11-0.0215%17 Sept
dust213–11-0.039%17 Sept
mirage13–110.0221%17 Sept
dust213–6-0.023%14 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0320%14 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0518%14 Sept
anubis13–110.0118%14 Sept
anubis13–160.028%13 Sept
inferno13–80.0122%10 Sept
mirage16–190.0715%10 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0030%10 Sept
dust213–90.0219%10 Sept
ancient13–40.0712%9 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0111%9 Sept
mirage11–130.0214%9 Sept
dust211–130.0415%9 Sept
dust213–90.0413%8 Sept
inferno6–13-0.085%7 Sept
nuke15–150.1023%2 Sept
dust211–130.0725%2 Sept
dust213–100.0740%1 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0611%24 Aug
mirage13–110.0816%11 Aug
mirage13–110.017%10 Aug
mirage13–110.0211%9 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0316%9 Aug
mirage13–100.0020%9 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0317%9 Aug
dust28–13-0.0120%8 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0110%8 Aug
dust213–10-0.0217%8 Aug
anubis13–110.0415%4 Aug
ancient13–90.0811%4 Aug
dust213–60.0617%4 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0219%30 Jul
mirage13–80.0822%27 Jul
inferno13–70.0510%26 Jul
mirage9–130.0924%23 Jul
dust27–130.1123%20 Jul
inferno6–130.0538%20 Jul
mirage13–100.0221%16 Jul
dust213–110.0623%13 Jul
dust212–120.0834%13 Jul
inferno13–60.0325%8 Jul
cache6–13-0.0610%8 Jul
inferno9–130.0018%6 Jul
ancient13–50.0810%6 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0216%6 Jul
dust213–60.0022%28 Jun
anubis3–13-0.098%28 Jun
inferno7–130.019%28 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0031%28 Jun
dust213–11-0.0115%28 Jun
dust210–13-0.0322%28 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0017%28 Jun
dust213–16-0.0323%27 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0032%25 Jun
ancient10–13-0.076%25 Jun
dust25–130.0224%21 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0017%20 Jun
dust213–100.0414%18 Jun
mirage13–110.0712%18 Jun
mirage13–40.1026%18 Jun
inferno13–20.1024%17 Jun
mirage13–70.0734%15 Jun
mirage11–130.0221%9 Jun
ancient13–70.089%7 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0617%7 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0310%6 Jun
inferno12–160.0615%1 Jun
inferno2–9-0.2224%25 May
dust213–60.0520%17 May
ancient12–120.1322%17 May
mirage13–110.0627%17 May
inferno13–90.1119%16 May
mirage13–90.0819%16 May
nuke5–13-0.0818%6 May
dust28–13-0.0312%3 May
mirage13–100.0217%2 May
inferno13–11-0.016%29 Apr
cache16–140.0218%29 Apr
mirage13–50.0511%27 Apr
dust29–130.0913%20 Apr
mirage4–00.1429%20 Apr
dust216–14-0.0413%18 Apr
mirage13–60.0715%14 Apr
dust29–130.0235%14 Apr
mirage6–130.1134%14 Apr
vertigo9–10.1515%14 Apr
dust213–9-0.0215%12 Apr
ancient13–160.0313%5 Apr
mirage16–140.0114%31 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0223%8 Mar
inferno7–9-0.0310%28 Feb
ancient13–60.0420%28 Feb
ancient13–80.0322%28 Feb
nuke10–130.0425%28 Feb
ancient16–120.0329%28 Feb
mirage13–60.0825%28 Feb
poseidon9–70.1031%28 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →