raatelija

raatelija — CS2 Stats

FI76561198340196175[U:1:379930447]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

615Tracked matches74%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,437Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,452Purple band · top ~14.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#95996 of 231741 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 940 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 11 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,452 +2,862 30 Aug19 Sept · 10 days played
15,35018,452peak 18,45230 Aug19 Sept
18,594Peak Premier in tracked matches
940Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-08-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 940
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 111 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 18,452
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,548 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-14
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches50
Win rate52%
K/D0.93
Headshot %44%

Measured 13 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,417), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate39.2%43.8%44.8%5.6% short
Shot accuracy14.7%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.901.021.040.14 short
Match win rate40.1%44.7%45.2%5.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGraatelijaFACEITLevel 5 · 940 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,452 · Purple bandPEAK ELO940csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning56
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57358Last 10057%Win rateWLWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · +13ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Last 20

  • 1262 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility3.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch5.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.6
Utility3.5
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time528ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–2 · nuke, 13 Sept
44%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · nuke, 5 Sept
352msFastest reaction time · 16–12 · mirage, 14 Sept
13–1Biggest win · shelter, 16 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 5anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB1910953%-0.04
nukeB178947%-0.02
infernoS1612475%-0.01
ancientC94544%-0.04
dust2C94544%0.00
vertigoS65183%0.03
cacheS550100%0.03
anubisC52340%0.05
poseidon41325%-0.03
overpass31233%-0.06
train330100%0.01
shelter110100%0.14
eldorado110100%0.13
debris1010%-0.24
office1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

59,138Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
4,113Matches
40.1%Match win rate
39.2%Headshot %
14.7%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
8,906MVPs
1,437Hours (in match)
3,021Bombs planted
634Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4716,507
AWP6,549
P902,217
FAMAS1,915
MP91,796
SSG 081,715

Lifetime map wins

4,214inferno
2,898dust2
1,941nuke
1,517cbble
1,426vertigo
1,335train
1,122office
349lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

207Matches
51%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
74.9ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

47%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3352%1.0515.3
Nuke2458%0.7713.4
Ancient2255%0.8614.1
Anubis1331%0.8415.0
Dust2978%1.0914.8
Cache862%0.649.4
Overpass757%0.7411.7
Inferno729%0.7111.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
527msReaction time
52.1%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.31Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
6.61HE damage / grenade
7.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3137 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.2376% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–40.0315%19 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0429%19 Sept
ancient13–90.0111%19 Sept
mirage13–2-0.039%18 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0321%17 Sept
mirage13–80.1818%17 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0221%17 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0714%16 Sept
ancient13–3-0.0513%16 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0613%16 Sept
inferno7–90.1129%16 Sept
nuke13–6-0.0027%16 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0215%16 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0416%16 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0411%16 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0211%16 Sept
dust22–13-0.0615%16 Sept
shelter13–10.1414%16 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0115%16 Sept
poseidon8–8-0.0316%16 Sept
anubis9–130.1221%16 Sept
anubis12–120.1621%16 Sept
poseidon9–0-0.026%16 Sept
nuke0–9-0.174%16 Sept
inferno4–9-0.0524%16 Sept
vertigo8–8-0.0122%16 Sept
overpass13–9-0.062%15 Sept
vertigo13–80.046%15 Sept
cache13–40.0217%15 Sept
inferno13–110.0114%15 Sept
dust213–60.0819%15 Sept
train13–5-0.0423%15 Sept
anubis8–20.0119%15 Sept
inferno13–40.0721%15 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0321%15 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0625%15 Sept
anubis13–60.0225%15 Sept
ancient8–13-0.087%14 Sept
mirage16–12-0.0321%14 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0413%14 Sept
dust215–15-0.0328%13 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0325%13 Sept
inferno9–6-0.0722%13 Sept
nuke9–20.2427%13 Sept
nuke9–13-0.1024%13 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0414%13 Sept
dust29–13-0.0816%13 Sept
mirage3–8-0.0821%11 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0326%11 Sept
nuke7–00.0622%11 Sept
vertigo13–6-0.0218%10 Sept
train13–100.0614%9 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0313%9 Sept
mirage13–6-0.097%9 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0718%9 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0633%9 Sept
inferno9–7-0.050%5 Sept
nuke9–20.0744%5 Sept
inferno9–40.1313%5 Sept
poseidon7–90.029%5 Sept
nuke9–2-0.0216%5 Sept
nuke3–13-0.1020%5 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0221%5 Sept
cache13–60.1119%4 Sept
eldorado9–50.1328%4 Sept
poseidon7–9-0.0728%4 Sept
debris2–9-0.240%4 Sept
mirage9–130.0110%31 Aug
nuke13–30.0123%31 Aug
dust22–130.0220%30 Aug
dust213–60.0330%30 Aug
nuke13–80.0120%30 Aug
dust213–50.0413%29 Aug
inferno13–60.0117%29 Aug
train13–50.0217%29 Aug
nuke3–8-0.0914%27 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0914%27 Aug
ancient10–40.0216%26 Aug
vertigo9–70.1121%26 Aug
overpass11–13-0.0516%25 Aug
ancient12–12-0.109%25 Aug
vertigo13–80.079%25 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0920%24 Aug
nuke8–13-0.1115%23 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0713%23 Aug
nuke10–13-0.019%22 Aug
mirage16–13-0.048%22 Aug
anubis13–16-0.086%21 Aug
cache16–14-0.0011%21 Aug
dust27–13-0.0129%20 Aug
inferno13–70.0218%20 Aug
cache13–70.0110%20 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0416%20 Aug
mirage6–13-0.076%18 Aug
office6–13-0.0517%18 Aug
overpass3–10-0.0721%18 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0618%12 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0210%12 Aug
dust216–140.0116%12 Aug
vertigo13–4-0.0012%11 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →