damn, that's brutal :0

damn, that's brutal :0 — CS2 Stats

IM76561198350042384[U:1:389776656]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,194Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,138Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,720Top 10% of 215,248 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15865 of 261492 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Oct 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,720 -214 31 Jul – 31 Oct · 16 days played
23,99926,377peak 26,37731 Jul31 Oct
26,377Peak Premier in tracked matches
45Days played since 2026-07-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 657 below peak (26,377)
  • +1,082 over 30 days · improving
  • -422 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,280 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate51.1%48.2%50.9%meets
Shot accuracy10.8%13.2%13.7%2.9% short
Kill/death ratio1.051.071.090.04 short
Match win rate47.5%46.9%48.4%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdamn, that's brutal :0FACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,720 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning56
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61–31–8Last 10061%Win rateWLWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +8.2pp headshot accuracy · +71ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning5.6
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time497ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 497ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.37Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 12 Jul →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · inferno, 12 Jul →
297msFastest reaction time · 7–9 · vertigo, 15 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 15 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 79% over 14dust2Weakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2517–868%0.03
dust2C177–1041%-0.01
nukeS1411–379%0.10
infernoB137–654%0.05
cacheA85–363%0.02
vertigoB84–450%0.05
ancientS64–267%0.02
anubis—31–233%-0.02
overpass—32–167%0.01
office—22–0100%0.01
debris—11–0100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

116,552Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
4,341Matches
47.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
51.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
10.8%Shot accuracy
13,297MVPs
2,599Hours (in match)
5,116Bombs planted
2,079Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4749,638
AWP12,825
MP72,457
MP91,789
MAC-101,717

Lifetime map wins

5,921dust2
3,761inferno
2,211nuke
1,495train
712vertigo
458cbble
436lake
368office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

587Matches
54%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
81.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12852%1.2016.5
Ancient6357%1.2017.6
Dust25157%1.1916.9
Anubis3656%1.3018.5
Nuke2658%1.1517.7
Inferno2552%1.1416.5
Overpass1338%1.0715.7
Cache475%1.1418.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.7%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
82.3%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
509msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
32.4%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
8.70HE damage / grenade
4.52Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5138% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–80.0219%31 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.1015%31 Oct →
nuke13–20.1135%31 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0519%31 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0416%31 Oct →
anubis13–80.0318%30 Oct →
cache13–50.0218%30 Oct →
mirage13–60.0318%29 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0332%28 Oct →
inferno13–80.0522%22 Oct →
ancient11–130.0318%21 Oct →
nuke9–70.0113%7 Oct →
mirage13–70.0512%7 Oct →
nuke9–10.2018%6 Oct →
vertigo8–80.0813%6 Oct →
overpass2–9-0.1810%5 Oct →
nuke9–4-0.0317%5 Oct →
vertigo9–5-0.0122%5 Oct →
overpass9–4-0.077%5 Oct →
cache0–40.000%30 Sept →
inferno7–90.269%23 Sept →
dust213–90.0117%20 Sept →
inferno9–1-0.0633%15 Sept →
vertigo7–9-0.0530%15 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0113%10 Sept →
mirage13–100.1214%7 Sept →
mirage22–200.0113%6 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0335%6 Sept →
vertigo9–70.1927%6 Sept →
vertigo8–80.0022%6 Sept →
overpass9–10.2822%6 Sept →
nuke9–30.2626%6 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.0713%6 Sept →
inferno8–80.0511%6 Sept →
nuke9–10.1241%5 Sept →
office13–10-0.0227%5 Sept →
vertigo9–30.2125%3 Sept →
mirage8–10.2636%3 Sept →
office13–110.0513%3 Sept →
nuke9–60.1816%3 Sept →
nuke9–50.037%3 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.004%3 Sept →
mirage13–60.1122%1 Sept →
ancient13–100.0730%1 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0413%25 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0518%25 Aug →
dust20–130.0123%24 Aug →
cache13–80.0610%23 Aug →
mirage13–40.0527%23 Aug →
dust213–9-0.0124%23 Aug →
mirage13–60.0310%22 Aug →
nuke6–90.0328%20 Aug →
dust212–120.0119%17 Aug →
dust213–80.0114%16 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.097%16 Aug →
dust213–100.0229%15 Aug →
inferno13–100.0222%8 Aug →
mirage13–90.0111%7 Aug →
mirage13–80.0516%6 Aug →
dust216–13-0.0615%5 Aug →
dust213–70.0322%5 Aug →
mirage9–130.0118%4 Aug →
cache6–13-0.049%3 Aug →
dust28–130.0211%3 Aug →
nuke8–80.065%3 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0013%2 Aug →
nuke8–8-0.028%1 Aug →
vertigo9–50.0711%1 Aug →
nuke13–70.0513%1 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0210%1 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0424%1 Aug →
ancient13–100.0013%1 Aug →
mirage13–30.1222%31 Jul →
cache13–80.0719%31 Jul →
mirage13–80.0416%31 Jul →
mirage13–2-0.0117%31 Jul →
ancient13–80.0315%31 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0315%31 Jul →
mirage8–130.0718%30 Jul →
inferno13–80.0120%30 Jul →
mirage9–130.0319%30 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0716%30 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0417%29 Jul →
dust27–130.0314%29 Jul →
mirage13–10.077%15 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.018%15 Jul →
inferno13–90.0327%14 Jul →
nuke9–00.3233%13 Jul →
inferno8–8-0.0011%13 Jul →
debris9–20.1655%12 Jul →
inferno9–10.3756%12 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.067%12 Jul →
cache13–50.0716%11 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0721%11 Jul →
dust29–130.0223%11 Jul →
mirage13–110.1115%9 Jul →
ancient13–70.056%9 Jul →
nuke16–140.0433%9 Jul →
mirage13–110.0123%8 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0616%8 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.