nooba — CS2 Stats
GB76561198349116465[U:1:388850737]Steam profile ↗1 game ban
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
No change since then — still 362 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.
CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 9 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.
Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →
Rating over time
Premier CS Rating
- 1,373 below peak (19,999)
- 0 over 90 days
- Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,374 to go
- Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
- Purple band first seen 2026-09-10
- Blue band first seen 2026-09-10
Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.3pp headshot accuracy · +56ms reaction
Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.
Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches
Last 5
- 2–1–2 · 40% win rate
- Avg rating -0.04
- Avg headshot accuracy 20%
- Avg reaction 709ms
Last 10
- 2–6–2 · 20% win rate
- Avg rating -0.04
- Avg headshot accuracy 18%
- Avg reaction 695ms
Last 20
- 5–13–2 · 25% win rate
- Avg rating -0.05
- Avg headshot accuracy 19%
- Avg reaction 666ms
Newest first, from the last 47 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.
Player DNA
Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 94% playstyle similarity
Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Reaction time. 699ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 47 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Personal bests
Across the last 47 tracked matches.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 mirage | B | 12 | 6–6 | 50% | -0.05 |
 nuke | B | 11 | 5–6 | 45% | -0.05 |
 inferno | — | 4 | 0–4 | 0% | -0.09 |
 cache | — | 4 | 1–3 | 25% | -0.04 |
 ancient | — | 4 | 3–1 | 75% | -0.03 |
 anubis | — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | -0.02 |
 dust2 | — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | -0.06 |
| warden | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.03 |
 vertigo | — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | -0.09 |
 overpass | — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | 0.01 |
Across the last 47 tracked matches.
Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4549 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 21.4529% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nuke | 12–12 | -0.03 | 23% | 26 Jul → | |
| mirage | 12–12 | 0.00 | 23% | 26 Jul → | |
| nuke | 13–6 | -0.03 | 19% | 24 Jun → | |
| inferno | 11–13 | -0.11 | 11% | 24 Jun → | |
| warden | 13–5 | -0.03 | 23% | 16 Jun → | |
| mirage | 0–13 | -0.07 | 13% | 16 Jun → | |
| nuke | 0–4 | -0.07 | 0% | 16 Jun → | |
| cache | 1–13 | -0.06 | 20% | 16 Jun → | |
| warden | 10–13 | -0.03 | 21% | 27 May → | |
| nuke | 4–13 | -0.01 | 24% | 27 May → | |
| cache | 13–2 | -0.05 | 27% | 15 May → | |
| cache | 10–13 | -0.02 | 17% | 12 May → | |
| cache | 10–13 | -0.03 | 13% | 12 May → | |
| ancient | 9–13 | -0.07 | 16% | 25 Apr → | |
| anubis | 9–13 | -0.03 | 12% | 22 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | -0.02 | 20% | 22 Apr → | |
| dust2 | 6–13 | -0.10 | 24% | 20 Apr → | |
| mirage | 6–13 | -0.11 | 28% | 20 Apr → | |
| nuke | 14–16 | -0.04 | 25% | 19 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–11 | -0.03 | 19% | 7 Apr → | |
| inferno | 7–13 | -0.06 | 10% | 2 Apr → | |
| mirage | 13–5 | -0.06 | 5% | 2 Apr → | |
| inferno | 7–13 | -0.12 | 25% | 2 Apr → | |
| nuke | 13–9 | -0.12 | 26% | 25 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–9 | -0.09 | 13% | 25 Mar → | |
| mirage | 16–13 | -0.07 | 22% | 25 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–7 | -0.07 | 38% | 25 Mar → | |
| mirage | 13–8 | -0.03 | 16% | 24 Mar → | |
| mirage | 8–13 | -0.07 | 5% | 21 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 3–13 | -0.05 | 35% | 21 Mar → | |
| anubis | 13–16 | -0.07 | 16% | 21 Mar → | |
| ancient | 13–10 | -0.05 | 27% | 21 Mar → | |
| nuke | 2–13 | -0.07 | 25% | 21 Mar → | |
| dust2 | 13–11 | -0.02 | 20% | 20 Mar → | |
| ancient | 13–10 | -0.08 | 12% | 20 Mar → | |
| anubis | 13–6 | 0.03 | 17% | 20 Mar → | |
| nuke | 13–10 | -0.08 | 24% | 20 Mar → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.03 | 16% | 20 Mar → | |
| mirage | 9–13 | -0.05 | 17% | 16 Feb → | |
| mirage | 5–1 | 0.06 | 42% | 16 Feb → | |
| ancient | 2–0 | 0.10 | 100% | 16 Feb → | |
| vertigo | 9–6 | 0.01 | 18% | 19 Jan → | |
| nuke | 11–13 | -0.06 | 22% | 18 Jan → | |
| overpass | 9–7 | 0.07 | 25% | 16 Jan → | |
| inferno | 5–9 | -0.09 | 8% | 9 Jan → | |
| overpass | 8–8 | -0.05 | 24% | 9 Jan → | |
| vertigo | 9–6 | -0.19 | 25% | 9 Jan → |
Match data via Leetify.
