tupilak

tupilak — CS2 Stats

DK76561198343056868[U:1:382791140]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,801Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 4,375 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (20 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 4,375 → 4,375
+29Tracked matches · now 2,801
+13.3ppWin rate · 33.3% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 4,375 +0 28 Aug – 23 Sept · 7 observations
4,3754,375peak 4,37528 Aug23 Sept
4,375Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-07-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 4,375
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Reached: 4,000 ELO · 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO
  • 4,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtupilakFACEITLevel 10 · 4,375 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO4,375csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning53
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–53Last 10047%Win rateLLLLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 452ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 446ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 441ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim9.5
Utility6.7
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning5.3
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time426ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 451ms → last ⅓ avg 426ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 21.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–7 · ancient, 29 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · anubis, 9 Sept →
297msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 8 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
L6Current streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 61% over 18infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2916–1355%0.00
ancientA1811–761%-0.00
nukeA169–756%0.00
anubisD154–1127%-0.02
infernoD123–925%-0.01
cacheC104–640%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,532Matches
55%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
84.5ADR
55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage46457%1.2617.1
Ancient36058%1.3517.1
Anubis26955%1.2716.8
Dust218056%1.2916.7
Nuke17863%1.3417.6
Overpass8766%1.2816.9
Vertigo8679%1.4216.9
Inferno6455%1.2615.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy
40.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.8%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
426msReaction time
39.4%T opening success
41.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
9.32HE damage / grenade
13.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.3802% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–130.0415%9 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0622%9 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0413%8 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0717%8 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0129%7 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0223%7 Oct →
mirage13–70.049%5 Oct →
nuke13–70.0428%5 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0112%3 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0618%3 Oct →
inferno14–160.0421%3 Oct →
mirage11–130.0112%2 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0321%2 Oct →
mirage13–70.0224%1 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0629%1 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0223%1 Oct →
mirage13–20.0128%28 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0017%28 Sept →
mirage13–20.0220%28 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0022%26 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0236%26 Sept →
mirage13–20.0523%25 Sept →
ancient13–40.0019%25 Sept →
mirage22–200.0022%23 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0025%23 Sept →
anubis10–130.0217%23 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0025%23 Sept →
anubis10–130.0217%23 Sept →
mirage22–200.0022%23 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0320%23 Sept →
inferno16–19-0.0711%23 Sept →
inferno16–19-0.0811%23 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0320%23 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0413%10 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0230%10 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0650%9 Sept →
mirage11–130.0030%9 Sept →
nuke13–40.0432%9 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0119%7 Sept →
nuke13–50.0315%7 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0522%6 Sept →
mirage7–130.0128%5 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0218%5 Sept →
ancient7–130.0227%2 Sept →
nuke9–130.0015%2 Sept →
anubis13–110.0230%2 Sept →
mirage13–70.0541%2 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0418%2 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0021%2 Sept →
inferno13–30.0529%2 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0016%29 Aug →
ancient13–70.1025%29 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0820%29 Aug →
ancient13–100.0123%29 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0211%29 Aug →
mirage13–60.0010%29 Aug →
nuke10–130.0125%27 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0428%27 Aug →
cache5–130.0333%26 Aug →
cache6–130.0249%26 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0323%24 Aug →
anubis16–14-0.0531%24 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0127%24 Aug →
mirage13–7-0.0126%24 Aug →
nuke13–40.0627%23 Aug →
ancient13–8-0.0525%20 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0130%19 Aug →
ancient13–90.0021%19 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0921%19 Aug →
ancient13–50.0116%19 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0417%18 Aug →
inferno7–130.0123%18 Aug →
anubis13–3-0.0314%18 Aug →
inferno13–60.0241%18 Aug →
ancient13–70.0221%17 Aug →
ancient19–16-0.0124%16 Aug →
nuke13–40.0618%16 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0418%16 Aug →
ancient13–80.0218%16 Aug →
mirage13–60.0823%16 Aug →
nuke13–90.0233%15 Aug →
mirage13–90.0128%15 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0321%15 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0130%15 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0418%14 Aug →
mirage13–40.0028%14 Aug →
cache16–140.0033%14 Aug →
mirage13–40.0327%14 Aug →
anubis13–100.0028%14 Aug →
inferno9–130.0323%8 Aug →
anubis11–130.0119%8 Aug →
mirage13–50.0616%7 Aug →
nuke13–7-0.0315%7 Aug →
cache15–19-0.0213%7 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0323%7 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0611%4 Aug →
cache13–160.0519%4 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0611%4 Aug →
cache13–160.0519%4 Aug →
cache19–170.0227%31 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.